It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Aftermath: Unanswered Questions About 9/11 (Full Video)

page: 1
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

+33 more 
posted on Mar, 19 2010 @ 11:12 AM
From the Sundance Award-winning documentary producers GNN, this film poses questions that continue to overshadow and critically challenge the administration's official version of the story, and is a must see for those who continue to question the terrible and as yet unexplained events of that day.

With the increasing controversy surrounding the federal probe into the September 11 terrorist attacks, GNN decided to pre-empt the government and produce its own version of a ‘truth commission’ with AFTERMATH: Unanswered Question from 9/11. What did the Bush administration know and when? Should airlines have been more prepared for 9/11? What ties did the US government have, if any, with the terrorists?

AfterMath delves into the troubling span of issues that have arisen since the attacks on 9/11, including: the negligence of military officials in reacting to the hijackings; proven links between the hijackers, Pakistani intelligence (ISI) and the CIA; the role of oil in the Eurasian conflict; and the impact of post-911 legislation on American civil liberties.

The film poses questions that continue to overshadow and critically challenge the administration’s official version of the story, and is a must see for those who continue to question the terrible and as yet unexplained events of that day.

Extras Over 90 minutes bonus footage Extended interview clips Live panel discussion featuring George Soros, Mike Ruppert, Nafeez Ahmed and more!

Narration and original score by hip-hop legend Paris.

"Everything you wish the news was... [Aftermath] serves as a primer to understanding 9-11 with both a compassionate and critical eye."

(click to open player in new window)


This video is provided by The Disinformation Company, whose online distribution agreement with the video publisher is limited to the United States and Canada. Unfortunately, free streaming is not yet available for users in other countries.

posted on Mar, 19 2010 @ 11:19 AM
It would be great for us UK users to be able to view this somehow? I understand that is costs to produce this BUT... :-)


posted on Mar, 19 2010 @ 11:21 AM
This looks interesting... what a shame those outside US/Canada can't watch it

[edit on 19-3-2010 by Internet Explorer]

posted on Mar, 19 2010 @ 11:23 AM
Any feedback from the American/Canadian members for us here who cannot watch it??

BTW Nice to know that something like this is up still.

[edit on 19-3-2010 by Rising Against]

posted on Mar, 19 2010 @ 11:28 AM
reply to post by Rising Against

I just got the U2U notification. After I watch the video I will try and make some sense of it, and outline the "unanswered questions" to those outside US/Canada, unless someone beats me to it

I have an idea where this is going but knowing ATS this will be good because it is from them.

posted on Mar, 19 2010 @ 11:35 AM
reply to post by Smell The Roses


Thanks for any feedback from all members in advance.

posted on Mar, 19 2010 @ 11:36 AM
I am DONE with "explanations"... I do think that 911 was staged, but NOT by the bunglers of any particular American administration. It had all the earmarks of a Global Union job, inasmuch as TPTB are the actual owners of al Quaeda. 911 was just another in a long string of attempts to frighten the American people into accepting this socialist nanny-state we find ourselves battling at this very moment.

And, yes, Manmade Global Warming, International Terrorism, SARS and every other hysterical crisis is part and parcel of the New World Order's agenda to drive you into the loving arms of your Big Daddy Satan.

Sometimes it gets lonely here at the top, being right all the time; but I find some small consolation in knowing I'll have 143,999 like-minded neighbors when this whole mess finally comes crashing down.

— Doc Velocity

posted on Mar, 19 2010 @ 11:41 AM
Ugh, not able to view it here in Europe.

I'll have to try to get my hands on the DVD or something. Thanks for bringing it to my attention though, looks interesting.

posted on Mar, 19 2010 @ 11:54 AM
One thing stated is that the head of Pakistan gave $100k to Atta and met with George Tenet during the same week.

It's slightly different from what I've seen before regarding 9/11. Alex Jones is interviewed though. I don't have anything against him.

posted on Mar, 19 2010 @ 11:57 AM
Cant watch it here in the UK without paying.......! hmmmm, capitalism rules !

posted on Mar, 19 2010 @ 11:58 AM

Originally posted by Valorian
It would be great for us UK users to be able to view this somehow?

Yes it would.

We're trying to get the streaming online license deal with DisInfo expanded to cover additional continents, but it also relies on their contract with the producers of this title.

