You don't have a slightest hint of a clue how science works.
I doubt you ever threw a penny in our direction, so shutting up is the recommended course of action.
Yes, in a retard's disturbed sleep.
You deflect what might be irrelevant, with more irrelevancies. My analogue might be the blind trying to lead the blind. Your tone and temperament do
not do your name, intelligence, or the subject any justice
there will always be another smaller particle to discover and so on and so on ..... infinite streching into smaller and smaller particles .....
I completely agree with you, this is why I want to coin my theorised 4th dimensional "Super God Particle" and my even more evasive, M theory "Super
Duper God Particles" right now! hehe
So if they find out how to manipulate mass, does that mean they will be able to create any element? Such as gold.
It's extremely difficult to convert one atom into another. It can only be done with nuclear reactions, and there is no known nuclear fuel that will
decompose not leaving gold as nuclear waste. Also, since gold is very stable, it doesn't react much with anything. Gold was first synthesized from
mercury by neutron bombardment in 1941, but not only was the gold very expensive to produced it was highly radioactive.
Would the 'god particle' essentially be the aether theories explored by earlier scientists.
As far as I can tell the Aether Model work great to mathematically substantiates unified field Theory, but this theory is not particle physics. It is
unobserved Planck scale unification based on unobserved speculation.
Personally I still love the artificial StarGate theory.