Eric Lawyer-Firefighter-911 was a Criminal Coverup, page 12


Pages: <<  9    10    11    12    13    14  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 71 times


reply posted on 7-3-2010 @ 02:38 PM by Dogdish
reply to post by Alfie1



I saw no point in confusing the issue, or you. Obviously, your point was to confuse the issue.

The guns were found at ground zero, encased in melted concrete.

How did that happen?



reply posted on 7-3-2010 @ 04:08 PM by smurfy
reply to post by Alfie1

Hi Alfie,
There are quotes from several people about molton steel, there are also quotes from people who pulled out steel beams, the ends of which were dripping.

[A report in the Johns Hopkins Public Health Magazine about recovery work in late October quotes Alison Geyh, Ph.D., as stating:
Fires are still actively burning and the smoke is very intense. In some pockets now being uncovered, they are finding molten steel.]

This one is interesting as it also mentions some kind of caulk,

[A publication by the National Environmental Health Association quotes Ron Burger, a public health advisor at the National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, who arrived at Ground Zero on the evening of September 12th. Burger stated:
Feeling the heat, seeing the molten steel, the layers upon layers of ash, like lava, it reminded me of Mt. St. Helen’s and the thousands who fled that disaster.]

[An article in The Newsletter of the Structural Engineers Association of Utah describing a speaking appearance by Leslie Robertson (structural engineer responsible for the design of the World Trade Center) contains this passage: As of 21 days after the attack, the fires were still burning and molten steel was still running.]

[ Peter Tully of Tully Construction of Flushing, N.Y., and Mark Loizeaux of Controlled Demolition, Inc. of Phoenix, Md.Tully told AFP that he had seen pools of “literally molten steel” in the rubble.Loizeaux confirmed this: “Yes, hot spots of molten steel in the basements,” he said, “at the bottom of the elevator shafts of the main towers, down seven levels.” The molten steel was found “three, four, and five weeks later, when the rubble was being removed,” he said. He confirmed that molten steel was also found at WTC 7, which mysteriously collapsed in the late afternoon.]

You can make of the above what you will, but it is important that all the above are specific to describing what they saw as "Molten steel" something that even Steven Jones himself first related to as "molten metal" most of the workers whos' quotes I haven't used here, all mention "molten steel" and molten, or dripping steel girders.


reply posted on 7-3-2010 @ 04:20 PM by Alfie1
Originally posted by Dogdish
reply to
post by Alfie1



I saw no point in confusing the issue, or you. Obviously, your point was to confuse the issue.

The guns were found at ground zero, encased in melted concrete.

How did that happen?

Thank you for trying not to confuse me by being coy about where the exhibits were found, but it wasn't really necessary.

Anyway, we are all now agreed it was WTC 6 so it doesn't help at all with any issues over WTC 1,2 & 7.

As I said I doubt the weapons are actually encased in molten concrete because the guns have a considerably lower melting point than the concrete. I would guess hard-baked concrete dust and gypsum but I am quite ready to accept expert analysis.

That might be something practical that truthers could actually seek. Need to make your mind up as to whether WTC 6 was rigged with thermite though. I haven't seen that alleged so far. Another caution, if the exhibits are a literal "smoking gun" why are the wicked perps leaving them on display in a museum when they are allegedly knocking people off in plane and train crashes elsewhere in case they let anything slip ?



reply posted on 7-3-2010 @ 05:37 PM by Alfie1
reply to post by smurfy



Thanks for that smurfy but NIST was not convinced about any molten steel at the WTC and I am not convinced otherwise.

For example, Leslie Robertson, who you refer to, has specifically denied referring to molten steel there. That is mentioned in this article which covers some other things as well :-

www.911myths.com...


reply posted on 7-3-2010 @ 07:42 PM by smurfy
Originally posted by Alfie1
reply to
post by smurfy



Thanks for that smurfy but NIST was not convinced about any molten steel at the WTC and I am not convinced otherwise.

For example, Leslie Robertson, who you refer to, has specifically denied referring to molten steel there. That is mentioned in this article which covers some other things as well :-

www.911myths.com...

Leslie Robertson replied quickly by e-mail to that site, (not my source) and in it he says he has no RECOLLECTION of making that [2001] statement and would not be qualified to say that, so what did he originally say... nothing? a man with a Bsc degree, with surely some knowledge in metallurgy, and who was a chief engineer on the WTC project. As to the NIST are you referencing John Gross?


reply posted on 7-3-2010 @ 09:54 PM by GoodOlDave
Originally posted by Beancounter72
reply to
post by GoodOlDave



The steel was NOT melted? So the pictures taken of molten metal dripping from the scene of the impact before the towers fell and the molten metal that was dripping from the rubble as it was being (illegally) cleaned up must then be hoaxes.


