It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Leveller
Having analysed it, I think we can safely assume that it was written by your good self. Not only is the tone of the content yours, but the punctuation is the same. We see plenty of use of ".......", just as you have used in this thread.
For example:
"Fake" Decretal: - "But would you know what I mean by 'Non nobis, domine, non nobis, sed nomini tuo da gloriam!'... You may, but I doubt it."
Decretal in this thread:- "First of all, it is Sephiroth, and second... Shows what you know"
We can also see the same use and style in the original post in this thread which was also written by you as "hobctc".
hobtc:- "Should decretal have his membership restated here on the board ... You will find a great and enormous depth of knowledge can be applied and shared by him."
[edit on 19-6-2004 by Leveller]
Not a problem. Look, I don't think you're a Freemason... or if you are a Freemason, that you're not behaving in an appropriate way, but that doesn't mean I think you're an irretrievable jerk. It would just be nice if you could stop acting like an arrogant 16 year old who's just discovered philosophy, and wants to let everyone else know just how ignorant they are. Just because people don't constantly spout about something, doesn't mean they don't know anything about it.
Well, I'm sorry to hear that. It's awfully rough. It seems that these days, people like me who have no real major problems (I have a slight blood sugar thing, but nothing serious) are really in the minority. If you could try to use the simplest vocabulary that fully explains what you want to say, I think you'd find that you would be a lot more successful in, as they say, "winning friends and influencing people." After all, parsimony is the soul of elegance
That's not strictly speaking true. The convention that says that, for example, Qabalah is a Christian study while Kabbalah is a Judaic one is fairly recent. Certainly, if you go back to Moses de Leon, you will see that the different spellings were just that, different transliterations. There's no need to have all this messy convergent-spelling stuff in my opinion... let's just state clearly what we mean, and there won't be the need for esoteric spellings.
I can't conceive of how one can belong to the Temple of Set (a selfish institution if I have ever heard of one) and simultaneously claim to be a truly dedicated Freemason. That is just my opinion, but I believe that it would be shared by the vast majority of Freemasons. You've actually got to choose -- you can't just dip your toe in every pool and never dive in to one. If you're going to be an unselfish person, then you have to make the Kirkegaardian "Leap of Faith."
Originally posted by Decretal
The first thing I would say about your analysation is this>insert ellipse< George Bush came to the conclusion that Saddam Hussein was in possession if weapons capable of mass destruction.
On it's own this is good enough evidence. Taken with the other 20 or so reasons to doubt you I believe that you have been proven a liar.
Some of my methods, I will not reveal to you. As Darktalon stated: once revealed, you adapt around them. "Insight" was an example (I'm afraid you overkilled that one though) and I'm not here to give you spelling lessons - only to unmask you as a fraud and a liar.
Your protests are rather lame now. What displays your arrogance and your ignorance to the utmost is that you have been found wanting so many times and yet still falsely protest your innocence. The ridiculous claims that you have made, along with the evidence presented and the evidence that I have U2Ued some of the masons here, means that you will never gain credibility as a freemason here on ATS.
Sure, your alias might be Freemason, and you may even start new accounts as you have done so many times before, but by now I can sniff you out at your 1st or 2nd post - you aren't half as clever as you think you are. As long as you post fraudulently I will keep unmasking you as a liar.
I guess that you are just a sad little ignoramus. Claiming to be something that you are not is the sign of a delusional fool. Claiming to be proficient in that something, makes you a delusional arrogant fool. To think that you can fool other Freemasons into accepting you, makes you a delusional, arrogant, ignorant fool. Heh, I've run out of adjectives to describe you.
Originally posted by Leveller
Bugger off back to the gutter which you oozed out of.
Originally posted by Gerard
I have read Decretal's posts and have come to the conclusion that he is a Cowan.
Originally posted by Gerard
If Decretal wants to become a mason then he will have to stop his delusional behaviour and say that he is sorry for his actions.
Originally posted by Decretal
Gee Leveller, that hurt me deep down inside - For me to never gain credibility as a Freemason on a Conspiracy Theory Forum - Why don't you just go ahead and shoot me instead?
