It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Subjective Truth
reply to post by Janky Red
I agree 100% and I believe that this has nothing to do with the immigrants but them grabbing more control over all of us. If they wanted to stop the illegal aliens they would hold the employers accountable but they dont WHY?
Its because they dont care and only want more power otherwise they would stop the employment and they would go home its that simple.
Originally posted by Subjective Truth
If they wanted to stop the illegal aliens they would hold the employers accountable but they dont WHY?
Originally posted by WWJFKD
www.azleg.gov...
FOR ANY LAWFUL CONTACT MADE BY A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL OR AGENCY OF THIS STATE OR A COUNTY, CITY, TOWN OR OTHER POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THIS STATE WHERE REASONABLE SUSPICION EXISTS THAT THE PERSON IS AN ALIEN WHO IS UNLAWFULLY PRESENT IN THE UNITED STATES, A REASONABLE ATTEMPT SHALL BE MADE, WHEN PRACTICABLE, TO DETERMINE THE IMMIGRATION STATUS OF THE PERSON. THE PERSON'S IMMIGRATION STATUS SHALL BE VERIFIED WITH THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT PURSUANT TO 8 UNITED STATES CODE SECTION 1373(c).
...
A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER IS INDEMNIFIED BY THE LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER'S AGENCY AGAINST REASONABLE COSTS AND EXPENSES, INCLUDING ATTORNEY FEES, INCURRED BY THE OFFICER IN CONNECTION WITH ANY ACTION, SUIT OR PROCEEDING BROUGHT PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION TO WHICH THE OFFICER MAY BE A PARTY BY REASON OF THE OFFICER BEING OR HAVING BEEN A MEMBER OF THE LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY, EXCEPT IN RELATION TO MATTERS IN WHICH THE OFFICER IS ADJUDGED TO HAVE ACTED IN BAD FAITH.
...
"SOLICIT" MEANS VERBAL OR NONVERBAL COMMUNICATION BY A GESTURE OR A NOD THAT WOULD INDICATE TO A REASONABLE PERSON THAT A PERSON IS WILLING TO BE EMPLOYED.
Janky please don't embellish this thing where in the above document does it say anything you assert about picking on "Brown" people? Were gonna be very lucky if this thing turn into a firestorm without anyone misquoting it.
Originally posted by Subjective Truth
reply to post by Janky Red
We all have common ground if we look hard enough. Just because I may disagree on some issues with you does not mean I will disagree on all of them.
Janky please don't embellish this thing where in the above document does it say anything you assert about picking on "Brown" people?
Originally posted by WWJFKD
There is almost always a better way and hindsight is always 20/20. I think Arizona found themselves in a desperate situation and quite frankly acted desperately. I believe action was required and I do agree with your viewpoint on how this could feed TPTB's agenda and we will have to watch that very closely to make sure this action was in fact in good faith.
It's a real shame that it had to come to this day where a State had to do what the Government refused to do or was certainly inept at.
[edit on 24-4-2010 by WWJFKD]
2. Political power; purpose of government
Section 2. All political power is inherent in the people, and governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed, and are established to protect and maintain individual rights.
3. Supreme law of the land
Section 3. The Constitution of the United States is the supreme law of the land.
4. Due process of law
Section 4. No person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law.
7. Oaths and affirmations
Section 7. The mode of administering an oath, or affirmation, shall be such as shall be most consistent with and binding upon the conscience of the person to whom such oath, or affirmation, may be administered.
10. Self-incrimination; double jeopardy
Section 10. No person shall be compelled in any criminal case to give evidence against himself, or be twice put in jeopardy for the same offense.
13. Equal privileges and immunities
Section 13. No law shall be enacted granting to any citizen, class of citizens, or corporation other than municipal, privileges or immunities which, upon the same terms, shall not equally belong to all citizens or corporations.
29. Hereditary emoluments, privileges or powers; perpetuities or entailments
Section 29. No hereditary emoluments, privileges, or powers shall be granted or conferred, and no law shall be enacted permitting any perpetuity or entailment in this state.
35. Actions by illegal aliens prohibited A person who is present in this state in violation of federal immigration law related to improper entry by an alien shall not be awarded punitive damages in any action in any court in this state.
Originally posted by TrueAmerican
The new law DOES hold the employers accountable in major ways.
Originally posted by Janky Red
Originally posted by TrueAmerican
The new law DOES hold the employers accountable in major ways.
Too bad the rest of it is based upon an unconstitutional foundation -
Originally posted by WWJFKD
www.azgovernor.gov...
The Governors accompanying statement.
As you always say; "ignorance of the law is no excuse" (is that a fair paraphrase?)
To be more candid, I feared you (in particular) might waltz in and lance me in the gut do to my lack of due diligence. Therefore I am very glad to have jumped the shark as they say...
Do you think the immigration situation is a problem considering this current embodiment of government?
If so how would you address it, once again considering the current state of the state?