It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Two sheep for two pregnant women....that's cheap. Seriously....that's a bad trade.
Originally posted by Rockstar02
Sorry but some of you people are ridiculous. No matter what happens, you hate the military and what they do. They can go ask for forgiveness, bring gifts and apologize, but you call it PR.
Originally posted by Rockstar02
You take every opportunity you can to bash and put down the military as a whole. You don't agree with what they're doing? FINE. Go protest, write letters, take action. But to sit here and criticize from afar is cowardly at very best. I'm so sick and *snip* tired your rhetoric regarding the military, because it's simply blind hate.
Originally posted by Rockstar02
I personally think this is great. By doing what he did, he potentially saved hundreds of lives by stopping a man hell-bent on suicide bombing somewhere.
Originally posted by dfens
Do Vice Admirals serve in the Army or Marines? Afghanistan is quite a ways from the ocean in the regions that matter.
That said, it is a kind gesture. Not sure if it could mean much though. Too many die for protecting their own homeland, and they are labeled terrorists for trying to kill the ones who will kill them.
Afghanistan used to be a sovereign nation. A new party arrives and decides to stop bending over for the west, (via eliminating opium), and they are immediately tagged as a terrorist org. We can't have that, so former EXXON exec Hamid Karzai is installed. Can anyone see the conflict of interest?
Not to mention the "alleged" Caspian Sea pipeline.
What would have been more faithful and demonstrative, would be for the actual officer who ordered the strike to fess up and apologize. Why was a completely different branch of our military forced to beg down?
It seems as fake as our president or secdef saying we are sorry.
My opinion is damage control. If we were really sorry, then we would pull out and leave them alone. Too many private vested interests who insist on pulling this off. The russians couldn't do it.
We helped fund the resistance when USSR tried to do it. Who's to say they aren't paying us back by funding our opposition? The whole- If I can't have it, noone will maxim...
Everyone seems to miss the fact that 9/11 was all Saudis with zero affiliation to Taliban or Al-q-something. According to the official word. They can't even settle on a spelling for one guys name, much less the org he commands.
They could have pinned it on cobra commander and most would eat it up like pudding, given as much exposure its gotten thus far. Never questioning.
Iraq and Afghanistan are unjust and cruel wars. Its legal to bomb people if you have orders. They are not supposed to fight back! But, in America, its illegal to defend yourself against the police. Whether it be local, state, or federal. That includes military. Its the same deal.
It seems like our country is not that important. It seems like its more important to keep killers abroad, (we learned them that,LOL!), than it is to strengthen our own side.
Just my own little rant.
Originally posted by BrianInRI
Does anyone else think it could be possible to use this type of strategy to end "the war on terror"? I am unaware of all the customs in the different Middle Eastern regions, but maybe this type of action could be used to allow M.E's to return to the lives they prefer to live and allow us to bring home the majority of troops as I'm sure someone would try to step into the power vacuum and take advatage. I know, it sounds idealistic and oversimplified, but in theory it may be a better alternative to what we are doing now. I understand it would never happen and why, however I am still allowed to dream