It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ShadowRamesses
Could it possibly go beyond the middle east? I believe their goal is in three fronts.
Middle East.
China against India
U.S. against Central and South America.
Then a fourth possibly within Europe.
Originally posted by SteveR
I really don't understand your point. Care to rephrase?
I have Muslim friends that would never murder.
They are not Muslims.
They are fakes and they don't even know it.
The PRIMARY concern for a Muslim is to follow the Qu'ran, Sharia and Hadiths by the letter.
But it is what defines a Muslim, anything else is a fake. Fake like a Catholic who never goes to Church or never listens to the Pope.
Not really. Muslims pride themselves that the Qu'ran has never been tampered with, and is the pure literal word of God.
There are no two ways to interpret commandments to behead disbelievers. Fake Muslims ignore these verses, all hundred odd of them.
The Old Testament was a pretty violent read in itself.
You are cherry picking to make a point. It was superceeded by the New Testament which is the book that Christianity is inarguably based on.
A more valid comparison would be New Testament vs the Qu'ran. We can take a look at that.
I saw your post accusing Israel of being Satan incarnate, but I am too kind to bring it into the discussion against you.
I believe what I believe about Islam for other reasons.
The victims even ASK for this if they have committed breaches of the Sharia. Such is the power of Islam.
Tell me how "Israel will cause the deaths of millions" is more than the ruminations of a fearful mind. If you cannot provide substantial basis for this serious claim, we should just assume it is an empty suspicion.
Like I said before such statements can apply to anything. I am all for free thinking but levelling a charge necessitates evidence.
An Israeli teenage girl is a pacifist. And this is the best case against Israel. Puhleeze.
Originally posted by AnAbsoluteCreation
My point was simply, if we didn't cause Islam's animosity towards us by force-feeding our 'ways' on them
then why did Muslims have to travel here to attack us
Why didn't the millions of Muslims living here stage an attack?
It is a Clash of Civilizations & evolutionary advancement.
But I think they would have the wherewithal to leave us alone until we showed up on their shores.
I believe they are just doing the best they know how. No need to provoke them.
So all real Muslims murder?
The PRIMARY concern for a Muslim is to follow the Qu'ran, Sharia and Hadiths by the letter.
That is coming from a strict point of view.
That is like an extreme christian saying you're not really christian unless you deny homosexuality and mixing races.
It is a modern world that is redefining our spiritual beliefs at all cost. Those left behind are just where we used to be. 150 years ago, Slavery was normal to a god-fearing christian.
Just like you should not use their ignorance as a bold generalization.
Not valid actually. But beneficial to your argument it sure is.
I do think Israel is evil.
I mean, they boast the chosen people and are not afraid to say everyone else is a gentile that is there for their use.
People suffer from all religions. Have you not considered that 95% of media is propagated by Jewish or Zionist outlets? You see and hear what they want you to see and hear.
The victims even ASK for this if they have committed breaches of the Sharia. Such is the power of Islam.
These are isolated cases, dude.
If they had their way the entire middle east would die or bow to their knees.
Palestine prison camp is a great example. Refusal to inform US authority to the 9/11 attacks is another.
An Israeli teenage girl is a pacifist. And this is the best case against Israel. Puhleeze.
No she lives and breathes from the heart. There's a difference.
However, I do love these debates with you.
I cannot see anything more than a bunch of suicidal superstitious fools fighting over a chunk of land because somebody'd great grand daddy may or may not have been attempted to be sacrificed to a God who, as far as I care, stopped caring about the entire matter long ago.
Originally posted by SteveR
I have Muslim friends that would never murder.
They are not Muslims. They have no clue what being a Muslim is about. They are fakes and they don't even know it. Obviously it is a comfortable lifestyle choice for them. But Islam it is not.
Originally posted by AnAbsoluteCreation
I believe Islam as a whole, if it survives, will grow to learn the errors of their ways, just as we have.
Originally posted by pavil
Your worldview of the Islamic religion is way too narrow to apply to over one Billion people.
Karen Armstrong wrote in her review of Spencer's books that he writes in hatred, deliberately manipulating evidence to support his thesis.[22]
"When discussing Muhammad’s war with Mecca, Spencer never cites the Koran’s condemnation of all warfare as an ”awesome evil”, its prohibition of aggression or its insistence that only self-defence justifies armed conflict. He ignores the Koranic emphasis on the primacy of forgiveness and peaceful negotiation: the second the enemy asks for peace, Muslims must lay down their arms and accept any terms offered, however disadvantageous. There is no mention of Muhammad’s non-violent campaign that ended the conflict."
