It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Most attempts to illustrate the trajectories of the Apollo flights to the Moon are intended to show only the primary elements of the mission, with little attention to geometric accuracy and scale. One such example is shown below. Unlike these common not-to-scale drawings (www.braeunig.us...), this page takes a new approach. After determining the orbital elements of Apollo 11's translunar trajectory, I've calculated its position versus time and accurately plotted, in correct proportion and orientation, its flight path to the Moon. Furthermore, Apollo 11's trajectory through the region of the Van Allen Radiation Belts has been mapped to show how the trajectory was designed to bypass the most intense areas of the this potentially dangerous obstacle.
The daily dosage of space radiation experienced by astronauts on the International Space Station is roughly equal to 8 chest X-rays per day.
Originally posted by backinblack
reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul
Mate, he admits there are errors in his work..
It would only take a slight variation to increase radiation exposure dramatically..
Do you know his margin of error, cause he certainly doesn't tell us ??
Originally posted by FoosM
When I look at some of his numbers:
Bob has:
008:00:00 7/16/69, 21:32:00
Distance = 77,041,344 m = 47,871.2718 mi
vs
NASA's height = 43,795 mi.
032:00:00 7/17/69, 21:32:00
Distance = 237,706,030 m = 147,703.679 mi
vs
NASA's height = 145,357 mi.
013:00:00 7/17/69, 02:32:00
Distance = 121,598,510 m = 75,557.8111 mi
vs
NASA's height = 71,262 mi.
As you can see, Bob's numbers has the Apollo craft traveling faster by a few thousand miles.
Therefore allowing for the craft to spend less time in the belts and zones of the belt.
Pretty darn accurate in that first 4 hours, well within that 0.013% since the moon is the most significant perturbation the craft would experience (and it doesn't turn out to be much of a pertuberance, as we've seen).
Originally posted by backinblack
reply to post by nataylor
It's not just that though..
How accurate do you think his trajectory is??
Originally posted by backinblack
reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul
Mate, he admits there are errors in his work..
It would only take a slight variation to increase radiation exposure dramatically..
Do you know his margin of error, cause he certainly doesn't tell us ??
Not sure what you're tailing about. The craft never leaves the Earth's orbit. it leaves low earth orbit, but it's always still in orbit around the Earth. And as you can see from his table, the flight path changes by about 70 degrees.over the course of the 72 hour trip there (most of the change coming in the first 4 hours, when it's closest to Earth and, as you would expect, most affected by Earth's gravity. Keep in mind that an object in low earth orbit changes its flight path by 360 degrees (1 orbit) over the course of about 90 minutes.
Originally posted by backinblack
Is it just the way he draws up the trajectory or does the craft really turn almost 90 degrees once it leaves earth's orbit?
That would be odd as it would lose all forward velocity..
It's not perfect. The guy even admits it's not perfect. It's pretty good, though, and a good illustration and exercise. I certainly don't accept it without question. He shows his math, so you're free to go along and check his work, just as I did, and make sure it's all consistent. If you can't or won't, that's certainly not his fault.
Originally posted by backinblack
Yep. lets all just accept one guy has it perfect without question..
Though he freely admits to multiple omissions ..
Originally posted by backinblack
Yep. lets all just accept one guy has it perfect without question..
Though he freely admits to multiple omissions ..
Originally posted by nataylor
Originally posted by FoosM
When I look at some of his numbers:
Bob has:
008:00:00 7/16/69, 21:32:00
Distance = 77,041,344 m = 47,871.2718 mi
vs
NASA's height = 43,795 mi.
032:00:00 7/17/69, 21:32:00
Distance = 237,706,030 m = 147,703.679 mi
vs
NASA's height = 145,357 mi.
013:00:00 7/17/69, 02:32:00
Distance = 121,598,510 m = 75,557.8111 mi
vs
NASA's height = 71,262 mi.
As you can see, Bob's numbers has the Apollo craft traveling faster by a few thousand miles.
Therefore allowing for the craft to spend less time in the belts and zones of the belt.
Bob's numbers are distance from the gravitational center of earth. NASA's numbers are altitude from the Earth's surface. Given Earth's radius is 3,963 miles, subtract that from his numbers and you'll see his numbers are very close to NASAs (and actually turn out to be slightly closer to Earth and slower on the translunar phase due to his ignoring the gravity of the moon)edit on 31-7-2011 by nataylor because: (no reason given)
"Height" is distance from the earth's (assumed by default) or moon's center
Way to leave out the rest of that sentence:
Originally posted by FoosM
"Height" is distance from the earth's (assumed by default) or moon's center
"Height" is distance from the earth's (assumed by default) or moon's center, minus
the pertinent equatorial radius.
