It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


NEWS: Meteorite reported hitting near Olympia Wash is a hoax

page: 3
<< 1  2   >>

log in


posted on Jun, 5 2004 @ 03:42 PM
Baked , good looking out. Yeh that would be the same footage.

[Edited on 5-6-2004 by skullone]

[Edited on 5-6-2004 by skullone]

posted on Jun, 5 2004 @ 06:34 PM
The real story posted on the Seattle paper website indicated the meteor blew up 27 miles up. Given the flash recorded by the videos, I have to believe the rock was larger than a pc monitor and probably A LOT lower than 27 miles!

posted on Jun, 5 2004 @ 10:36 PM

Originally posted by Banshee
I've clarified the main story a bit, since it seems people are still misinterpreting things.

Well, Banshee, the problem isn't the story.
The problem is the headline, as a number of posters have discussed, which reads:

  NEWS: Meteorite reported hitting near Olympia Wash is a hoax

The problem with this unfortunate choice of wording is
  that if meteorites are found, which,
  judging by various sources, appears will happen,
  that _any_ actual meteorite finds resultant from this event will
  have been pre-emptively declared to be hoaxes.
The core phrase (Subject+Predicate) says it all:
  Meteorite... a hoax

Who are we to believe here?

  - From Associated Press:
 HeraldNet: Meteor may have hit near Snohomish

SEATTLE - A meteor that lighted Western Washington's night sky early Thursday may have landed near Snohomish, a University of Washington scientist says.

The damage is, in any case, already beyond repair.
When one follows a headline in a credible publication,
  expectations should be that the headline reflects accurately the content.
Publications that bait readers with misleading headlines become notorious.

This story is about a hoax attempt on the AP network.
The Subject of the headline might be 'Hoax' or 'Hoaxster'
  or any number of permutations of the storyline.
If you wanted to highlight the rash of coming hoaxes,
  the subject still remains hoaxes or hoaxers or gullible media types,
  unless the story is about the props and methodology of hoaxes.
The story is _not_ about a meteorite.

Those respected folk out there searching for the remnants of this event
  do not need to be painted as being parties to a hoax,
  which is the net effect of the headline.
Those of us involved in the sciences take a dim view of media which,
  by implication or imputation, associates science and its pursuit as hoax.

Could we extrapolate from this that urgent priorities exist
  using headlines to guide readership thinking toward certain biases?
To color discussion and examination of anomalous events as
  most probable hoaxes, to color researchers as being gullible hoaxed?

No, surely not... ...or, perhaps, hopefully not?

<< 1  2   >>

log in