It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Neo_Serf
Nothing good comes out of Infowars?
Really. This site would hardly exist without the tireless efforts of the Infowar team. I'd be willing to wager at least half of the members here at ATS were 'woken up' by Alex Jones and company. Its stunning to me that on a supposed 'conspiracy' site, a huge vocal minority will derail thread after thread whenever Infowars is cited, unknowning and uncaring that Infowars source matirial is almost always MSN public record, and in the cases that an 'inside source' is used, that info is almost always confirmed later by the MSN as legit. Perfect example: the MIAC reports that almost everyone groundlessly decleared a fraud until the documents were confirmed as real (even Ron Pauls camp couldnt believe it) reluctantly by the MSN.
How about another couple quick examples that people cried foul on but were later confirmed to be true: WTO going to level 6 during the swine flu hoax, and John Holdrens Eugenics manifestio 'Ecoscience'. Both times Infowars was ridiculed by MSN and this site as 'more AJ lies' until confirmed by the almighty MSN and independant journalists, and in the case of the Swine Flu, by the WTO itself. The MIAC report was also confirmed by the state as legit. Critics again fell silent after AJ and companys info turned out to be honest journalism.
So to this random poster from the depths of the interweb, people crying foul and disinfo in general, and SPECIFICALLY in this case when a legit reporter was DETAINED, not arrested for asking legit questions that every journalist worth his salt should be asking, to the prince of darkness HIMSELF...well this random poster finds is disgusting that anyone who values freedom would derail, confuse, or downright disinform people in siding with said PRINCE OF DARKNESS over one of the true independant sources of informantion left in this world. It sickens me, and saddens me, that on a site that prides itself on denying ignorance, that anyone would dismiss this clear violation of freedom in favour of one of the most evil public figures one could imagine. Or ANYONE for that matter. Questions are not a crime! Even if you mistakenly believe everything that comes out of Infowars is BS, if you value freedom, you should support their right to ask any questions they want, and write any articles they want, BS or no!
Sucks that I have fallen into the disinfo trap of debating the execution of the messenger, when we should be talking about the topic itself, which is serious and important to anyone who likes freedom. But this Infowar bashing must stop, unless you feel people like Paul Craig Roberts, Ron Paul, Max Kieser, Gerald Celente, John Perkins and MANY other truth tellers are in on the disinfo campaign and conspire with AJ in a conspiracy against conspiracies to mislead us all with disinfo and lies that somehow almost always turn out to be true.
But this response is a derailment in itself. If the subject matter is true (lets assume it is for sake of argument, and id be willing to bet it is) do we support the police state actions of detaining someone asking REAL questions, or dont we? The way we respond to this is critical to all our futures.
Whos peace are we concerned with disturbing exactly? Is calling someone a liar now an arrestable offence, even when addressing the PRINCE of lies and spin?! Seriously!? Messed up that any of you would support this action, you should be ashamed.
Originally posted by Neo_Serf
So lets stop attacking the messenger and talk about the substance: does ANYONE here support the detainment of a journalist for calling Rove a liar? Simple yes or no will do.
[edit on 20-4-2010 by Neo_Serf]
Originally posted by Neo_Serf
reply to post by K J Gunderson
Fine. Clouds of doubt. Infowars crew insane, and everyone who associates with them. Lets pretend for sake of argument.
Do you support these police actions?
Originally posted by Retrovertigo
Seriously...
If I won a prize on a radio show, and my choice was a dog turd or Karl Rove, I'd choose the dog turd every time...At least I could use the dog turd...I could put it in a bag and set it on fire on my neighbours porch...As for Karl Rove, I can't think of a use for him..
Just goes to show what a bunch of idjits they are down in good 'ol Texas, real mental giants for sure...
I'm amazed there are people here saying "I'm not defending Karl Rove..." when all they've done is exactly that...
Coupla hypocrites on this thread, methinks Not naming names, of course
Originally posted by Neo_Serf
reply to post by alienesque
Even if every word that gets published by Infowars is BS, do you not support their right to spew said BS?
Many a military man has told me 'i dont agree with what you say, but i would die to defend your right to say it.' The very essence of freedom is allowing people to speak unpopular opinions, lies, and whatever other BS they dream up and vocalize. You see, freedom itself rests solely upon the right to voice unpopular opinions. (which the infowars journalists were not, everyone knows Rove is a putrid, undead serpent of unholiness ) ...literally the flesh and blood incarnation of all that is wrong with the world...which is besides the point. I should be well within my rights to call Mother Teresa an old ***** if i so choose
So lets stop attacking the messenger and talk about the substance: does ANYONE here support the detainment of a journalist for calling Rove a liar? Simple yes or no will do.
[edit on 20-4-2010 by Neo_Serf]
Originally posted by zerbot565
first you get jail for asking questions
then they start to ban and modify books/information
then they come for you
wonder how many times humanity must face that trinity of injustice