Like I've already said: Appleman's math is Contrails for Dummies.
It works, as a basis for predicting the formation and persistence of contrail. But those of us who want to understand contrails, we've advanced our learning.
You choosing to accept it as the final word only shows you choose to be wrong.
Have I not repeatedly asked you to show me evidence that I'm wrong? In 6 months, battling all sorts of trolls all around the net, why has no-one been able to prove this science wrong?
Show me evidence supporting ANY contrails, even ones that last 5 seconds, below 10,000 ft.
Show me the exact conditions required for indefinite contrail persistence.
Tell me what temperature it must be for contrails to form with the biggest, craziest contrail-producing engine available.
Do something other than just making baseless claims and attacks. Amaze us all with your wanton understanding.
Thanks.
