It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by gamma 49
reply to post by okbmd
Your smokin way to much crack. Jet fuel does not and will never melt steel and the fuel would have burned up in a matter of minutes next.
f interest is the maximum value which is fairly regularly found. This value turns out to be around 1200°C, although a typical post-flashover room fire will more commonly be 900~1000°C. The time-temperature curve for the standard fire endurance test, ASTM E 119 [13] goes up to 1260°C, but this is reached only in 8 hr. In actual fact, no jurisdiction demands fire endurance periods for over 4 hr, at which point the curve only reaches 1093°C.
Originally posted by ANOK
reply to post by wmd_2008
Room temps do not equate to steel temps, learn about heat transfer.
One hour is not long enough to reach those temps you quote. One tower was only on fire for an hour. That is a LOT of steel to heat up in an hour.
f interest is the maximum value which is fairly regularly found. This value turns out to be around 1200°C, although a typical post-flashover room fire will more commonly be 900~1000°C. The time-temperature curve for the standard fire endurance test, ASTM E 119 [13] goes up to 1260°C, but this is reached only in 8 hr. In actual fact, no jurisdiction demands fire endurance periods for over 4 hr, at which point the curve only reaches 1093°C.
www.doctorfire.com...
Originally posted by wmd_2008
Originally posted by gamma 49
reply to post by okbmd
Your smokin way to much crack. Jet fuel does not and will never melt steel and the fuel would have burned up in a matter of minutes next.
It doesn't need to MELT steel do some research NO let me
At about 550° C (1,000° F) Steel is at 50% Strength and at about 800° C (1472° F) structural steel loses 90% of its strength
House fire and office fires how hot can they get
In only 3 /12 minutes, the heat from a house fire can reach over 1100°F.
Read underlined above
ONLY 50% OF ITS STRENGTH AT 1,000° F, house/office fire can reach that as you see.
If fire was not a problem for steel why do they put fire protection around it See picture below
www.unconventionalsolutions.biz...
Now you have some FACTS think about it.
Originally posted by monkeySEEmonkeyDO
Look at WTC Building 5... On 9/11, that building was heavily damaged, and burnt to a crisp, YET never collapsed... Steel frame buildings dont fall at the speed of gravity b/c of "fire."
Originally posted by LieBuster
iamcpc
from what i remember a stone would take 10 seconds to hit the floor
911blimp.net...
Originally posted by ANOK
Room temps do not equate to steel temps, learn about heat transfer.
One hour is not long enough to reach those temps you quote. One tower was only on fire for an hour. That is a LOT of steel to heat up in an hour.
Originally posted by LieBuster
"Is it possible for steel framed building to be hit with a 500 mile per hour 110-150 ton airplane and then get set on fire and collapse slower than the speed of gravity? "
Lets do the maths
i think it was a 100 tons and this was not dead weight due to the crimple zone on the plane so the energy would had taken two seconds to be obsorbed by the structure of the building.
lets say we have a 100mph wind hitting a 4m2 section of the building then that alone would produce a dead weight force of 1 ton on the building so lets times that by 63 for the width of the building and assume each floor is 4m high and times that by let say 50 floors because other buildings stop the wind on the lower floors.
63 X 50 = 3150 Tons dead weight and the building would take this without a window even falling out so i don't except something made so light as to fly like a bird realy accounted for much more then the 3-4 outer suport beans it took out.
maybe we need more unique curcumstance like it was a windy hot day and this helped the steel get hot and wind added extra energy to the impact of the plane and the concrent had concrent cancer and was not mixed right or maybe we should stick to the arguments about it fell down due to fire and 4 outer clad beams being cut by the impact.
Originally posted by ANOK
reply to post by wmd_2008
Room temps do not equate to steel temps, learn about heat transfer.
One hour is not long enough to reach those temps you quote. One tower was only on fire for an hour. That is a LOT of steel to heat up in an hour.
f interest is the maximum value which is fairly regularly found. This value turns out to be around 1200°C, although a typical post-flashover room fire will more commonly be 900~1000°C. The time-temperature curve for the standard fire endurance test, ASTM E 119 [13] goes up to 1260°C, but this is reached only in 8 hr. In actual fact, no jurisdiction demands fire endurance periods for over 4 hr, at which point the curve only reaches 1093°C.
www.doctorfire.com...
Originally posted by LieBuster
You forgot to mention that steel is a very good conductor or heat or that the towers were over engineered or that the first building to be hit was the second one to fall.
The first building to fall had the HIGHEST LOAD ABOVE IMPACT POINT
Did you not see the images of molton metal dripping out the building and don't try the one about it being aliminium because that does not glow yellow no more than water glows yellow when melted.
Prove its molten METAL STEEL and not something else. Look at this aluminium after a fire. www.debunking911.com...
if you want to see a building thats on fire then let look at this one.
This one didn't fall down in fact prior to 9/11 no steel reinforced concrent building has ever sucumb to fire and fell over and yet this one did.
Were any of those buildings HIT WITH A PLANE FIRST
Thats dust in the background from the towers with only a little smoke in it.
What about the molton metal in the basement glowing orange for weeks and is this scotch mist.
READ here www.debunking911.com...
Why are you ignoring that samples of the metal was tested and it contained all the ingredance for thermite and why do you ignore eye witness accounts.
Read Here www.debunking911.com...
if you light a fire in the side of a building and metal was weakened then it will fail at that point and the building would fall sideways unless of course it's the twin towers.
You mean sideways like THIS
911review.org...g
The towers were worth about $1bn each and yet the day before they fell over congress was told about $2.3tr had gone missing and much of the documentation was held in building seven so this lost money would build ground zero 500 times over and thats what i call a good return on my money.
Quite simply the physics don't stand up to review from someone with A level physics never mind peer review from a scientist but don't take my word for it.
www.infowars.com...
The earth is round, we travel around the sun no matter what the good book says.
Originally posted by LieBuster
prior to 9/11 no steel reinforced concrent building has ever sucumb to fire and fell over and yet this one did.
Originally posted by LieBuster
"Is it possible for steel framed building to be hit with a 500 mile per hour 110-150 ton airplane and then get set on fire and collapse slower than the speed of gravity? "
Lets do the maths
i think it was a 100 tons and this was not dead weight due to the crimple zone on the plane so the energy would had taken two seconds to be obsorbed by the structure of the building.
lets say we have a 100mph wind hitting a 4m2 section of the building then that alone would produce a dead weight force of 1 ton on the building so lets times that by 63 for the width of the building and assume each floor is 4m high and times that by let say 50 floors because other buildings stop the wind on the lower floors.
63 X 50 = 3150 Tons dead weight and the building would take this without a window even falling out so i don't except something made so light as to fly like a bird realy accounted for much more then the 3-4 outer suport beans it took out.
maybe we need more unique curcumstance like it was a windy hot day and this helped the steel get hot and wind added extra energy to the impact of the plane and the concrent had concrent cancer and was not mixed right or maybe we should stick to the arguments about it fell down due to fire and 4 outer clad beams being cut by the impact.
Originally posted by NWOWILLFALL
reply to post by Joey Canoli
That's incorrect...
.
.
.
Originally posted by iamcpc
What about the kader toy factory fire. A steel framed building which collapsed only from fire.
Originally posted by Joey Canoli
Originally posted by NWOWILLFALL
reply to post by Joey Canoli
That's incorrect...
.
.
.
Totally awesome rebuttal dude.
Is there a place on ATS that one can nominate a post for conciseness and the amount of exhaustive research put into a post?
Cuz with this awesome display of perfection, I may have to jump onto the delusional side and claim that 9/11 was an inside job.......