At least, however, this is up and online (legally), and generating income for those who produced it.

posted on Mar, 19 2010 @ 12:01 PM
They knew they couldn't cover it up for ever. The truth will come out no matter how many people they kill. The problem is will people wake up in time to do anything, or will the .... s I don't have words, attempt a total takeover and turn us into something worse than Nazi Germany. They actually tried to genocide the Germans after WWII but Truman finally stopped it. Human life is not a problem for them. America needs to prepare for the worst.
The question concerning why the military was not able to intercept the planes brings to mind the Youtube stand-down film about JFK's Secret Service link
Question 5 about the US funding the terrorists ties in the Rev Manning's planned treason trial for Obama. He claims that Obama was employed by the CIA while he was ostensibly attending Columbia to pass money to Al Qeada type groups in Pakistan and Afghanistan It would be funny if he were a friend of Osama ben Laden. both being proteges of Brzezinski

[edit on 19-3-2010 by m khan]

posted on Mar, 19 2010 @ 12:13 PM
I love how John Judge brought up Canada. It's weird, because I alwyas think about canada and how it has never really experienced terrorism, esp on a large scale. 'But it has a very different foreign policy...' hmmmmm

posted on Mar, 19 2010 @ 12:13 PM
reply to post by SkepticOverlord

Many thanks SO, appreciate the efforts anyway :-)

posted on Mar, 19 2010 @ 12:27 PM
To south tower explosion in real time broadcast, if that was true.
To subsequent conspiracy developments on the net.

The Airline suit might bring out a discovery of what the airlines
did but not to sure if any conspiracy theories will be validated.
I did not think past the official goings on until looking at how the
911 topic had skyrocketed onto net forums.
I did some net research and found that data from the airlines
was lacking as far as flights and such.
So as far as that researcher was concerned, the fight was canceled
or other wise vapor flights.

So was there an airline connection.

Then videos started showing up and I recalled seeing the south
building explode in real time but no airliner. I can't say much
about other TV coverage like nose in nose out.

Then many videos of non TV footage started showing up.

So there is an apparent no airliner and floor collapse by removing
the floor hangers to the core beams. The external beams should
breakaway as we have seen on the videos.
With no core beams left the beams would have to be damaged
with the fasteners and a fair amount of aluminum to dissolve
parts if that can happen.

So thats the un official story that I summarize.
Not so good as passenger are missing and the explosive setup
can't be verified even though perhaps easier than not having

ED: Instead of aftermath there should be a foremath.

[edit on 3/19/2010 by TeslaandLyne]

posted on Mar, 19 2010 @ 12:37 PM

Originally posted by Smell The Roses
reply to post by Rising Against

I just got the U2U notification. After I watch the video I will try and make some sense of it, and outline the "unanswered questions" to those outside US/Canada, unless someone beats me to it
I had the same idea but if your take is different than mine go ahead and post yours too.

The thing that I've always been outraged about is the patriot act not expiring when it was supposed to expire, they keep extending the damn thing, so my notes are a little bit biased with more detail about that. The rest is interesting but not really that convincing to me.

My notes taken while viewing:

1 To what extent should airlines have been prepared?

9/11 was sort of a repeat of a 1970 hijacking. So they should have known planes can be hijacked.

2. What did the Bush administration know?

The previous year, drills were done for crashing a plane into the Pentagon, so they can't say they never thought something like that might happen.

3. Why wasn't the US military able to intercept the hijacked planes?

It took 30 minutes to scramble planes, should have only taken 10 minutes

4. How did the administration respond to the failures of the military and intelligence agencies?

Instead of being demoted, General Myers was promoted to chief of staff after the failure.

5. What ties, if any, did the US Govt and intelligence agencies have with the terrorists or their supporters?

They claim that al-qaeda is being used as an intelligence resource even though it's not pro-American.

The FBI confirmed that Pakistan's General Ahmad had authorized a $100,000 wire transfer to Mohammed Atta, the terrorist ringleader. Ahmad was meeting with Colin Powell and others in Washington so it looks suspicious.

6. Were there plans for a war in central Asia prior to 9/11?

The previous military adviser to former presidents wrote a book saying getting control of central Asia would be a good strategy.

7. Is there an underlying motive, besides the war on terror, for the US military presence in central Asia?

The video claims the US may be after the oil reserves.

8. Is there any historical evidence to suggest that the government may have used the 9/11 attacks to justify its war in central Asia?

