It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Children might not receive protection from 'pre-existing exclusion' until 2014: AP
Houston Tracy was only a few days old when he ran into one of the most controversial elements of the US health care system: Being denied coverage for a "pre-existing condition."
The newborn from Crowley, Texas, near Fort Worth, was diagnosed with a condition known as d-transformation of the great arteries. The two major vessels that carry blood to and from Houston's lungs are reversed. Oxygen-rich blood flows back to the lungs; oxygen-starved blood flows through his body instead, damaging his heart.
Shortly after his March 15 birth, Houston's parents, Doug and Kim Tracy, were notified by BlueCross BlueShield of Texas that their son doesn't qualify for health insurance because of his "pre-existing condition."
"How can he have a pre-existing condition if the baby didn't exist until now?" Doug Tracy asked the Fort Worth Star-Telegram.
Story continues below...
The Tracys' health care situation is somewhat complex. According to the CBS affiliate in Dallas, the Tracys are small business owners who can't afford health insurance for themselves. They did, however, purchase plans for their two other children.
Originally posted by St-Patrick
OMG! Is this really happening in the US ?
Originally posted by hthjason
This wouldn't happen here in Canada. The downside here though: the required procedure might take more time to happen then in the US, if she wasn't denied care.
No death squads. Now mindja....Revenue Canada (our IRS) isn't about to withhold tax returns for health care,either.
Jason
Originally posted by v3_exceed
Originally posted by hthjason
This wouldn't happen here in Canada. The downside here though: the required procedure might take more time to happen then in the US, if she wasn't denied care.
No death squads. Now mindja....Revenue Canada (our IRS) isn't about to withhold tax returns for health care,either.
Jason
I was going to mention that the baby would probably be fine in Canada, as we often bump extreme instances like this to the front of the line.
However...Revenue Canada will hold your return for non payment of your health insurance and the health insurance act WILL take your wages if you don't pay them, but you wont be denied coverage. Read the fine print, I was in this situation when I was 18, and just by being covered you agree to a whole bunch. Now, the upside is you will always be covered, but you better make sure you stay current with the health insurance payments... +/- 40$ a month...depending on income in many areas.
..Ex
Originally posted by whaaa
rawstory.com...
Is this the situation that the "for profit" medical industry has brought us to?
I don't know what the solution is, but for a nation that prides itself to being one of the "good guys" to sacrifice it's young for profit; It's hypocritical and just wrong.
It's a brave new world, welcome to the monkey house.
[edit on 27-3-2010 by whaaa]
Originally posted by truthquest
So again, if you don't like it, help fix it YOURSELF and ask people to join you. Again, I'll gladly send you basically all the ideas in the world on how this could be done.
Originally posted by blackthorne
reply to post by kozmo
this is the republican ideal! profit over all! the libs wanted a public option or single payer. but nooooo, profit must come first. do not try and pin this on obama. the repubs had 8 years in charge and did nothing!