posted on Mar, 25 2010 @ 03:38 PM
Pornography, in my opinion, degrades all involved: the participants and those who sit there drooling and masturbating -- or who grab the nearest body
to sate their artifial lust -- or who sate that lust on their own children -- spouse -- the Avon woman who just happened to knock at that moment -- or
a blow up doll
To me, there could be nothing more pathetic than one or more adults watching other adults engaging in simulated sex and perversion
Pron reduces humans to the level of bonobos
How many children are conceived each hour because of porn ? Would you like to learn you're here on this earth simply because one or both of your
parents had become aroused after watching pornography ?
The Italians have a saying: ' Walk with cripples and you learn to limp '. Some will understand its relevance within this discussion. Others will
grasp the insideous effect of porn upon society and will know it is intentional, deliberate
If a man (or woman) needs porn to become sexually stimulated, rather than genuinely desire the sexual partner, then the relationship is fake, a fraud,
is worthless, is debased
I would be revolted, repulsed, if I were approached by someone fuelled by pornography
Many people watch pornography and then use their partner's body as a mere receptacle -- the way they'd use a handful of tissues or go to the toilet
to relieve a full bladder. I guess there are those who don't mind being used as a receptacle for second-hand lust, but imo, they and those who use
them are a travesty of humanity --- they're refuse, have no self-respect and no respect for others
For example, I wouldn't do business with someone who watched porn. I've walked out on business lunches when fat, middle-aged, low-brow, valueless
morons began telling filthy jokes about women (is it mere coincidence that most of the jokes are about women ?)
As for 'soft porn' i.e., gratuitious use of the female body to sell product -- what is it saying ? Of course, there are the masturbatory-types who
would never understand and don't care. They're the lowest common denominator and are the targets of such advertising -- they're one step up
(debatable in itself) from bonobos
What sort of attitude do such advertisements encourage ? Well, I know a man almost in his 70s who (as result of 'cheesecake' advertisements,
stippers, etc.,) who believes, actually believes that women were put on this planet to service him, to arouse him, to be subject to his
scrutiny and choice. He watches 'Miss Universe' type shows and presumes to sit there in the role of 'consumer'. He behaves as if he's an art
expert and even assumes a haughty voice and demeanor, making comments such as, ' She's too fat around the thighs. That one could do with bigger
breasts. Don't think much of that one, she's too skinny', etc. The irony is, according to his spouse --- he's near impotent and has been,
life-long --suffers from chronic premature ejaculation !
When women allow themselves to be paraded as product, it encourages men to regard women as consumer items
Not all women regard themselves as consumer items, however. But many men don't bother (and/or are ubable) to differentiate. This results in news
items about the employer accused of treating his female staff as meat. The employer is often genuinely baffled. He believed that because he paid his
female staff that he owned them. He and his ilk claim to despise 'women's lib'. To them, women's liberation makes as much sense as
vegetarianism, when we all know, don't we, that men are the natural butt-kickers on this planet and animals and women are here for a purpose -- God
gave women and animals to men to make life fun
The irony is that when the vast majority of men regard billboards featuring a semi-naked female as an insult to women (and men)generally,
rather than as a stiffening in their pants -- then those billboards and the traitors who pose for them will be redundant
Some men might claim that the day men stop reacting to the sight of a semi-naked female is the day men will have surrendered to wussiness and
'women's lib'. They'll claim that a 'real man' is 'supposed' to react to women. They'll also claim that 'real men' enjoy porn 'and
there's nothing wrong with that'
Then they'll have the gall to talk about evolution
No, jealousy is not 'the reason behind feminism and consorship'. But you have to possess an IQ above 100 to realise that, I'm afraid. Some
people will never grasp it. They're basically animals in clothing. But it might help them to evolve if they realise that females comprise slightly
above 50% of the world's population. For some, this will be news. Because they've never thought of things that way
But yes, females comprise 50% of the world's population. There are more females in the workforce than males. Females make the majority of
purchases. It's generally females who decide the purchase of major items such as houses and cars, overseas trips, furniture and clothing, not to
mention cosmetics, groceries, home-improvement items, etc. See --- not only are women half of the world's population -- they also control the
economy, basically
Women also provide the world with future generations -- of consumers. Women live longer than men, generally. They are not the 'weaker sex' at all
Which is why there are such concerted attempts to portray them as 'secondary' to men -- as in bikini-clad bimbos stretched across the hoods of cars,
for example
For those who're still finding it difficult to grasp, simply reverse the process
Imagine if new car commercials featured a buff young guy in a thong, stretched across the hood
Imagine a gorgeous male hunk with rippling abs smiling at you from your family tv and telling you sexily to buy this can of paint, or this loaf of
bread
Imagine driving to work with huge billboards on either side of the highway featuring gorgeous young guys advertising underwear, condoms, chain-saws
and tinned peas
Imagine opening your newspaper to see photos of sexy young guys posing their almost naked bodies .. for no reason other than to titillate women
Imagine male secretaries bringing cups of coffee and taking messages for their female bosses
Imagine saying to your children, ' Just wait until your mother gets home ! '
Imagine banks requiring telling men that they'll need a female to countersign their loan application
Get the picture now ?
No, it's not jealousy behind consorship and feminism. Many men support both ... men who possess their fair share of testosterone
Censorship and feminism, at core, attempt to assist evolution become reality -- for all