Startling Reveletions. More going on in The Gulf Of Mexico Than An Oil Spill!, page 4


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 14 times


reply posted on 7-8-2010 @ 10:00 PM by justadood
Originally posted by unityemissions
reply to
post by justadood



No, I didn't. I jumped the gun. My apologies. I've changed my post to reflect the new information presented.

Thank you.

Also, am still waiting for your data to prove that algae in water is not profitable.

If you can't back this up, stop making the claim.


My 'claim' is based on the fact that there are already algae farms on land. This makes me think that the model is probably more profitable on land, or there would already be at least as many on water as already exist on land.

Your combativeness is not something I care to engage in. I'm just trying to give you a little more perspective for your theory.


reply posted on 7-8-2010 @ 10:11 PM by unityemissions
Originally posted by justadood
Originally posted by unityemissions
reply to
post by justadood



No, I didn't. I jumped the gun. My apologies. I've changed my post to reflect the new information presented.

Thank you.

Also, am still waiting for your data to prove that algae in water is not profitable.

If you can't back this up, stop making the claim.


My 'claim' is based on the fact that there are already algae farms on land. This makes me think that the model is probably more profitable on land, or there would already be at least as many on water as already exist on land.

Your combativeness is not something I care to engage in. I'm just trying to give you a little more perspective for your theory.


That is not proof that is horrible reasoning.


reply posted on 7-8-2010 @ 10:21 PM by unityemissions
reply to post by justadood



BS. You are a liar and someone who refuses to go over the data provided. The documents are there, and you're choosing to ignore them.

YOU ARE ON IGNORE..

Either you're a disinfo agent, or an idiot. Either way, I don't need to deal with your trash.


reply posted on 7-8-2010 @ 10:22 PM by justadood
Originally posted by unityemissions
You know what, don't even bother. I refuse to try and reason with an idiot. You've been put on ignore. The algae booms are NOT a result of run-off. That's retarded. They have been fertilizing for decades, yet it's only showing up hardcore recently.

The algae booms are a result of deadzones, which are mostly a product of hydrocarbon emissions, chemtrails, and oil leaks. These all result in the acidification of the ocean's, and a resulting loss of oxygen.

Industrial age brought about AGW. AGW resulted in partial oxygen depletion/dead zones. Chemtrails covered up how bad AGW is, hence the decade where temps actually declined, and a consequence of this was increased acidification/oxygen depletion/dead-zones/algae booms.

Whether or not the intention all along was to have this oil leak on purpose, it happened, and it does fall in line with the government's need to transition off of oil ASAP.

It increased the rate at which these algae booms are manifesting. Because the oil is already there, how could you possibly try and compare what's going on with land and what's going on in the oceans?? It's not about profit when you're trying to keep civilization going.. the priorities are a bit different... ya know?


Just, Wow. So, despite all evidence to the contrary, including links i have provided you earlier int his thread, you are going to claim that algae blooms never existed prior to this gulf incident.

That is patently wrong and if you choose to push forward with your theory in denial of this, then you are limiting yourself in your quest for answers.

also, i think calling me an idiot is frowned upon here.


reply posted on 7-8-2010 @ 10:23 PM by justadood
Originally posted by unityemissions
reply to
post by justadood



BS. You are a liar and someone who refuses to go over the data provided. The documents are there, and you're choosing to ignore them.

YOU ARE ON IGNORE..

Either you're a disinfo agent, or an idiot. Either way, I don't need to deal with your trash.


So, again, you hurl an accusation at me, and yet dont back it up.

You engage in name-calling when all I have done is try and educate you on a fairly common subject.


reply posted on 12-8-2010 @ 08:01 PM by unityemissions
reply to post by justadood



Sir, you have repeatedly lied on this thread. Anyone who is interested can go back through the posts and see clearly that you twist my words to fit your purpose.

Shame on you.




Originally posted by justadood
Back it up. Provide the statement.



Right here.



Originally posted by justadood

Just, Wow. So, despite all evidence to the contrary, including links i have provided you earlier int his thread, you are going to claim that algae blooms never existed prior to this gulf incident.

That is patently wrong and if you choose to push forward with your theory in denial of this, then you are limiting yourself in your quest for answers.

also, i think calling me an idiot is frowned upon here.


That is a lie, I never said that. This is one of many you have presented in this thread.

You are either unaware of your lies because you're in denial, else you have an agenda to push my buttons. I don't care which one it is, it's a lie nonetheless and I don't deal with people like you. On second thoughts, I bet you have a passive-aggressive personality disorder. Yes, this makes most sense. Go see a therapist, dood.

Ignore BACK ON!


[edit on 12-8-2010 by unityemissions]
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



New Oil and Tar Balls Litter the Gulf Coast After Hurricane Isaac
  Posted 4 days ago with 26 member flags
Did BP delay sealing the well so they could use it later?
  Posted 2 days ago with 3 member flags
Beach report - St. George Island, FL
  Posted 4 days ago with 2 member flags
Mass die offs still occurring?
  Posted 15 days ago with 1 member flags
Yangtze river turns into tomato juice in China ( picture inside)
  Posted 4 days ago with 1 member flags