Originally posted by Leveller
As for the term "cowan" it means "pretender". I have to admit that it is not a word that I would use outside of Lodge, but it does describe Decretal perfectly.
Originally posted by jbmitch
I recently left the BV which was heavy in Freemasons, and its odd that a similar situation arose there.
Originally posted by Leveller
You write that as with sarcasm, but it obviously does hurt you. Why else post 50 or so times to keep up this pathetic charade?
You yearn for credibility in the way that no true freemason would.
I don't really care how many aliases you have Freemason - they all eventually display your ignorance. I guess it's time you gave up on this one though - it's run it's course and been damaged beyond repair.
Originally posted by Decretal
Greetings Leveller, there is no word with which I could possibly describe my disgust with your attitude towrd your fellow Brother.
You have not yet displayed who you really are, your Lodge name and number, jursidiction, affiliations etc.
You reduce yourself to insults - instead of intelligently rebuttling an argument. All you have made is mere speculation.
Originally posted by Decretal
As for the term 'Cowan', it's actual literal meaning is someone who knows nothings of the Lodge; not a pretender - contrary to what you may believe.
Perhaps you should take a page out of Alex's book.
Originally posted by Leveller
Finally, your accusation that all I have made is speculation is not entirely true. You have proven yourself (without any help from me) that you are a liar. I have intelligently rebutted your arguments. All you have come back with is lame excuse after lame excuse. You haven't even answered the most damning critisisms and have skirted round those that you can't deal with.
Why post the constant, pathetic rebuttals every time you are caught in a lie?
Bugger off back to the gutter which you oozed out of.
I ask you again, why does your posting time exactly correspond to those of the other aliases I have accused you of?
Originally posted by Decretal
Judging from this we can easily make the assumption that not only do you not rebuttle (and can't spell it) - but your interpretation of 'intelligent rebuttal' is mere insults. Hardly the conduct of a Mason.
Originally posted by Leveller
re�but�tal P Pronunciation Key (r-btl)
n.
The act of rebutting.
A statement made in rebutting.
rebuttal
n 1: the act of refuting by offering a contrary contention or argument 2: a pleading by the defendant in reply to a plaintiff's surrejoinder [syn: rebutter]
As for my conduct as a mason? Critisism coming from you falls on deaf ears.
Originally posted by Decretal
You just proved my point of you not adding value to conversation.
1. All you have done in this thread is insult me, accused me of lying, and not rebuttled and arguments.
2. I have proven myself more so than you. I took the initiative to put my Lodge name and number, and jurisdiction under public scrutiny - You have done no such thing.
Wow, bad case of selective reading. Seems Leveller has brought up many, many points of rebuttal. It is you that hasn't countered those rebuttals. And please, I will go back through all of Levellers, ME's, Alex's, Mine, and everyone else that brought points up, that you have yet to prove or disprove.
Originally posted by Decretal
Originally posted by Leveller
Finally, your accusation that all I have made is speculation is not entirely true. You have proven yourself (without any help from me) that you are a liar. I have intelligently rebutted your arguments. All you have come back with is lame excuse after lame excuse. You haven't even answered the most damning critisisms and have skirted round those that you can't deal with.
You have intelligently rebuttled my arguments!? How about I leave you with yet another of your posts to answer your own argument...
Why post the constant, pathetic rebuttals every time you are caught in a lie?
Bugger off back to the gutter which you oozed out of.
Judging from this we can easily make the assumption that not only do you not rebuttle (and can't spell it) - but your interpretation of 'intelligent rebuttal' is mere insults. Hardly the conduct of a Mason.
I ask you again, why does your posting time exactly correspond to those of the other aliases I have accused you of?
They don't... obviously there is a pronlem with your clock.
Bro. Daniel Brown
Originally posted by Darktalon
Wow, bad case of selective reading. Seems Leveller has brought up many, many points of rebuttal. It is you that hasn't countered those rebuttals. And please, I will go back through all of Levellers, ME's, Alex's, Mine, and everyone else that brought points up, that you have yet to prove or disprove.
BTW- I believe he called you Freemason, cause that was one of your past avatar names, or atleast he thinks/knows it was.