It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
An off-duty Baltimore City police officer fatally shot an unarmed Marine 13 times outside a nightclub early Saturday.
"There was absolutely no physical contact," said La-Belle Scott, Brown's sister. "The supposed officer was not in any harm whatsoever. He (Brown) had his hands up to show he didn't have no weapons or anything."
"My brother tried to approach him, saying, 'Calm down, calm down. All this is uncalled for.' And, the next thing you know, several shots rang out. It was maybe eight or nine shots that rang out, and then, all I know is my brother is telling me, 'I'm shot,'
Originally posted by MegaCurious
I mean, if I had shot someone 13 times then I would be in prison.
Police said they are investigating whether alcohol was a factor. The officer declined to take an alcohol breath test.
Originally posted by ISHAMAGI
I'm tired of all this different laws for different people nonsense!
Either the law applies to everyone or none, NO EXCEPTIONS!
Aside from the obvious boatload of wrong the cop has done here. Anyone shooting an unarmed man 13 times at close range is a murderer....
Those are the facts.
Sounds like Tyrone has a good family, my best to them.
Originally posted by Dookzor
I'm not by any means saying that the policeman was right to unload 13 times into an unarmed man, just that there are already those complaining about the officer seemingly getting away with murder, when infact that is the exact opposite of what the article says.
When you bash the government for doing the right thing
Knee-jerk reactions serve one purpose; they make you look stupid.
Officers typically carry their service weapons while off-duty in Baltimore, but Guglielmi said they should not be carrying their guns if they intend to become intoxicated.
. . . is an unwritten rule among police officers in the United States not to report on another colleague's errors, misconducts or crimes. If questioned about an incident of misconduct involving another officer (e.g. during the course of an official inquiry), if following the Blue Code of Silence, it would be standard procedure to claim ignorance.
Originally posted by Dookzor
I see the point, but I was under the impression that he is allowed to use his firearm off-duty if he feels it's necessary and that being a policeman, it is in everyones best interests ultimately that he is given the benefit of the doubt until wrongdoing can be proved?
Again, please don't misconstrue my post as being in defense of the policeman. I'd just like to know how arresting ANY policeman at the behest of the apparent victims family, is in anyones best interests?
However, I for one would rather incidents involving policeman were thoroughly investigated before actions were taken against the policeman.
Guglielmi said Tshamba, a 15-year-veteran, shot a man in the foot after a confrontation while off duty in 2005. The shooting was found to be justified, but Tshamba was disciplined because he was under the influence of alcohol.
shot at 13 times at close range, with six shots hitting him.
I agree, this scum should get the death sentence. ALL police are just salesmen of crime!
Originally posted by brainwrek
He wasnt shot 13 times, he was shot 6.
Cop unloaded 13 rounds, and 6 impacted.
From the article:
shot at 13 times at close range, with six shots hitting him.
IMO, this cop acted negligently and deserves to be executed.