It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I find it strange, we can fund a war for how many years with lives and money and the government puts so much effort into this, but we can`t even take care of the immigration problems we have here at home.
Fix our problems at home first before you go stick your nose into others affairs. This problem should have been delt with long before we went off to fight overseas.
If illegals can cross the border this easy, what about the so called terrorists? What is to stop them? Another item for Arizona to throw at the government in my opinion.
If it only costs me a little of my time, then it is worth it in the end.
Originally posted by indigothefish
this is good news, the bill itself was not going to solve anything anyway
here is my reasoning
as i said in another thread, when you have a bug problem in your house, you don't just get rid of every bug you see on the spot, while that might work for a bug intrusion here and there, when you've got an infestation happening the solution is to call the bug man and lay out a chemical perimeter around your house which will effectively solve the problem
the illegal immigration problem in america is the same, this bill will enable police officers to stop more people based on profiling, which undoubtably will solve more illegal immigrant problems that have ALREADY immigrated here, but as long as we don't finance and focus our attention and intelligence on building up our borders and preventative measures for this problem, it will keep occuring
that is why i think this bill, racist or not, controversial or not, would not have solved our illegal immigrant probelm anyhow
all this bill was going to do was introduce into our mentality that it's ok for police and officials to question you based on how you look, or for no reason at all, ultimately these are philosophies outlined in 1984 and includes a growth of 'big brother's' powers
HOWEVER
i would like to add it is not neccessarily a good thing though, as the federal government is stating that states do not have the right to try and solve 'federal' problems, and the fact that the federal government is intervening within a states rights to govern itself in it's own rights is bad
though, in my personal opinion, the bill was not going to solve anything anyway, this is a testament to our current times
when america was founded, states were given certain rights apon which the government could not federally interfer, but i fear recent years have created the federal governments beleif that if they so choose to they can intervene in any state however they want, legally or not, they think they're the federal government so they get the final say.. which is not what was originally intended in the creation of america
so ultimately my conclusion is this, we avoided a bill that introduced 1984-like proposals, and yet we avoided it by the federal government jaming into our conciousness that it can do whatever it pleases, i don't know which is worse
[edit on 7/28/2010 by indigothefish]
[edit on 7/28/2010 by indigothefish]
Originally posted by Digital_Reality
I'm just confused as to why they are using all this energy to block attempts to secure the border instead of actually trying to pass a law to STOP the migration of drugs and illegals over the border.
They are literally making no attempt at solving the problem. Its almost like they want to allow the current situation to continue.
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
reply to post by TaxpayersUnleashed
Good. Now stop sending the feds money Arizona.
Send that money to the sherrifs that arrest and prosecute the illegals.
No Sherrifs arrest and prosecute illegals...that is kind of the point of striking down this law.
If you cut off money to the feds...then how will they fund ICE and Border Patrol...the only two agencies that CAN and DO enforce immigration laws.
Originally posted by jam321
reply to post by FiatLux
If illegals can cross the border this easy, what about the so called terrorists? What is to stop them? Another item for Arizona to throw at the government in my opinion.
I kindly ask you not to play the terrorist card. First, you are demanding that we basically throw everything at the Southern Border. In doing so we are leaving our other flanks vulnerable. Second, most the terrorist problems we have had problems with have come in Legally with a visa.
If it only costs me a little of my time, then it is worth it in the end.
Then you are a perfect candidate to demand a National Identity card. Most Americans are against it but maybe you can convince with the same logic you used in your post.
Originally posted by FiatLux
Originally posted by jam321
reply to post by FiatLux
If illegals can cross the border this easy, what about the so called terrorists? What is to stop them? Another item for Arizona to throw at the government in my opinion.
I kindly ask you not to play the terrorist card. First, you are demanding that we basically throw everything at the Southern Border. In doing so we are leaving our other flanks vulnerable. Second, most the terrorist problems we have had problems with have come in Legally with a visa.
If it only costs me a little of my time, then it is worth it in the end.
Then you are a perfect candidate to demand a National Identity card. Most Americans are against it but maybe you can convince with the same logic you used in your post.
