posted on Apr, 14 2010 @ 10:40 PM
Originally posted by Aquarius1
Dear friends, colleagues and alien hunters - -
We did it. This time, we REALLY did it!
I'm really a positive thinker, when there is something positive to think about. But this "ancient aliens" is not positive thinking for it is aimed
at the gullible. Based on the names that I saw, I know that there will be no actual, irrefutable evidence presented during the whole program. It
will be speculation and assumption. It would probably not succeed in a court of law if it wa a case.
So, I don't think that you and your associates "REALLY did it!" "You thought the original Ancient Aliens was good?" No, it wasn't, it was
downright awful. When you throw out names such as Erich von Daniken, Giorgio A. Tsoukalos, David H. Childress, Peter Fiebag, etc., you know you are
in for a fantasy trip devoid of factual evidence. Erich, forget him. Giorgio, another mixed-up individual. David, hah! He tried to become another
Fred Steckling without the captions! Peter Fiebag, possibly the son of Johannes Fiebag cannot be better than his father who endorsed an
overpixelated photo of a natural lunar feature being called a tower!
Yeah, tell me about ancient aliens 'cause that's all you can do, speak about them devoid of evidence.
But as we all know, this will be a feast for the majority of Aliens and UFOs members who thrive on such ...