It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by InvisibleAlbatross
reply to post by cjcord
This is a complete strawman. They did not pack up the kids to go "see what this looks like." They went in to rescue the wounded. They were heroes.
Originally posted by SonicInfinity
So wait, is this video important or not? From some of the replies I'm seeing in this thread, some posters are trying to justify every single action taken in the video as "war" and that Wikileaks hasn't released anything special. This video, the 7.2 earthquake, the shuttle launch, and unemployment benefits being lost to millions, and what do I see on CNN?
Tiger Woods returns to golf.
Originally posted by hungrydirt
Originally posted by InvisibleAlbatross
reply to post by cjcord
This is a complete strawman. They did not pack up the kids to go "see what this looks like." They went in to rescue the wounded. They were heroes.
Hm, then maybe, just maybe, the kids didn't belong in a battle-zone to begin with. How the hell is it a strawman argument to assert that these idiots in the van put their kids in the line of fire?
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
Originally posted by hungrydirt
Originally posted by InvisibleAlbatross
reply to post by cjcord
This is a complete strawman. They did not pack up the kids to go "see what this looks like." They went in to rescue the wounded. They were heroes.
Hm, then maybe, just maybe, the kids didn't belong in a battle-zone to begin with. How the hell is it a strawman argument to assert that these idiots in the van put their kids in the line of fire?
Did the children have their own input? How do you know it was battle? The "AK's" also look like camera stands. The "RPG's", which i cannot find evidence of, are likely cameras. What makes us believe that ANY of those people were terrorists or anything other than law abiding citizens?
The only word we have is that of Uncle Sam, who is not known for being forthcoming with truth. Other than that, we have what we can all see in that video...and that, to me, is only conclusive in showing that we likely acted wrongly.
Are you saying that Iraqi's should not be in Iraq? It wasn't a battle zone until the US made it so (for right or wrong). Should the people of Iraq just pick up and move until we decide to stop shooting them?
[edit on 5-4-2010 by bigfatfurrytexan]
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
Did the children have their own input? How do you know it was battle? The "AK's" also look like camera stands. The "RPG's", which i cannot find evidence of, are likely cameras. What makes us believe that ANY of those people were terrorists or anything other than law abiding citizens?
The only word we have is that of Uncle Sam, who is not known for being forthcoming with truth. Other than that, we have what we can all see in that video...and that, to me, is only conclusive in showing that we likely acted wrongly.
Are you saying that Iraqi's should not be in Iraq? It wasn't a battle zone until the US made it so (for right or wrong). Should the people of Iraq just pick up and move until we decide to stop shooting them?
[edit on 5-4-2010 by bigfatfurrytexan]
Are you saying that Iraqi's should not be in Iraq? It wasn't a battle zone until the US made it so (for right or wrong). Should the people of Iraq just pick up and move until we decide to stop shooting them?