First off, i don`t play any card. Second, what I stated was my opinion. Third, i don`t need your ok to be able to state my opinion.
As for a National Identity card, no thanks, I have my SS card and drivers license, that`s enough.
Originally posted by jam321
Now I ask you this, merely being an illegal immigrant itself is a misdemeanor.
Which other misdemeanor would you offer a 5,000 dollar reward for?
Originally posted by Sri Oracle
Originally posted by jam321
Now I ask you this, merely being an illegal immigrant itself is a misdemeanor.
Which other misdemeanor would you offer a 5,000 dollar reward for?
That good sir is a wonderful point. I'd rather see an amnesty option first.
Originally posted by indigothefish
this is good news, the bill itself was not going to solve anything anyway
here is my reasoning
as i said in another thread, when you have a bug problem in your house, you don't just get rid of every bug you see on the spot, while that might work for a bug intrusion here and there, when you've got an infestation happening the solution is to call the bug man and lay out a chemical perimeter around your house which will effectively solve the problem
the illegal immigration problem in america is the same, this bill will enable police officers to stop more people based on profiling, which undoubtably will solve more illegal immigrant problems that have ALREADY immigrated here, but as long as we don't finance and focus our attention and intelligence on building up our borders and preventative measures for this problem, it will keep occuring
that is why i think this bill, racist or not, controversial or not, would not have solved our illegal immigrant probelm anyhow
all this bill was going to do was introduce into our mentality that it's ok for police and officials to question you based on how you look, or for no reason at all, ultimately these are philosophies outlined in 1984 and includes a growth of 'big brother's' powers
HOWEVER
i would like to add it is not neccessarily a good thing though, as the federal government is stating that states do not have the right to try and solve 'federal' problems, and the fact that the federal government is intervening within a states rights to govern itself in it's own rights is bad
though, in my personal opinion, the bill was not going to solve anything anyway, this is a testament to our current times
when america was founded, states were given certain rights apon which the government could not federally interfer, but i fear recent years have created the federal governments beleif that if they so choose to they can intervene in any state however they want, legally or not, they think they're the federal government so they get the final say.. which is not what was originally intended in the creation of america
so ultimately my conclusion is this, we avoided a bill that introduced 1984-like proposals, and yet we avoided it by the federal government jaming into our conciousness that it can do whatever it pleases, i don't know which is worse
[edit on 7/28/2010 by indigothefish]
[edit on 7/28/2010 by indigothefish]
Said pickup being driven by an illegal alien going 40 mph because said illegal has no license, no insurance
OK, first its spelled S H E R I F F - one R, not two.
What a lot of people don't understand is that illegals come from China, Tibet, Mongolia, Estonia, Liberia and dozens of other countries.
I find it strange, we can fund a war for how many years with lives and money and the government puts so much effort into this, but we can`t even take care of the immigration problems we have here at home.
Adding to the debt shouldn't be considered funding.
Let's put a spin on things. If by chance that a majority of Americans were dark skinned with black hair and spoke Spanish and the English-speaking light skinned people with blonde, red or brown hair were coming from Mexico to take advantage of the dole here it wouldn't be racial profiling if the dark-skinned, black haired Spanish-speaking Americans stopped them to see if they were Amercan or not. IT WOULD BE OBVIOUS.
The comparison of one thing to another without the use of like or as : “A man is but a weak reed”; “The road was a ribbon of moonlight.” Metaphors are common in literature and expansive speech.
My wife has witnessed on many occasions where obvious immigrants...
...purchase several cases of beer and ice, take it to their vehicle and fill up an oversized cooler and leave the empty boxes and bags ON THE PARKING LOT PAVEMENT!
The worldwide reach of the Russian mob was demonstrated by Ludwig Fainberg, a.k.a. "Tarzan." according to Friedman, the nightclub owner arranged the sale of a Russian submarine, complete with a captain and crew, to Colombian drug runners.
He was arrested before the sale took place, but if the deal had gone through, it would have given the Colombians huge, new smuggling capability: the means to bring 40 tons of coc aine to points up and down the North American Pacific coast.