Originally posted by Kalki11
Scalar Interferometry (SI) is the next laser, but to an even greater extent - it will be responsible for fantastic Star Trek technologies.
There is no such thing as a scalar interferometer. Tom Bearden not withstanding.
Let’s look at HAARP. As you may know HAARP and its sister sites are capable of boiling the ionosphere, steering the jet stream, inducing earthquakes, Norway Spirals, frequency pulling the Schumann resonance and that’s just the exothermic mode (Norway Spiral may have been both).
Not any of that, actually. I guess it sort of depends on how you define "boiling". And you'd probably have to grasp what Schumann's resonance is, if you think it's "the heartbeat of Gaia" or the like, it might fit better in one of the woo-ier forums. Personally, I also like to blame HAARP for sunburn, that irritating tendency for campfire smoke to always blow in my face whereever I sit, skunky beer, people that call my cell phone when I'm asleep and the IRS.
These two interferometers are composed of a square array of littler antennae, pulsed in such a way as to interfere as desired for a given effect/purpose. Bearden points out that, indeed, nothing is “cancelled out”, what we call destructive interference is phase-conjugate pumping of the local aether.
Which two interferometers? The IRI at HAARP does use "interference" to form a beam - it's a phased array, after all, that's how they work. But there's no "phase conjugate pumping of aether", because there's no aether to pump, and if you did, I'm not sure how you combine phase conjugation and pumping in that context. You do have to 'pump' some types of phase conjugators, but that doesn't seem to fit Bearden's tripe as he spews it.
Tom Bearden is responsible for informing us about the implications and uses of this planar, square design and it’s quite awesome to consider, but I ask you to consider the following:
That's because he's the head honcho of 'scalar waves' - pretty much the source of all the other crap you hear about it. And there are no scalar EM waves, because it's not the way EM works. You can have a scalar field, mind you, it's a field without vectors. A temperature map is a representation of a scalar field of temperatures.
What if the interferometer was shaped according to other geometries?
What if the array was pulsed in neither exothermic nor endothermic patterns?
What if the size was shrunk down to the size of a Post-it note?
What if carrier waves were modulated with pre-chosen signatures?
What if scalar waves actually existed, instead of being Bearden babble?
Have you ever talked to the guy? I think you'd be a lot less inclined to worry about it if you had. Or, maybe not. I don't get into woo that much, I have friends that adore him.
While you're discussing ol' Tom, why don't you go over a few of his even more wacky beliefs? I like ZOG myself.
Consider PHI – it is inherent to pretty much all life and has been found in non-living matter as well.
I call it....dihydrogen monoxide.
Picture an interferometer that is shaped like the center of a daisy, or a ring (StarGate)?
Why are all rings suddenly stargates? Let me guess - before the movie, you wouldn't have ever come up with it.
What happens if two interferometers are aimed straight at each other so that they have a mutual scalar bottle? What if they are both in endothermic mode? What if you inject some kind of particle beam into the scalar bottle?
What if three interferometers, all perpendicular to each other, are phased at some gravitational constant/frequency? They could be a practical means of “gripping” space or antigravity, or if you ever played Half-Life 2 you could have a gravity gun, called “Kinetic kicker” in the game Snowblind.
What makes you think gravity has a frequency to be 'phased' at? What happens if you reverse the polarity on the inverse graviton emitters at the same time the main deflector dish emits a beam of conjugated tachyon quarks into the singularity rotator? What if you overcharge the anti-protons in the matrix calibrator at the same time Data reconfigures the shield nutation frequency?
Well, I could go on and on but let’s stop here, take a breath, and go back to HAARP.
Thanks, I was about to have to download a ST:TNG buzzword generator - I can't remember all the crap they used to use offhand.
You think what I just said is ludicrous?
well...
Google HAARP and verify its capabilities, the square grid, with simple carrier waves, pulsed in simple ways can already do so much.
But if you read Begich-derived poo, you won't learn much that's real. Lots of total crap, but not much that's real.
