La Raza Violent Threats Ignored, Tea Party Protesters Considered Dangerous Threat to America

La Raza Violent Threats Ignored, Tea Party Protesters Considered Dangerous Threat to America

www.newsrealb log.com

Unlike the Tea Party movement, Revolutionary Hispanic group La Raza isn’t calling for some innocent protests, but for an outright insurrection. Although they accuse tea partiers of racism whenever they dare disagree with Obama’s socialist policies, our left-wing media turn a blind eye to La Raza’s hatred towards whites. After all, to our progressive friends, violence or racism aren’t really the problem: capitalism and democracy are.

(visit the link for the full news article)



Related AboveTopSecret.com Discussion Threads:
“Joe Legal” and “Jose Illegal”

Why oh why am I not supprised? About 2 years a go I put a poll up on Topix and asked the Question: Would you concider Illegals to be a possible Terrorist? www.topix.net...

Yes 43 84%
No 5 9%
Maybe 3 5%
Current Total 51


Thats just my town. I bet it would be close to that nationwide.

So what are we to do?






www.newsrealb log.com
(visit the link for the full news article)

reply to post by OutKast Searcher


Who would that be? The same media that jumped on the NYC truck bomber as a white male probably upset over the health care bill? Where did they get that from? Oh yea mayor Bloomberg of NY.

TPTB just hope that white middle class Americans get ticked off and do something drastic. All the while ignoring real problems.

[edit on 14-5-2010 by hangedman13]

Originally posted by SWCCFAN
Would you concider Illegals to be a possible Terrorist?



Thats just my town. I bet it would be close to that nationwide.

Location: Gulf Coast

1st LT US militia

You know this might just be an assumption but I think you live in a mostly white deep southern town.

Just a tip, 51 people in one town does not make a towns consensus. Nor does it come close to a nation wide consensus.

reply to post by SpectreDC


Be careful of your assumptions. Answer me this.. Why do Puerto Ricans dislike Mexicans? Are they racist? Stop acting like only whites are evil prejudiced types and open you eyes.

Originally posted by hangedman13
reply to post by SpectreDC

 

Stop acting like only whites are evil prejudiced types and open you eyes.

Quote me where I've said whites are the only ones who are evil prejudicial people.

I'll be waiting when you fail.

reply to post by hangedman13


I don't need anyone to tell me drunk rednecks running around with guns with no one to answer to MAY be considered terrorists.

Or just look at the Hutaree militia...obvious terrorists.

reply to post by SpectreDC


Not an assumption at all really...his link to his poll shows his home town...you can't get any deeper south than this.

Bay St Lous, Mississippi

As of the census[3] of 2000, there were 8,209 people, 3,271 households, and 2,064 families residing in the city. The population density was 1,342.1 people per square mile (517.9/km²). There were 3,817 housing units at an average density of 624.1/sq mi (240.8/km²). The racial makeup of the city was 80.23% White, 16.59% African American, 0.40% Native American, 1.11% Asian, 0.05% Pacific Islander, 0.19% from other races, and 1.43% from two or more races. 1.68% of the population was Hispanic or Latino of any race.

And 51 people responding...that is a whooping 0.62% of the population.

[edit on 14-5-2010 by OutKast Searcher]

Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
reply to post by SWCCFAN

 

A lot of people would consider unregulated militia members to be terrorists too.

What should we do?

First off it's not unregulated it's unorganised militia. Critera for the unorganised militia is any able bodied male ages 17 - 45 Not in current service in the Land or Naval forces.

Militia can be called into service by the state Governor or the County Sheriff depending on the state's laws.

The Unorganised Militia is a safeguard aganst tyranny and is core of the second amendment.


"A well regulated militia; being nessessary to the security of a free state; the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."

Do Not attempt to apply today's meaning to those words. To truly comprehend its meaning one should look at the meaning of the words as they were defined in 1789.

No one I have met in the militia has been as extreem as La Raza extreemist are.

reply to post by SpectreDC

You know this might just be an assumption but I think you live in a mostly white deep southern town.

So that inference is racially motivated. A mostly white deep southern town. Playing on stereotypes with that statement. Now I did reach a little at my earlier [okay more than a little]conclusion, but you played the stereotypical white redneck. Xenophobia is 100% universal.

Now Outkast Searcher how are those drunk rednecks any different from drugged up inner city blacks or latinos?

[edit on 14-5-2010 by hangedman13]

reply to post by OutKast Searcher


Are you saying there is somthing wrong with the deep south? last time I checked that is where the majorty of the nations seafood and oil comes from.

This is not the "old South".

reply to post by SWCCFAN

First off it's not unregulated it's unorganised militia. Critera for the unorganised militia is any able bodied male ages 17 - 45 Not in current service in the Land or Naval forces.

No...that applies to those elgible for the draft. Giving your self a name and a rank means you are PRETENDING to be a miltia. Not recognized by the state or the fed.


I think I'll start a militia...and I'm giving myself a rank of General. So yeah...I'm a General...and I outrank you....so shut it...or I'll have you stripped of your rank.

Playing make believe is fun...do you want to be space robots now?

Why does the Mexican government hate the Guatemalans?
Oh yea, because they are crossing the border and entering Meheco illegally.

reply to post by OutKast Searcher

Talk about deflection I thought this was about La Raza not Militia

Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
reply to post by SWCCFAN

 

First off it's not unregulated it's unorganised militia. Critera for the unorganised militia is any able bodied male ages 17 - 45 Not in current service in the Land or Naval forces.

No...that applies to those elgible for the draft. Giving your self a name and a rank means you are PRETENDING to be a miltia. Not recognized by the state or the fed.


I think I'll start a militia...and I'm giving myself a rank of General. So yeah...I'm a General...and I outrank you....so shut it...or I'll have you stripped of your rank.

Playing make believe is fun...do you want to be space robots now?

Yeah ya caught me .... I haven't outgrown my days Playing Army. You have that right to poke fun at me on this forum. However when the SHTF you might want me on your side.

Originally posted by hillbilly4rent
reply to post by OutKast Searcher

 

Talk about deflection I thought this was about La Raza not Militia

Yeah I guess he more woried about me standing up for the Constitution and freedom then he is the Illegal immigrant invasion.

La Raza is a real threat to the local governments. They can very easily take control of a small town.

Just move in register to vote and vote in their people and take over the town with out firing a shot.

reply to post by SWCCFAN


First of all, your "proof" of ignorance is a poll of 51 people?

Second, what are you trying to say here? You didn't really say either way. Mainly just "why am I not surprised?" I really think you SHOULD tell us why you are not surprised.

reply to post by SWCCFAN


When you say La Raza, about how many people are you talking about? Or is this an organization with a website?

More info on your view of la raza

Originally posted by jam321
reply to post by SWCCFAN

 

More info on your view of la raza

I need more information too. Like why is La Raza any more threatening than any other group with views as ridiculous as theirs? Also, I don't know a lot about La Raza (since I never hear about any of their activities, huh, must be that damn liberal media covering up for them) but what do they have to do with "illegals"?