It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by spacedonk
A couple of questions if anyone knows the answers:
1. On the magnetic picture, what depth does this go to? Is it relevant? Also what sort of time scale after the original crop circle is the image and are the any more at further intervals? i.e. what is the rate of diminishment of the magnetic reading and does it return in line with the 'full' re-emergence of the crop?
2. When discussing the isotopes found: has the rate of dissipation of these (again forgive my ignorance if they do not diminsih but cannot see a reason why not) been examined to see if they are in line with control samples or portray different characteristics.
Originally posted by Helmkat
Good thread OP, thank you for the information.
However for me, when comparing all the evidence, this still falls into "Human Hoax" work.
There are plenty of ways an alien civilization would be doing this work that would no way be confused with Human works, say alter the genes of the plants in the pattern to display a different color instead of bending the plants or transplant whole sections of field from one location to another. If you can travel through space or cross dimensions this would be pretty easy.
So if this is Alien work, they certainly don't care about making sure they get full credit for the message.
[edit on 26-5-2010 by Helmkat]
Here the "UFO" appears to be a little higher over the car, and smaller. It appears to be made up of light-balls, perhaps revolving inside a light-ring?
"UFO #3," Robbert turns toward Roy & "UFO" now seems to be directly over Roy's head.
UFOs" #53, #54. Is this a shadow of "UFO" in lower left corner of photo?
They did that. Guess what?
To test this hypothesis, we hope to perform these same tests on multiple crop circles next summer.
Source
B. No evidence of anomalous radioactive traces in any of the tested formations.
The samples and controls were not shipped under the same conditions. Very sloppy but why is this important? Because when materials travel by trans-Atlantic jet they are exposed to cosmic rays. What do cosmic rays do? They cause tiny nuclear reactions. They alter the isotopic properties of materials.
The sample set under discussion was airmailed. The other (the one with two controls) was packed in a carry-on bag.
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by Software_Pyrate
What's an "whatever"?
I think people did it. All of it.
[edit on 5/26/2010 by Phage]
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by Software_Pyrate
Showing flaws in the "evidence" is wasting time?
Do you want me to be more specific then? Ok. I think people did it by physically bending the barley down.
Originally posted by Software_Pyrate
reply to post by dragonridr
Very informative....but umm...
There saying ....."the wind did it"
I will read further as I have just skimmed the article but I do not see any documentation other than written by Judy Arndt
Originally posted by dragonridr
Originally posted by Software_Pyrate
reply to post by dragonridr
Very informative....but umm...
There saying ....."the wind did it"
I will read further as I have just skimmed the article but I do not see any documentation other than written by Judy Arndt
If the wind blows down wheat or a board is used patterns occur just like in crop circles. And if you go further they show you blown nodes and elongated nodes. Now we know how this wheat was damaged. But if you look at the part where they show you the blown nodes and i said these where found in a crop circle people would go wow thats not normal. But guess what it is.
When people look for proof to prove there hypothesis this can lead to bad science.
Originally posted by nixie_nox
I have always been curious, do they ever make crop circles in corn?
Is it just wheat? Other then ice, what materials have they taken place in?
Thanks!