"People would be offended by an account of Judaism that dwelled exclusively on Joshua’s massacres and never mentioned Rabbi Hillel’s Golden Rule, or a description of Christianity based on the bellicose Book of Revelation that failed to cite the Sermon on the Mount. But the widespread ignorance about Islam in the West makes many vulnerable to Spencer’s polemic; he is telling them what they are predisposed to hear. His book is a gift to extremists who can use it to ”prove” to those Muslims who have been alienated by events in Palestine, Lebanon and Iraq that the west is incurably hostile to their faith."
Former Pakistani Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto called Spencer a "radical intellectual" and accused him of "falsely constructing a divide between Islam and West." Regarding Spencer's blog JihadWatch, she said he uses the Internet to spread misinformation and hatred of Islam and presents a "skewed, one-sided, and inflammatory story that only helps to sow the seed of civilizational conflict."[23]
Originally posted by SteveR
I don't think anyone denies there are peaceful segments of the Qur'an. For you, the presence of these verses seems to negate everything else.
If you had watched the documentary closely you will know that many times these peaceful verses were over ruled in the hadiths of Islamic authorities.
In Islam the last book is considered the most valid of all that comprise the Qur'an, the last book is ofcourse the most violent. It is the only book that does not start with Allah the most merciful. That is because there is no mercy in this book.
I think that all Muslims are inherently peaceful by virtue of their humanity.
Clearly humanity and all other concepts are disregarded in the totalitarian way of life intended by the book which is authentic Islam. Islam is a system that leaves no room for interpretation or free thought.
Most honest people deeply involved with Islam will tell you freely that it is a religion of total submission and justice, to them this is a sign of its divinity, to me it is a unwavering red flag.
Despite that 'other side of the coin' you are able to dig up to build weight behind your skepticism, millions are still living under the shadow of Islamic brutality and mental imprisonment.
Bhutto was a sheltered careerist who never understood Islam or what it is like to be an Islamic woman.
Still, she paid with death for breaking every rule of the book.
Saddam Hussein and Slobodan Milosevic were among others on the world stage who warned about the dangers of "radical" Islam and tried to contain it.
It is opinions like yours that would only prolong this suffering.
Someone is biased in that equation, but it is not him.
Their conclusions were heavily supported with an array of Qur'anic verses and historical facts, whereas your counter argument contained none.
I would like to hear more about Muhammed's non-violent campaign. I find it hard to believe someone who beheaded 900 Jews and wiped out entire Jewish tribes believed in non-violence.
I think you are being played and because it appeals to your good nature you are easily controllable.
Originally posted by AnAbsoluteCreation
Or I would rather to only focus on the peaceful aspect.
If you had watched the documentary closely you will know that many times these peaceful verses were over ruled in the hadiths of Islamic authorities.
Question the source/authority.
Spencer claims that since the violent passages come later than the peaceful ones they must trump the earlier. Is that Universal? Jews do not think the New Testament supersedes the old testament, does it? It is a matter of choice in my opinion. What makes them more sacred?
Despite that 'other side of the coin' you are able to dig up to build weight behind your skepticism, millions are still living under the shadow of Islamic brutality and mental imprisonment.
What do you see as an adequate solution?
Bhutto was a sheltered careerist who never understood Islam or what it is like to be an Islamic woman.
Another perspective is that she focused on the good and attempted to modernize it.
True, he led with an Iron fist, but sometimes that is the only way to control barbarians.
I am just not willing to sign up for 'kill them all' tactics.
Someone is biased in that equation, but it is not him.
Why not him?
Which makes these discussions hard because we are correctly defending the position we are standing firmly on top of.
Not really, I did not want to go through each of his positions and point out how he was constructing his position subjectively.
Moreover, I do not have the time or patience to put together such an illustration to support my portion of the 2-sided truth.
How about Pope Urban II and his Crusades? It is what it is, always.
Played I am not.
however your argument has fundamental flaws.
The alternative nature in you makes you just as controllable.
Originally posted by SteveR
The difference between us is you spout a popular line, I think for myself regardless where it leads and I have examined many angles along the way. If I had the patience and time to look, I bet I could not find a single post of yours supportive of Israeli rights.
Originally posted by pavil
You seem to want to exterminate all Muslims.......that is very troubling to me.
Originally posted by AnAbsoluteCreation
I just think it would be possible with the pen if the westerners didn't profit from the sword. It falls into their plans to perceive it as such.
Originally posted by Jewcano
If there is a Jewish master plan, it involves economic growth and developing a nurturing and sustainable infrastructure within the established borders of Israel.