It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Kalki11
Scalar Interferometry (SI) is the next laser, but to an even greater extent - it will be responsible for fantastic Star Trek technologies.
Let’s look at HAARP. As you may know HAARP and its sister sites are capable of boiling the ionosphere, steering the jet stream, inducing earthquakes, Norway Spirals, frequency pulling the Schumann resonance and that’s just the exothermic mode (Norway Spiral may have been both).
These two interferometers are composed of a square array of littler antennae, pulsed in such a way as to interfere as desired for a given effect/purpose. Bearden points out that, indeed, nothing is “cancelled out”, what we call destructive interference is phase-conjugate pumping of the local aether.
Tom Bearden is responsible for informing us about the implications and uses of this planar, square design and it’s quite awesome to consider, but I ask you to consider the following:
What if the interferometer was shaped according to other geometries?
What if the array was pulsed in neither exothermic nor endothermic patterns?
What if the size was shrunk down to the size of a Post-it note?
What if carrier waves were modulated with pre-chosen signatures?
Consider PHI – it is inherent to pretty much all life and has been found in non-living matter as well.
Picture an interferometer that is shaped like the center of a daisy, or a ring (StarGate)?
What happens if two interferometers are aimed straight at each other so that they have a mutual scalar bottle? What if they are both in endothermic mode? What if you inject some kind of particle beam into the scalar bottle?
What if three interferometers, all perpendicular to each other, are phased at some gravitational constant/frequency? They could be a practical means of “gripping” space or antigravity, or if you ever played Half-Life 2 you could have a gravity gun, called “Kinetic kicker” in the game Snowblind.
Well, I could go on and on but let’s stop here, take a breath, and go back to HAARP.
You think what I just said is ludicrous?
Google HAARP and verify its capabilities, the square grid, with simple carrier waves, pulsed in simple ways can already do so much.
Originally posted by Kalki11
reply to post by buddhasystem
Kurzweil's use of the term singularity is synonymous with infinite tech or convergence of bio/nano/info tech - as opposed to a literal singularity. mastery of either is godlike.
As for the Bedlam, yeah guy, there is an aether, it's called Zero Point Field.
Originally posted by Kalki11
As for the Bedlam, yeah guy, there is an aether, it's called Zero Point Field.
Originally posted by __rich__
Didn't Nikola Tesla come up with this over 100 years ago?
Originally posted by Bedlam
Originally posted by __rich__
Didn't Nikola Tesla come up with this over 100 years ago?
Not in any way that I can imagine, even with really stretching points.
He did really well with induction motors and fluorescent lights. After that, not so much.
Originally posted by abecedarian
I think the closest we'll get to scalar is within an EME near field, which would be too close to be useful at optical frequencies and even still too close for comfort at most usable RF frequencies.
[edit on 7/24/2010 by abecedarian]
Originally posted by __rich__
You don't remember his "death ray"? Some speculate the Tunguska event was accidentally caused by him testing it.
So you'd need standing waves, right? And those would be most accessible in the near field, no?
Originally posted by Bedlam
Originally posted by abecedarian
I think the closest we'll get to scalar is within an EME near field, which would be too close to be useful at optical frequencies and even still too close for comfort at most usable RF frequencies.
[edit on 7/24/2010 by abecedarian]
Even near field isn't scalar unless you have polarity-free magnetic and electric fields which don't exist - scalar isn't scalar if there's vectors involved.
Originally posted by Bedlam
Originally posted by __rich__
You don't remember his "death ray"? Some speculate the Tunguska event was accidentally caused by him testing it.
That wasn't really "scalar fields" though. At the risk of invoking MB Kennel asking questions I'm not going to answer, it ended up being a neat weapon system, but it's not a scalar weapon.
Originally posted by __rich__
Are you sure? The reason I ask is because there are a myriad of sources saying it was an endothermic scalar howitzer.
Originally posted by Bedlam
Originally posted by __rich__
Are you sure? The reason I ask is because there are a myriad of sources saying it was an endothermic scalar howitzer.
And they are all derivatives of Bearden, and he's nuts. A scalar field has no vector components - EM radiation is composed of two vector components. If you ever get a chance to talk to Tom - lead off the conversation with "If EM waves are actually longitudinal waves that propagate through the aether, how in hell can you polarize them?" and watch him have a meltdown.
"Wow, these high powered x-rays shooting through my brain are making my thoughts so clear, so lucid - why is the skin coming off my head?" Nikola Tesla