It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by AgentSmith
Isn't this rather misleading, especially as Top Story?
People will start to believe that there was no Meteor at all, when there very much was one!
Originally posted by outsider
I'll have to agree with Agent Smith, the header on this story is very misleading and the relevant part of the story is not a hoax.
Not misleading at all. Meteorites hit, they do not "pass over". Meteors pass over, they do not hit. So, the headline: "Meteorite reported hitting near Olympia Wash is a hoax" is an appropriate, correct, and factual headline for the lead story of this thread. Yes, there are still reports of an actual meteor, but not a meteorite.
Originally posted by worldwatcher Meteorite may not have hit, but it certainly passed over washington and the effects were caught on tape. (see the parking lot video)
Originally posted by SkepticOverlord
Originally posted by worldwatcher
Meteorite may not have hit, but it certainly passed over washington and the effects were caught on tape. (see the parking lot video)
Not misleading at all.
Meteorites hit, they do not "pass over". Meteors pass over, they do not hit.
So, the headline: "Meteorite reported hitting near Olympia Wash is a hoax" is an appropriate, correct, and factual headline for the lead story of this thread.
Yes, there are still reports of an actual meteor, but not a meteorite.
Originally posted by robertfenix
Okay I just read the report from the Seattle paper and watched the three videos they posted on the event. And I can say that someone is not telling the truth.
First off the amount of light emitted and bounced off the ground rules out that this thing was high up. MAX 5,000 feet if not less.
Second after watching the light reflections and the limited scope of illumination on the surroundings leads me to believe that it was traveling straight and fast, just over 2.5 seconds of illumination even at a distance from the video clip at ground level with the fence on the right side leaving you with an almost head on exposure to the flight path. Which again rules out the object being high up as the observation time would be much longer, as well as the illuminessence a lot less.
Third the view from the (on top a building) looking down into a parking lot you can see the direction of the shadwos being cast as the object travels overhead and slightly to the left off the video image. IF the object was higher in the air, the light defussion would be greater and their would be longer shadows being cast. Again adding data to the fact that this thing passed over low and fast.
Forth it should be classed as a meteorite seeing as something that low and with the ability to cast that much light must have had some mass that made it to the surface, if it was just a meteor I doubt it would have been able to throw off as much light
Oh and here is a quote from the paper
Ralph Gaume, head of astronometry at the U.S. Naval Observatory in Washington, D.C., said he knew of no likely source from outer space, such as a passing comet or meteor cluster or shower, but added that meteors commonly appear at random.
Astronometry is the branch of astronomy that measures the size and location of celestial objects.
Anyone else find this odd ?? That the Astronometry branch says it had no clue about this object, and that in fact things can appear at "random" without their knowledge ????? WHAT THE HECK
That gives me a lot of confidence then in their ability as a early warning system.
What if this thing was 10 times the size? Would they have seen it then ????
[Edited on 3-6-2004 by robertfenix]
Originally posted by Muaddib
Originally posted by outsider
I'll have to agree with Agent Smith, the header on this story is very misleading and the relevant part of the story is not a hoax.
The heading of this story is not misleading, its the truth. There was no "meteorite" crashing in Washington, it was a hoax.
Dick Pugh, a meteor expert with the Cascadia Meteorite Laboratory at Portland State University, said fragments of the space rock could have landed in the Chehalis-Centralia area in Washington. "My guess is that we have meteorites on the ground, but the trick is how we find them," he said. "We hope that someone will find a hole in the roof of their garage or barn."
"We haven't had a fireball with a sonic boom since the mid-1990s," Pugh said. "That means it slowed below 700 mph, so that's why I think fragments may have reached the ground."
Originally posted by skullone
My local news station in VA ran video footage of the alleged meteor that was caught by a security surveillance camera. Anyone else seen such a clip?