It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by TrickoftheShade
How are these "facts"? Where is your evidence for this beyond conjecture?
He does so in the very article you directed me to. The same article you use to bolster other parts of your outlandish fantasy.
Originally posted by REMISNE
Where does it say exactly that chief Hayden refutes what the fire comamnder decided?
[edit on 9-4-2010 by REMISNE]
Originally posted by TrickoftheShade
It doesn't say specifically that, because the idea that the fire commander decided to demolish the building is a figment of your imagination, utterly unsupported anywhere.
What Hayden does say is that the building collapsed, and that he and others thought it would from 2pm. He makes no mention of demolition. Indeed his version of events specifically precludes it.
Originally posted by REMISNE
Also again i ask, what were all the demo teams doing there at the scene?
Originally posted by gavron
Well, they were not there to "bring the building down".
There is no evidence that a demo team has ever brought down a still burning high-rise before or after 9/11.
Originally posted by REMISNE
been steel buildings collapsing for fire either. There were a lot of first that day.
Originally posted by gavron
So, this was the first time a still burning building was brought down by a demo team? What is your source for that?
Originally posted by REMISNE
No, there has been other buildings that a fire chief or marshall decided to bring down, this might have been the first skyscraper.
Originally posted by gavron
I find it fascinating that these heroic demo teams will go into still burning buildings after firefighters have pulled out, plant explosives or rigged the building to collapse, risking their own lives....
Originally posted by REMISNE
I find it fascinating you never heard of firemen or fire rescue teams going into still burning buildings risking thier lives.
Originally posted by REMISNE
There has never been steel buildings collapsing for fire either. There were a lot of first that day.
Originally posted by gavron
Firefighters do it all the times. Demolition teams, with explosives, do not.
Originally posted by Joey Canoli What you're saying is that there can be no firsts in history, when engineering efforts are directed to prevent it.....
Originally posted by REMISNE
Again where did i say it was explosives, or demo teams? All i stated and proved is demo teams were there.
Originally posted by gavron
ok...so are you now saying demo teams were there, but didn't enter the buildings?
Wow, your story seems to be changing by the minute...
Originally posted by REMISNE
Have to look at facts again.
1. I never stated the demo teams went into the buildings.
3. I hav stated and proven that demo teams were at the site by 3PM.
Originally posted by REMISNE
Well sorry but it does not contridict what i psoted about demo teams being on the scene. In fact it proves demo teams were on scene BEFORE building 7 was down.
Also what were demo temas doing there, just watching the scene? Why would you need several demo teams to jsut sit around and watch what was goint on?
So either the demo teams were called in to remove something form the building or put something in the building.
Originally posted by gavron
So either the demo teams were called in to remove something form the building or put something in the building.
Originally posted by REMISNE
So exactly where is it in that statement that i said demo team went into the building?
Maybe because at the time he was worried about getting and keeping his men safe and had not heard yet that the fire commander decided to bring down the building.
Originally posted by gavronThat would be the words "put something in the building".
Usually putting something in the building means going inside the building to put it. Good lord, Roger....