It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by DaddyBare
You would think they would have put more thought into this law...
I mean look at Mexico... they too have some of the strictest gun control laws in the world... 22,700 KIA to date...
Oh sure the bleeding heart libs blame the US as the source of their weapons but let me say... We normal Americans don't have access to rocket launchers handgrenades or full auto machine guns...
Originally posted by Silver Shadow
Yes, crime has increased dramatically since we Australians voluntarily handed in our guns.
Crime has also increased dramatically in America OVER THE SAME TIME PERIOD, where Americans are buying more guns and ammunition as fast as they possibly can.
This all has to do mainly with drugs and the increase violent crime world wide................
I suppose the bottom line is, how safe are you in each country ?
The answer is, you are (at least) six and a half more likely to die in America form a gunshot than in Australia. That is a statistical fact.
Australians still get robbed and beaten up,, but stand a far better chance of surviving a violent criminal attack than in America.
So who is really safer ?
The assaulted Australian with a black eye, and bruised ego, or the stone dead American.
Originally posted by Dr Conspire
You fail to mention the dramatic increase in violent robbery and home invasions in every capital city of Australia since the time period that is relevant.
Originally posted by Silver Shadow
Originally posted by Dr Conspire
You fail to mention the dramatic increase in violent robbery and home invasions in every capital city of Australia since the time period that is relevant.
Sure, homes are robbed in Australia, and people assaulted, BUT THEY ARE NOT SHOT DEAD.
Of course in heavily armed America, no homes are ever robbed, eh ?
Originally posted by auswally
Thanks Tony for your post, you give me hope. other comments about guns from Aussies on here, please read for your own sake
Wally
It has now been 16 months since gun owners in Australia were forced by new law to surrender 640,381 personal firearms to be destroyed by their own Government, a program costing Australia taxpayers more than $500 million dollars - snip -
Originally posted by auswally
Thanks Tony for your post, you give me hope. other comments about guns from Aussies on here, please read for your own sake
Wally
Originally posted by Dr Conspire have you seen what happens to people who are unarmed, when confronted with Phsycopathic armies or individuals?
There was never any gun confiscation
Originally posted by thisguyrighthere
Reply to post by Silver Shadow
There was never any gun confiscation
So what happened to the individuals who didn't want to "voluntarilly" hand their guns in? Surely there were one or two who didn't approve of the measure? Nothing is 100% supported by the people. There is always a dissenting view.
Since it was voluntary I assume they were permitted to continue ownership and use unhindered by the parameters set forth by others?
Or is it voluntary in the sense that you can choose to comply or you can choose to be fined or jailed or have your property confiscated? The later typically being governments idea of voluntary.
Posted Via ATS Mobile: m.abovetopsecret.com
NO one is saying guns do not kill, YOUR SIGNATURE TALKS ABOUT DISCERNEMENT IN DARKNESS, have you seen what happens to people who are unarmed, when confronted with Phsycopathic armies or individuals?
tell me Aussiewally did the diggers go to Gallipoli without guns mate?
Originally posted by thisguyrighthere
So what happens to the people and their guns if they are discovered having them?