Niagra Falls exclusive ufo video from 2009

www.youtube.com...


this kinda gave me the chills a little from the realness of the video. even though the camera man never shows his face or others i think the video is still real. what do youll think?

[edit on 21-3-2010 by blaws572]

Is there any images from the exact same viewpoint as this shot was taken but from in the day time? I'm leaning towards some kind of object either supported by cables or a building of some type. Until a daytime image can be compared side by side, that object could literally be anything, especially since the photographer never gives any points of reference for any considerable amount of time during the video.

Wow i dont know what to make of that. The light definately get interupted by something that remains stationary throughout.

The poster above is right. You need a comparison shot taken in daylight. It could have just been an advertising blimp for some event. I wish the vid was a bit clearer.

I dont think this is fake, but i could'nt say that its definately a UFO either.

Interesting stuff though, thanks for posting.

Now that is pretty good. I mean WTH? Do ET's need honeymoons too? That's a pretty impressive piece of footage, there. Nice find. Just looking at the video it seems that there is no logical explanation, at least for me, anyhow...... Hasn't there been a flap of sightings over the falls within the last little while? I think there has been if I'm not mistaken.

Again, nice find OP!

It could be anything. Including a hoax.

shivercanada -- the youtube poster, has quite a variety of UFO youtubes, the most recent was yesterday, 20 MAR 2010.

23 NOV 09 - Niagra Falls Youtube

7 & 8 DEC 09 - Niagra Falls

27 DEC 09 - Niagra Falls

15 NOV 09 - Niagra Falls

20 MAR 10 - Niagra Falls

02 FEB 10 - Niagra Falls

The OP video looks to be about the most clear view.

I really don't understand the search lights in this.

IMO, an actual intelligently controlled craft would move out of an automated linear oscillating search light beam - but instead the "craft" stays int he same spot, right in the path of the beam??

Highly unlikely.

if you see on youtube there are actually a few different shots of this from several people

reply to post by Nick_X


They aren't search lights, I believe they are spotlights outside of a casino.

Well to me because the darkness I just cant say what shape is actually there. Im thinking maybe because the original author of the vid says he saw a triangular shape leads us to think we se one as well? I dunno but the power of suggestion needs to be respected. All I see is a obvious moving searchlight and a odd configuration of light in the sky. By definition its a UFO...unidentified, flying object..but beyond that I wouldnt dare to conjecture.

New video here.I don't know what to think of it,there are lots of witnesses as well as pics and video.

In the new video:
Notice the "pyramid" shape, similar to what was filmed a few months ago over the Kremlin? Wasn't that shape also seen in China recently?
I wonder what the significance of the pyramid shape is...


[edit on 22-3-2010 by ghr54321]

Originally posted by Nick_X
I really don't understand the search lights in this.

IMO, an actual intelligently controlled craft would move out of an automated linear oscillating search light beam - but instead the "craft" stays int he same spot, right in the path of the beam??

Highly unlikely.

Why? We arent even a class 1 civilization, if this is a class 2, we are ants to them. Why should it have to move out of the way of the spotlights? Because YOU would?

The fact that you think you have the same reasoning skills as an interstellar race is "Highly unlikely."

I dont believe in aliens, none that have come here yet atleast.

In DarkKnight We Trust.

This one gives you a *Little* bit more of a point of reference.

www.youtube.com...

Would be helpful if people actually posted more than just 2 tiny minutes of video footage...

Jocko Flocko that YouTube video was from October, 2009.

And if this is some little hoax using a helium tethered object attached to the Skylon as some advertisement gimmick, it is in blatant violation of Canadian and US airspace regulations so I highly doubt any company would risk such massive fines...

Here's a previous thread started on the day of the original sightings back in Oct 09'.

Seems like many people have seen it and from various angles too.

I'm gonna call man made (possibly a balloon) but I'm open to being completely wrong.

-m0r

I just sent an email to Nav Canada to alert them about the incident, I would imagine they already know about it though as other pilots will have probably already reported the incident. If it is indeed a tethered balloon, someone will be forking over quite a large sum of money and possibly facing time in prison as the airspace above the falls is frequently used by many tour companies using general aviation aircraft that fly at low altitudes.

Seriously though, this guy maintains that he has filmed this for hours but has never made any attempt to illuminate it himself for filming, he just relies on the search lights from the casino. You can buy those super bright 1,000,000 watt torches from most hardware stores. I have seen people light up the fuselage of airplanes with these (dangerous I know, but kids will be kids). Even when someone takes a photo that is too dark, they turn on the flash, problem solved (duh)

So come on folks if you are serious about capturing these things on film, please make an effort instead of churning out dark blurred footage. Camcorders are not really very good at filming in the dark, they need a bit of a helping hand.

That object could be anything from the top of a building to a electricity pylon !!

reply to post by Jocko Flocko


OK lets discount the blimp theory for the reasons you've out lined. Could the flash be the result of two light sources meeting and becoming brighter momentarily as opposed to a reflection off something.

Some of the shapes that crop up just dont seem UFO like if you know what i mean. They always appear to be in the same area aswell.