Originally posted by FoosM
He admits three important details:
1. NASA has seemingly never provided an accurate to scale trajectory of the flights pre or post the flights.
2. Bob had to plot the path himself. So its not officially from NASA, he is not using their numbers.
3. The VABs are a dangerous obstacle that needed to be skirted.
The Lunar Module Pilot's personal radiation dosimeter failed to integrate the dosage properly after the first 24 hours of flight. To ensure that each lunar module crewman had a functional dosimeter while on the lunar surface, the Command Module Pilot transferred his unit to the Lunar Module Pilot on the fourth day of the mission. The final readings from the personal radiation dosimeters yielded net integrated (uncorrected) values of 640 and 630 millirads for the Commander and the Command Module Pilot, respectively. No value can be determined for the Lunar Module Pilot. The total radiation dose for each crewman was approximately 1.15 rads to the skin and 0.6 rad at a 5centimeter tissue depth. These doses are the largest observed on any Apollo mission; however, they are well below the threshold of detectable medical effects. The magnitudes of the radiation doses were apparently the result of two factors: (1) The translunar injection trajectory lay closer to the plane of the geomagnetic equator than that of previous flights and, therefore, the spacecraft traveled through the heart of the trapped radiation belts. (2) The space radiation background was greater than previously experienced. Whole-body gamma spectroscopy was also performed postflight on the crew and indicated no cosmic ray induced radioactivity.
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
reply to post by nataylor
What an amazing display of dishonesty from FoosM!!
2nd......
Why don't you do the calculations to show how much effect his omissions would actually have instead of posing a ridiculous and illogical extreme?
Originally posted by backinblack
Why don't you do the calculations to show how much effect his omissions would actually have instead of posing a ridiculous and illogical extreme?
Why don't you quit the BS you seem to call others out for???
Exactly what "ridiculous and illogical extreme" did I pose??
BTW, why can't we get the actual trajectory from NASA rather than this guy basing his on "one" set of figures then NOT allowing for ANY course changes as he clearly states ??
Originally posted by MacTheKnife
BTW if you wanted to be spoonfeed the trajectory data in 10 min increments back "in the day", it was available. See the foreward in the link I previously provided.
Perhaps if your Google-fu is strong enough you can find MSC-01855 supplement1, volume 2 today.edit on 1/8/11 by MacTheKnife because: Added pic of MSC-01855 foreward
therefore, the spacecraft traveled through the heart of the trapped radiation belts.
Most Apollo enthusiasts do not know the exact trajectory or how it relates to the location of the Van Allen belts. But they know that they don't know this, and so they frequently do their computations assuming the astronauts passed through the densest parts, and therefore err on the side of overestimating the exposure.
Furthermore, Apollo 11's trajectory through the region of the Van Allen Radiation Belts has been mapped to show how the trajectory was designed to bypass the most intense areas of the this potentially dangerous obstacle...(Although we've been dealing specifically with Apollo 11, all Apollo missions flew similar trajectories.)
Originally posted by FoosM
Originally posted by MacTheKnife
BTW if you wanted to be spoonfeed the trajectory data in 10 min increments back "in the day", it was available. See the foreward in the link I previously provided.
Perhaps if your Google-fu is strong enough you can find MSC-01855 supplement1, volume 2 today.edit on 1/8/11 by MacTheKnife because: Added pic of MSC-01855 foreward
therefore, the spacecraft traveled through the heart of the trapped radiation belts.
Explain it.
10.2.5 Radiation
The Lunar Module Pilot's personal radiation dosimeter failed to integrate the dosage properly after the first 24 hours of flight. To ensure that each lunar module crewman had a functional dosimeter while on the lunar surface, the Command Module Pilot transferred his unit to the Lunar Module Pilot on the fourth day of the mission. The final readings from the personal radiation dosimeters yielded net integrated (uncorrected) values of 640 and 630 millirads for the Commander and the Command Module Pilot, respectively. No value can be determined for the Lunar Module Pilot. The total radiation dose for each crewman was approximately 1.15 rads to the skin and 0.6 rad at a 5centimeter tissue depth. These doses are the largest observed on any Apollo mission; however, they are well below the threshold of detectable medical effects. The magnitudes of the radiation doses were apparently the result of two factors: (1) The translunar injection trajectory lay closer to the plane of the geomagnetic equator than that of previous flights and, therefore, the spacecraft traveled through the heart of the trapped radiation belts. (2) The space radiation background was greater than previously experienced. Whole-body gamma spectroscopy was also performed postflight on the crew and indicated no cosmic ray induced radioactivity.
Originally posted by FoosM
Its all about NASA contradicting themselves.
Most Apollo enthusiasts do not know the exact trajectory or how it relates to the location of the Van Allen belts. But they know that they don't know this, and so they frequently do their computations assuming the astronauts passed through the densest parts, and therefore err on the side of overestimating the exposure.
And people like Bob falling for it.
Furthermore, Apollo 11's trajectory through the region of the Van Allen Radiation Belts has been mapped to show how the trajectory was designed to bypass the most intense areas of the this potentially dangerous obstacle...(Although we've been dealing specifically with Apollo 11, all Apollo missions flew similar trajectories.)
Originally posted by FoosM
This is what I have stated long ago.
NASA shoots themselves in the foot.
www.xmission.com...