It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by someguy420
How did they move stones miles from the quarry, that our latest equipment can't even budge?
Originally posted by Harte
There exists no stone placed by any ancient culture that today's cranes cannot move with complete and utter ease.
Harte
Originally posted by Kandinsky
Suddenly we're in Ethiopia! The Ark is described in the Bible as made from acacia wood. Somehow Hancock, characterises the object as an 'out of place artifact' of great technology?!
Originally posted by Kandinsky
The Ark was a box. Egyptians had boxes. They transported stone blocks. From these facts he suggests Egyptians used lost technology to transport the blocks! He is GOOD!
Originally posted by Harte
Originally posted by someguy420
How did they move stones miles from the quarry, that our latest equipment can't even budge?
There exists no stone placed by any ancient culture that today's cranes cannot move with complete and utter ease.
Harte
Originally posted by AmethystSD
Originally posted by Harte
There exists no stone placed by any ancient culture that today's cranes cannot move with complete and utter ease.
Harte
Even the ones that make up the foundation at Baalbek? If so, I am really impressed that the ancients had access to our current construction equipment.
Some of the nay-sayers on this thread seem to not understand that the video interview is not intended to prove anything, in and of itself. It is mostly just a rundown of Hancock's books. One would have to actually read one of them to "debunk" the concepts he talks about.
Originally posted by Devino
I have seen equipment that can handle 300-400 tones and have read about cranes that can pick up well over 1,000 tones but this "done with ease" comment has no place here that's for sure.
Originally posted by NoahTheSumerian
reply to post by Devino
Nice B***h-slap on the old disinfo there Devino. Nice to see someone with a solid raft of knowledge and experience coming to the fore and sharing that knowledge for the greater benefit of the thread. Harte, seriously - stop it.
Nice B***h-slap on the old disinfo there Devino.
Originally posted by AmethystSD
Originally posted by Harte
There exists no stone placed by any ancient culture that today's cranes cannot move with complete and utter ease.
Harte
Even the ones that make up the foundation at Baalbek? If so, I am really impressed that the ancients had access to our current construction equipment.
Originally posted by Harte
Originally posted by Devino
I have seen equipment that can handle 300-400 tones and have read about cranes that can pick up well over 1,000 tones but this "done with ease" comment has no place here that's for sure.
Depends on how you read it, but I know what you mean.
Here's what I meant:
This crane can lift 20,000 metric tons.
Of course, it's stationary so it wouldn't be the first choice, unless you planned to build a Baalbak replica directly under it.
These two to follow are portable, though:
1600 tons
Double the weight of the largest Baalbak stone.
1100 tons