It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by reesie45
Lol Funny video indeed! And wasnt Thermite found at the wtc site? Something used in demolitions? en.wikipedia.org...
Originally posted by Insolubrious
Thanks for posting the clip, it was nice to see it again and I knew I would see it again. I had a feeling the first time I saw this on morning TV the CTers would probably dive on this slightly ambiguous comment.
Yep, I think it's certainly an odd comment to compare the steel beams that they are preparing to demolish to the World trade center beams. Did those beams in the WTC pose a problem for CDI too? Why would they say that if they had no experience of rigging the WTC beams for demolition?
Even knowing they were only officially involved with the clean up efforts I still think it's an odd thing to say when planning the demolition. Perhaps this is a rumour but I heard CDI were turned away early on from assisting in the clean up, which would make the comment even more bizarre.
[edit on 18-7-2010 by Insolubrious]
Originally posted by Sky watcher
Originally posted by ypperst
Good video I think there is no way jet fuel can rip worldtrade center like that way.
But I still dont really get why USA would do that on them self. Was it to get a reason to attack isreal?
Oh, if it is done by USA, how did they force osama bin laden to say in his video, that he did it?
Oh, is that why Laden maybe is still alive?
and is that a helicopter or a UFO in the skies in the start of the first building rip down.
The first thing Bin Laden said right after 9/11 is that he did NOT do it, He understood why someone would but that he and his group did not do it in a hour long typical OBL speech.
Later we have the fakes made by the CIA claiming to be OBL, claiming he did and you know the rest.
Originally posted by wmd_2008
reply to post by letthereaderunderstand
Here we go again at NO repeat NO point did anybody claim that only fire brought the towers down plain and simple.
A combination of structural damage , fire and load above impact point brought them down.
Originally posted by Six Sigma
The Regurgitation Continues!
There is a thread here at ATS Has 9/11 Truth Had it's Day?
This thread "911 is Joke in your town....."solidifies the fact that it has. This thread started off with an edited video that's last words were "smoke pot everyday"
Anyway, as the discussions started, so did the continued regurgitation of the fantasies. In this threads only 2 + pages we have had to once again sit through the following:
-squibs
-Jet fuel caused them to collapse
-steel into powder
-angle cuts on the I-beams
-asbestos problem at the WTC
-Silverstein
-Claims of a countdown on a Red Cross radio
-Fatty Bin Laden
-molten steel
-huge freakin airplane fit into that iddy biddy hole in the pentagon
-security of the WTC
-lack of video at the Pentagon
All completely debunked 2005, yet still being discussed. Same old same old!
[edit on 18-7-2010 by Six Sigma]
Originally posted by Sloppy
. Fatty Osama? It's not the same Osama, it's not hard to see. He has a different skin color and a different face, that, and he is fat.
Originally posted by letthereaderunderstand
No, the last words were "Good is Dumb"
Third, if the "squib" like pops had not come from literal squibs, why would they pop like them? Why wouldn't whole floors burst out if there was so much pressure to cause that in the first place. What do you say about the Naudet Documentary with the firemen describing the sequenced "booms".
Compared too...
What do you say about the Naudet Documentary with the firemen describing the sequenced "booms".
Originally posted by Six Sigma
Originally posted by letthereaderunderstand
No, the last words were "Good is Dumb"
The last words in the song were what?
Originally posted by pacific_waters
This is really getting tiring. Steel loses its structural integroty at around 800 degrees fahrenheit, well within the heat range of any jet fuel fire. Also the heat would have been exacerbated by the induction of oxygen as the heat created its own firestorm.
Of interest is the maximum value which is fairly regularly found. This value turns out to be around 1200°C, although a typical post-flashover room fire will more commonly be 900~1000°C. The time-temperature curve for the standard fire endurance test, ASTM E 119 [13] goes up to 1260°C, but this is reached only in 8 hr. In actual fact, no jurisdiction demands fire endurance periods for over 4 hr, at which point the curve only reaches 1093°C.
Factor of safety (FoS or FS) is a term describing the structural capacity of a system beyond the applied loads or actual loads. Essentially, how much stronger the system is than it needs to be for a given load. Safety factors are calculated because comprehensive destructive testing is impractical on many projects, such as bridges and buildings, or early in the design cycle but the structure's ability to carry load must be determined to a reasonable accuracy. So detailed analysis is used to examine the performance of the design....
Buildings commonly use a factor of safety of 2.0 for each structural member. The value for buildings is relatively low because the loads are well understood and most structures are redundant
Only three locations had evidence that the steel reached temperatures above 250 °C...
...These microstructures show no evidence of exposure to temperatures above 600 °C for any significant time.
Originally posted by Sloppy
reply to post by Six Sigma
Uh? Don't know if your eyes need checking, or if your looking at something else, as the video below your last post bares no relevance whatsoever. The still, I am assuming comes from the confession tape of Osama, which is NOT him. I will be a bigot in this matter, as nothing you say to me is going to convince me they're one and the same.
You guys really are making me feel paranoid - It's not hard to see the difference, which leads me to conclude you have another agenda; posting random irrelevant videos and saying debunked in 05. Nah mate, no chance.
EDIT: I feel your right - I am helping derail the thread. Sorry OP. I wont stray off-topic again.
Back on topic: for those who say the high temperatures weakened the steel - I don't think anyone is unequivocally denying that. I'm not sure if the same applies to building seven though?
If you helped plan an attack like this, you would obviously have worked the maths out a million times before carrying out the job; maybe the 'thermite' or explosives helped make sure the buildings came down?
[edit on 18-7-2010 by Sloppy]
Firefighter #1 "What did we do? We made it outside? We made it about a block?"
Firefighter #2 "We made it at least two blocks and...we started running"
Firefighter #1 "Boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom," Motioning with his hand from top to bottom in rapid succession
Firefighter #2 "Floor by floor it started popping out" motioning with his hand from top to bottom successively
Firefighter #1 "It was like, it was if...if they had detonate"
Firefighter #2 "Yeah detonated it yeah"
Firefighter #1 "It was if they had planned to take down a building" motioning with his hand again from top to bottom in rapid succession "Boom, boom, boom, boom, boom boom"
Firefighter #2 "Yeah all the way down, I was watching it...and running"
Originally posted by SphinxMontreal
"Now, THIS is why the conspiracy theorists are getting nowhere with their conspiracy stories."
So, you obviously have made a career out of responding and rebutting people who are getting nowhere. What does that say about you?