It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Maxmars
I apologize for taking the editorial license to put the word 'credible' in isolation like that. I just have a hard time accepting the label of credibility based on the criteria used by the pollsters and their analysts.
Most high-profile science and philosophy in our history comes from people who were at once either 'crazy' or simply lacked such 'credibility' as the institutions of the day would accept.
Originally posted by Carseller4
Less credible than the scientists pushing for Global Warming, distorting, manipulating, and deleting data to advance their agenda?
I find that hard to believe.
Originally posted by kinda kurious
The denial is pathetic in wake of the evidence.
Originally posted by traditionaldrummer
Please feel free to review this thread which details some problems with scientific consensus.
scientific consensus? It's completely unreliable.
Originally posted by kinda kurious
Originally posted by Carseller4
Less credible than the scientists pushing for Global Warming, distorting, manipulating, and deleting data to advance their agenda?
I find that hard to believe.
Just like the same Drill Baby Drill crowd finds it hard to believe we should suspend offshore drilling.
The denial is pathetic in wake of the evidence. If you don't believe me, sit in a closed garage with your car running for an hour and report back in.
Originally posted by kinda kurious
It is beyond my comprehension to think that any sane and rational person could somehow dismiss the adverse effects of the human population on our planet.