It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by C0bzz
You have absolutely no evidence that it is not safe to fly in extremely dilute ash cloud, unless you can provide some then judging airlines for apparently putting profits before passengers is simply invalid.
Aviation safety authorities in Europe have lifted bans on flying as fears of the effects of volcanic ash clouds dissipate.
An urgent meeting of Eurocontrol, the European air safety body, has just agreed to lift restrictions in areas where the ash cloud is having no effects.
The decision comes after EU presidency country Spain pushed for a rapid re-opening of air routes where there is no danger.
EU Transport Commissioner Siim Kallas said after the Eurocontrol meeting he hoped that 50% of European airspace would be risk free on Monday.
Dutch airline KLM received permission from aviation authorities to fly seven of its planes stuck in Duesseldorf, Germany, back to Amsterdam, with no affects from the ash blown up by the Eyjafjallajokull volcano in Iceland.
Other airlines, such as Lufthansa and British Airways, made similar flights without passengers.
KLM said that the Boeing 737-800 airliner reached an altitude of 41,000ft, the maximum allowed for that type of jet, and that an inspection afterward "revealed that no problems had been encountered and that the quality of the atmosphere is in order."
www.usatoday.com...
The problem, according to aviation safety experts, is that too little is known about what levels of ash are safe. A jet engineer and the head of a non-profit safety foundation called for extensive new research to minimize the damage in the next big eruption. "It would have been pretty smart to spend $100 million on research to determine a safe level a few years ago," said Bill Voss, president of the Flight Safety Foundation. Al Weaver, former head of safety at engine manufacturer Pratt & Whitney, said that regulators and the industry first grappled with what to do about volcanic ash two decades ago. They never anticipated that it could blanket a densely traveled region. Meteorologists warn that the situation over Europe is constantly changing because of winds and continuing eruptions from the volcano. That uncertainty is bumping up against Europe's need to resume flights.
It will be an interesting experiment. They may only lose 1 out of 100 aircraft. With any luck the eruption will go on for months and they'll get some really useful data, you know, 737s crash lots, A380s not so much and so on and thereby figure out how to make the equipment better able to tolerate the ash. I mean, there are billions of people, right? What's a few thousand dead? Onwards and upwards!
Originally posted by C0bzz
You have absolutely no evidence that it is not safe to fly in extremely dilute ash cloud, unless you can provide some then judging airlines for apparently putting profits before passengers is simply invalid.
Air traffic at Germany's 16 international will remain suspended ‘at least’ until 8 p.m. local time Mon., officials tell NBC News
aviation-safety.net...
Originally posted by InvisibleAlbatross
1982, plane flying through ash cloud lost all 4 engines. You guys still want planes to take off before it is safe?
aviation-safety.net...
There is no proof that flying through a dispersed ash cloud and let's not forget we dont have the numbers or test results to do the math will do any damage to aircraft hence the test flights!
Originally posted by MoorfNZ
There is no proof that flying through a dispersed ash cloud and let's not forget we dont have the numbers or test results to do the math will do any damage to aircraft hence the test flights!
Again - what proof do you want? 1 plane falling out of the sky? 2? Would three convince you?
Plus, think long-term damage to flying through dispersed clouds - think build-up of ash and, if you're transfixed with costs, the cost of a steam-cleaning every aircraft going through it each time it lands somewhere.. and the amount of time that will take.
Tell me has your motor in your vacuum ever melted through picking up cold dust and glass????
Originally posted by Discotech
reply to post by IanC99000310
Yeah because MoorfNZ has a volcano in his/her living room and always has to hoover up that pesky volcanic ash.
Originally posted by IanC99000310
So I say to you sir why don't we agree to let those more EDUCATED do there jobs and when and if they decide to fly in the ash we trust that the EDUCATED have done there job.
“The images show that short-term flying can cause substantial damage to an aircraft engine,” the air force says. Continued operation could lead to overheating and potentially pose a threat to the aircraft and its pilot, it adds.
Five of the air force’s Hornets were involved in a training exercise on the morning of 15 April, just hours before the imposition of airspace restrictions due to the ash cloud spreading from a major volcanic eruption in Iceland.