It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by nenothtu
Apologies on my absence. I'm hoping for extraction from this Chinese fire drill in the next couple of days, and will be back then. I'm guerrilla computing at the moment.
Adults who behave as children tend to get my knickers all wadded up, but I ought to be out of this spot soon.
No, the alphabet agencies haven't come for me. The explanation is much more mundane.
Originally posted by Netties Hermit
Some cut and pastes from facebook as per in the first couple of dozen pages in this thread (they have all been deleted now from various facebook accounts - unless someone has kept cached copies?)
Originally posted by CAELENIUM
Judy mentions "subcarriers" and that is my point too. Using a radio frequency as the Carrier Wave one can insert any frequency, in this case the Ultra Violet, as an internal [subcarrier] FM [frequency modulation] second tuning stage. Internal [subcarrier] FM tunings are not affected or attenuated by atmospheric impedance. Only the [carrier] AM [amplitude modulation] Carrier Wave is affected. We use internal [subcarriers] FM tunings in radio all the time so as to filter out the usual AM Carrier Wave "noise" and so as to avoid being detected by enemy receiver stations spying on our traffic. So in actual fact radio telescopes can and do look into the Ultra Violet spectrum, but not as the Carrier Wave, only as an internal [subcarrier] FM tuning stage. One can add such internal [subcarrier] FM tuning stages ad infinitum. I must admit that using the Ultra Violet as an internal subcarrier is rather exotic, but far from impossible, and since we are talking about "alien" traffic, therefore anything is possible.
So all the sceptics criticising Judy for being a fraud, just do not carry any weight in my opinion.
Originally posted by RICH-ENGLAND
once again i will issue a challenge to both judy and wayne: first of all wayne herschel all you have to do is read through this thread thoroughly and check all the information, i would be quite happy to engage in conversation with you to prove once and for all that judy faltskog is a fraud and a hoaxer and was once a man called james van greunen, a known and proven hoaxer. i assure you that all the documents are very very real and are not forgeries in any way, i am also in possession of other documents and other things that i cannot post here for various reasons including the website rules which stop me posting personal information. i can and will get much more if needed but i think its already been proven beyond a shadow of a doubt.
now to you judy faltskog, i challenge you to sue me as i would love to get all the truth out in court and get you in the media and show you for what you are, your silly claims get more ridiculous by the minute and even a school kid could see the gaping holes in your stories and claims!. your claim about the N.S.A wanting us is beyond laughable, you do realise that im english and the N.S.A has absolutely no jurisdiction over me whatsoever unless i went to america and commited some threat to their national security, and i would have to do something pretty serious on the internet to get their attention from england like make a threat to america or hack into an american military or government website.
dont you think its time you grew up a little, i mean seriously haven't you caused enough damage to people's lives in the past, do you not care one bit about your children?.
again to wayne herschel, if you really want to save any credibility and dignity then you should admit that you've been had and denounce judy and this claim as a hoax before its too late. oh and by the way, Michael Hesemann DOES have official documents proving that judy was once james van greunen and official letters, and the passports DO have official stamps on them.
also wayne you have to ask yourself how and why judy and bjorn know so much about mr Hesemann if they dont know him or have had no dealings with him, mr Hesemann is a very very well respected man and is one of the very few people on this planet to gain access to the secret vatican archives, im quite sure someone of such high standing would NOT risk their reputation and career by forging documents or engaging in any of the ridiculous activities claimed by judy.
if judy was not once james van greunen then mr Hesemann would have no need to say anything on this matter because he got out of ufology years ago, why would he suddenly want to make up documents on someone if he is not involved in the subject?, why would judy be of any interest to him if she wasn't once james van greunen?.
mr Hesemann is a best selling author, and a highly respected historian and works for the vatican, he is not some unknown fraudster hiding behind a computer like judy.
if judy owned these observatories as she claimed then she would be able to release any information she pleased, she wont release anything because she has nothing to release and once again N.A.S.A ditched S.E.T.I years ago so judy DOES NOT WORK FOR N.A.S.A!. and also if she owned all these observatories then how come she cannot find the time to look at the stars that you asked her to? the answer is extremely simple but you just dont seem to want to hear it!!!
WAYNE, WHY IS IT THAT WE CAN KEEP POSTING LINKS, WITNESSES, DOCUMENENTS AND EVIDENCE BUT JUDY CANNOT PROVIDE ANYTHING WHATSOEVER EXCEPT RIDICULOUS CLAIMS, STORIES AND FANTASIES WITH ZERO SUPPORTING EVIDENCE BUT YOU STILL BELIEVE HER????.
don't you think that if judy was a real n.a.s.a scientist and we had invented these claims that she would have put a stop to it by now???. any real scientist would have had their solicitor on us and this website like a shot if what we were saying wasn't true!!!