Alex Jones says the US blew up its own ship to have an excuse for the Spanish American war. Refers to the Northwoods document, which calls for shooting civilians, terrorizing cities, and blowing up ships.

9. How has the government's reaction to the terrorist attacks impacted the rule of law in the US?

John Judge researched civil liberties, says DOD FEMA and NSA have been running the country since 9/11.

10. How has recent legislation like the patriot act and homeland security bill affected the lives of American people?

It's patriotic to defend the constitution, and what the patriot act does is dismantle the constitution so it's named the opposite of what it really is. It created a new crime called "domestic terrorism" with a definition of "activities that involve acts dangerous to human life, that violate the laws of the US or any state and appear to be intended to influence the policy of the government by intimidation or coercion"

Intimidation and coercion are very mild words, for example, what about workers going on strike, is this a form of coercion?

Martin Luther King would have been a domestic terrorist under these broad definitions, it claims.

Sneak and peek provision- police can search your house without a warrant while you're not home.

Enemy combatants can be held indefinitely, no due process.

Homeland security act gives access to "...internet, library cards, bookstore records, medical records, school records, phone calls" which expanded on that the patriot act did, no area of our lives is free from intrusion now.

11. What can we do?

People need to organize at the local level, to request repeal of the patriot act, etc.

[edit on 19-3-2010 by Arbitrageur]

posted on Mar, 19 2010 @ 12:44 PM
a very well produced documentary about 9-11.
Star & Flag

It is my belief that TPTB hired Al Queda to perform
this function, gave them intel, support, access, training and
a basic outline of what they wanted them to do just like
a mafia figure would hire a hitman to eliminate a threat
on the street. except this plan's complexity was exponential
in depth. Find a hitman willing to die for their cause and give
them money and waalaa, 9-11.

Probably first time in history that Jews and Muslims working
together to perform a terrorist act. However, the jihadist probably
had no idea, the Jews were working an angle.

posted on Mar, 19 2010 @ 01:29 PM
reply to post by

Should be required viewing for all ATS members. This taken from the score : "What would you do if you , knew all the things we knew , would you stand up for truth , or would you turn away too..." Step back non-believers, the Truth will prevail. Thanks to Staff for bringing this onboard.

posted on Mar, 19 2010 @ 01:36 PM
Ok, so I watched it. Not a bad film by any means, but to the dedicated 9/11 researcher, there is nothing at all groundbreaking about this film at this point.

We're way beyond this. For instance, the film makes no mention of the change in military policy over the treatment of hijackings, only a couple months before 9/11 that would allow the cabal at the highest levels of government to pull off these attacks without the planes getting shot down.

The film is also quite lacking in any mention of Israeli ties to 9/11, and all the suspicion that comes with that. In other words, at this point in time we are already asking questions that go way beyond the scope of this film. And therefore, with all due respect, I do not think it is worthy of a flag. But hey, that is just my lowly opinion.

posted on Mar, 19 2010 @ 01:56 PM
This video reaffirms the fact that we have been waging war on Central Asia since the crusades. We've never really stopped this barrage of poisonous information into Asia.

This war did not start on sept11, 2001. It has been going for over 1500 years. By burning Alexandria down, and filling Africa and Asia with our armies, we started a war that can ONLY be stopped upon our departure from that land.

Can we really expect anything less that an Islamic Jihad? When we have pushed these people so far into a corner?

Pakistani children pull old bullets out of the walls, so they can melt them down and remake them again and again. The tanks that the soviets left in afghanistan were melted down and turned into rifles.

They will pull shards of metal out of the ground with their BARE HANDS. Just enough to make a sword to defend themselves with. When the sword became out-dated, they upgrade to the gun. When the gun becomes out-dated they will upgrade their knowledge again to make a weapon to defend themselves with. To defend what they know IS right, no matter the cost.

Thats what we have lost....what are we doing this for? So we can be MORE distracted? So we dont have to raise our OWN children? To just let Nickelodeon and Cartoon Network raise our children? What values do our children have by the time they are 10, compared to an Islamic or Arab child?

We let spongebob squarepants raise our children so they wont know the difference when they are locked in a cell, playing World of Warcraft. It will feel the same either way to them.

A link to the thread I started for this video on google. it belongs to everyone. Not just ATS.

[edit on 19-3-2010 by 7minds]

top topics

<<   2  3  4 >>

log in