What proof do you have that this was actually steel, vs aluminum, copper, or whatever that would be in every skyscraper in the world? The only thing I've ever seen was a bunch of mediocre quality Youtube videos analyzed by self declared video experts who likewise happened to be self declared metallurgists. You can't even determine whether it was actually from the building and not from the airplane.

The towers did NOT fall into their basements? Okay so where did the towers fall? On their sides? (NO).


The only way you can say "the towers fell neatly into the basement" is if you consider "the basement" to be the entire WTC complex. When those towers collapsed wreckage was being thrown around everywhere, even into a church a block away.

The components of the aircraft that hit the pentagon did NOT evaporate? Then if that's true then those components ie. the titanium engine parts, the steel wings, must still be there, right? Oops that right, they're not there and have never been found so either they weren't there to begin with or they 'evaporated'.


Photographs of the aircraft wreckage I.E. landing gear, engine parts, fuselage components, etc have already been posted here many times already and I know you've seen them, not to mention the black box was recovered as well, so Lawyer and his bunch claiming that the "aircraft evaporated" is false, regardless of how much you want to insist to the contrary.

If there's any disinfo here it's from you. What cell of the Mossad do you belong to?


Sheesh, so now the 9/11 attack is an Israeli plot. It's getting to the point where I have to start writing down all the people responsible for the 9/11 attack, to keep track of them all. Apparently, the only people in the world who AREN'T responsible is Al Qaida.

[edit on 7-3-2010 by GoodOlDave]


reply posted on 8-3-2010 @ 11:56 AM by REMISNE
Originally posted by hooper
Are you familiar with the logical problems involved in proving a negative?


Such a sad, old excuse for people that cannot post evidnece.

No proof? If the DNA of the last known passengers of the plane are found at the crash site, that is pretty much infallible proof where the plane parts came from. In fact that is better than any serial number matching.


Too bad NIST had to come up with new DNA testing for 9/11. Testing that was not ready untill 2002. Plus the problem with proper chain of custody and if the bodies from the plane were actually in the building.

www.nist.gov...
Due to the nature of the World Trade Center disaster, it quickly became evident that traditional methods for performing DNA typing were not likely to be fully successful in identifying all of the recovered remains. Traditional DNA ID methods depend on the presence of long, intact segments of DNA in order to accurately type the sample. The DNA in many of the samples recovered in this situation were so fragmented that these standard methods were ineffective.

In early November 2001, Dr. Robert Shaler, the director of the WTC DNA identification effort, contacted me and asked if I would be willing to develop some new DNA tests to help in the identification effort. I agreed to fast track our research efforts over the next several months and produce some test materials for his laboratory to try by January 2002.


reply posted on 8-3-2010 @ 12:24 PM by REMISNE
Originally posted by hooper
Not relative to Flight 93 were there was a definitive passenger list and next of kin could be identified.


So your stating ther was no crash or fire? If the fire was hot enough to destroy the rest of the plane it would have been hot enough to destroy DNA evidence, same as with the Pentagon.

And what is the problem with the proper chain of custody? I say the chain of custody was properly adhered, prove that's not right. And don't tell me you can't prove a negative because that is just a sad old excuse.


Well since several FBI employees had already been charged with taking items from the crime scenes it causes a big problem with chain of custody of anything involving the crime scenes.

Please check out the FBI website for further information.

www.fbi.gov...
Following the 9/11/01 attacks against New York City's World Trade Center, the residue of the two towers, spread over 174 acres of land, was hand sifted by thousands of workers to recover remains, personal effects, and evidence. Over 17,000 tons of material were processed daily. Items were taken by workers as mementos of the tragedy and recovery effort, including by FBI employees. An investigation of the removals by FBI employees, undertaken by the Department of Justice Inspector General, has resulted in citations of misconduct and in policy recommendations governing crime scenes. Many of the items have been or are being turned over to museums and other collections; the Tiffany globe in particular has been turned over to the Inspector General.


[edit on 8-3-2010 by REMISNE]


reply posted on 8-3-2010 @ 01:00 PM by hooper
reply to post by REMISNE



So your stating ther was no crash or fire?


Wow, really? That's what you got from that? Boy, talk about reading between the lines, that must be a new record.

At Shanksville all the human remains were limited to a very finite and knowable set of persons with the caveat (however unlikely in the remote location) that no one on the ground was killed.
Pages: <<  9    10    11    12    13    14  >>    ^^TOP^^



Why the Pentagon?
  Posted 3 days ago with 12 member flags
NEVER FORGET 9-11….Maybe we SHOULD forget.
  Posted 11 days ago with 11 member flags
Personal Theory on The Twin Towers Plane Pilots
  Posted 0 days ago with 8 member flags
The 9/11 Hijackers: Fraud in Official Video Exhibits Uncovered
  Posted 1 days ago with 7 member flags
Note from trapped workers surfaces 10 years after 9/11
  Posted 1 days ago with 6 member flags
Where were you when the world stopped turning...
  Posted 2 days ago with 4 member flags