It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by tothetenthpower
I am kind of impressed with the UK for this.
They seem to be one of the only countries not worried about releasing such important intel on their capabilities.
Will other countries follow suite? OR will this be seen as a weakness by rival countries of the UK?
Thoughts?
IMO this is a good thing for everybody. The more honesty, the better we can plan to reduce the numbers to 0.
~Keeper
www.cnn.com
(visit the link for the full news article)
Originally posted by Chris McGee
This is just outrageous, we have fewer nuclear weapons than france. I demand we build more immediately and put the damned french back in their place.
Originally posted by tothetenthpower
I am kind of impressed with the UK for this.
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
The US announcement saying it "would not use its existing warheads to attack non-nuclear states that are in compliance with nonproliferation agreements", does that sound like a veiled threat to North Korea and Iran, that they aren't exempt from getting nuked if they are nuclear powers not in compliance?
Originally posted by curioustype
I was recently advised (by an enthusiast, who I believe had found the stats online somewhere?) that some of the UKs larger underground weapons storage facilities are likely to hold c.300 odd USA nuclear warheads, and he thought they were largely smaller scale devices of the kind that may be used against an advancing land force/tanks (possibly Russian?)
Originally posted by BritguyWe are told week in, week out, that the biggest threat to our peace and security comes from terrorist bogeymen.
Originally posted by stumason
reply to post by Centurionx
That's a bit naive.
Without Nuclear technology, we wouldn't have many advances we take for granted today. Making weapons is just one facet of a large area of knowledge.