It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The United States Supreme Court will soon issue a landmark decision on the validity of the Constitution. The Supreme Court will consider three petitions filed by William M. Windsor, a retired Atlanta, Georgia grandfather. The decision should be rendered by the end of the year. Unless The Supreme Court acts, federal judges will be free to void the Constitution.
The Questions Presented to The Supreme Court by Grandfather Windsor are:
Will The Supreme Court declare that the Constitution and its amendments may be voided by federal judges?
Should federal judges be stopped from committing illegal and corrupt acts to obstruct justice and inflict bias on litigants?
Will The Supreme Court be afraid to disclose the corruption in the federal courts?
Originally posted by nlouise
reply to post by Wide Vision 2010
Every time I read Daniel 11:21-24, I think of Obama
Daniel 11:21-24 (King James Version)
21And in his estate shall stand up a vile person, to whom they shall not give the honour of the kingdom: but he shall come in peaceably, and obtain the kingdom by flatteries.
22And with the arms of a flood shall they be overflown from before him, and shall be broken; yea, also the prince of the covenant.
23And after the league made with him he shall work deceitfully: for he shall come up, and shall become strong with a small people.
24He shall enter peaceably even upon the fattest places of the province; and he shall do that which his fathers have not done, nor his fathers' fathers; he shall scatter among them the prey, and spoil, and riches: yea, and he shall forecast his devices against the strong holds, even for a time.
I'm not saying it is him for certain, this could even pertain to another nation entirely, but everytime I read that I think of Obama.
Vs. 21 obtaining the kingdom by flatteries, not being honored by those who aren't buying it.
Vs. 22 sounds like what is about to happen to all of us.
Vs. 23 mentions a 'league made with him, and him working deceitfully, becoming strong with a small people.
Vs. 24 sounds like the last few trips he and his wife took with all the tens of millions spent on 'security' personnel, and unessessary entourage.
Originally posted by DutchBigBoy
Yet the Bible identifies Satan as the "prince of the power of the air ', or' high places', 'height' or 'heaven', which not the heaven of God is meant. Rabbi Ehrenkrantz writes in his commentary that "lightning" and "high places / heights" in Hebrew that said:
Barak U Vamah (also pronounced as V B, U can be O), ie:
Barak O Bama
Now it is confirmed in Luke 10:18 that Jesus actually says in Hebrew: "I saw Satan like Barak O Bama."
Originally posted by thegoodearth
Originally posted by oniongrass
I'd appreciate if the critics restrict their comment to facts. "You predicted X and X didn't happen." That's a fair comment.
[edit on 29-7-2010 by oniongrass]
Well, oniongrass, we critics have restricted our comments to facts...
He has predicted X and X didn't happen, as seen by the detailed listing a few pages back...
They were fair comments, as per your request on 7-29-2010.
Could you at least concede to that?
There are predictions that have not happened, yet. Others are claimed a failure before the time lapse has passed. That is ludicrous and a cheat. Allow the time for the predictions to happen, if they have a time slot.
Critics have proven nothing, beyond trolling the thread.
Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by DutchBigBoy
You Tube videos are not trustable. Look for better sources.
Originally posted by nlouise
$11,000 fine, arrest possible for some who refuse airport scans and pat downs
The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) is warning that any would-be commercial airline passenger who enters an airport checkpoint and then refuses to undergo the method of inspection designated by TSA will not be allowed to fly and also will not be permitted to simply leave the airport.
www.sun-sentinel.com..." target="_blank" class="postlink">Heres the Link
The article goes on to say that you have to stay for questioning by TSA and possibly Law enforcement, and if you refuse you will face fines up to $11,000 and possible arrest.
Wait until they start putting them up in all the court houses, grocery stores, and malls and banks. I guess for right now they only want to 'condition' us to think that terrorists only exist in airports.
This is not dated, but to date this is a massive failure.
Not dated and no war. To date this is a failure.
People like myself have made it explicitly that up to now these undated predictions have been a failure. I would also call an open ended prediction, i.e. a false prediction. If people want to supply dates to these undated predictions that would be helpful.
This, the internet, is the greatest repository of knowledge ...
You don't recognize much do you? The internet is indeed a wonder.
Your last few posts have shown that you are not neutral, not objective. You say airport security hasn't just taken a big jump for the worse. Now you say the internet isn't a great place to get information!
The information is often poor and always needs to be taken with a grain of salt.
Sheesh, I wonder if you like anything. Maybe you're not a shill. Maybe you're just negative because it's easier in some way.