A&E for 911 Truth Admit Press Conference Failure, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 7 times


reply posted on 28-2-2010 @ 09:34 AM by Shadow Herder
The only thing i see as a failure is this thread and its agenda.

Another lame attempt to slam "truthers" = Epic Fail by someone who does no research.....unlike Mr. Gage.


Your thread is blatantly misleading. He had a great turnout but no one from the major media channels. Did he fail? No, did you? yes.


There are 3-6 debunkers that troll this site and there are hundreds to thousands of other users (truthers)that know, share and have been proven to them that the official story is bunk. Why start threads like this? This is just a copy from the jref forum anyways.


.....a mind control victim used as a stooge to paint patriots as whack jobs, ....


I think he is talking about blind, childish. debunkers, trolls, and debunkers who pose as truthers..... You know, the ignorant debunkers who believe the official story even though it has been debunked years ago but hope nobody can read or think or suffers from amnesia.


Another sick mistake you make is you try to find 'failure' is anything, then try to group 911 truth into it. What is really a failure is you and the other ignorant abusers of the keyboard who parrot the official story even though the official story has been debunked.


Besides, The last time I checked, the 'Amazing' Randi owner of the jref forum conferences of the ignorant is not cheap. The media doesnt show up for those either and the way these people talk is an epic failure on the common sense and intelligence of true intellects. Shame.... $200+ dollar a ticket to be intellectually insulted. His forum is one of the most vile places a person could go for information.

Gage and his information is widely accepted and presented in a non-inflammatory way.



[edit on 28-2-2010 by Shadow Herder]


reply posted on 28-2-2010 @ 09:52 AM by SPreston
reply to post by Shadow Herder



These 'internet defense attorneys' just love to muddy the waters in their frantic attempt to defend their blessed 9-11 OFFICIAL STORY.

Fact is most mainstream journalists and reporters would rather keep their lucrative jobs and stay away from risky press conferences and unpopular with the 9-11 perps investigative issues.




reply posted on 28-2-2010 @ 10:32 AM by Shadow Herder
reply to post by ImAPepper



The fact that you are attacking people who seek and share the truth is a victory actually. It shows that you and your trolls have failed in attempts to support the overly debunk official story in attempts to save your ego and hatred for people who know more, are more intelligent and are the TRUE patriots of this country.

The fact that you attack these people and topics only strengthens it's validity.

Good job Patriots/Truthers, rip them another one


reply posted on 28-2-2010 @ 10:33 AM by ImAPepper
Originally posted by _BoneZ_


The press was notified of the news conference. If they didn't show up, it's because the press failed and likely were told not to show up by their bosses, you know, the few rich, elite people that control all mainstream media.


I wanted to touch on this again. Bonez claims that the press was likely told not to show up by their bosses. Well, I have a list of the press that were notified. I challenge Bonez and or any other truther to contact these members of the press to see if Bonez accusations are accurate.

Here is a partial list:

countdown@msnbc.com, hardball@msnbc.com, joe@msnbc.com,
viewerservices@msnbc.com, chrismatthews@msnbc.com, letters@tnr.com,
thecrypt@politico.com, bsmith@politico.com, joe_klein@timemagazine.com,
news-tips@nytimes.com, today@nbc.com, nightly@nbc.com,
lisa.hsia@nbc.com, betsy.fischer@nbc.com, mtp@nbc.com, NETAUDR@abc.com,
2020@abc.com, nightline@abcnews.com, wnn@abcnews.com, support@abcnews.go.com,
abc.news.magazines@abc.com, phil.boyce@abc.com, mimi.gurbst@abc.com,
mark.nelson@abc.com, virginia.moseley@abc.com,



penny.britell@abc.com, muriel.pearson@abc.com,
sharon.newman@abc.com, meredith.white@abc.com, gil.pimentel@abc.com,
stu.schutzman@abc.com, evening@cbsnews.com, earlyshow@cbs.com,
48hours@cbsnews.com, ftn@cbsnews.com, 60m@cbsnews.com, thismorning@cbsnews.com,
bpc@cbsnews.com, dij@cbsnews.com, efm@cbsnews.com, mkx@cbsnews.com,
pma@cbsnews.com, rbc@cbsnews.com, sundays@cbsnews.com, grain@cbsnews.com,
realitycheck@cbsnews.com, pls@cbsnews.com, pjh@cbsnews.com, wolf@cnn.com,
360@cnn.com, aaron.brown@turner.com, Paula.Zahn2@cnn.com, crossfire@cnn.com,
daybreak@cnn.com, jeff.greenfield@cnn.com, livefrom@cnn.com, newsnight@cnn.com,
tom.hannon@cnn.com, wam@cnn.com, livetoday@cnn.com, am@cnn.com,
andrea.koppel@turner.com, bill.schneider@turner.com, bruce.morton@turner.com,
carol.lin@turner.com, daryn.kagan@turner.com, david.ensor@turner.com,
jeanne.meserve@turner.com, jim.walton@turner.com, deirdre.walsh@turner.com,
kelly.wallace@turner.com, kyra.phillips@turner.com, lou.dobbs@turner.com, miles.obrien@turner.com,



paula.zahn@turner.com,
candy.crowley@turner.com

krugman@nytimes.com, vannatta@nytimes.com,
tiwein@nytimes.com, miwein@nytimes.com, weisman@nytimes.com,
liptaka@nytimes.com, bobherb@nytimes.com, reissc@nytimes.com,
public@nytimes.com, dabrooks@nytimes.com, dakirk@nytimes.com,
dasang@nytimes.com, editorial@nytimes.com, erschm@nytimes.com,
executiveeditor@nytimes.com, febarr@nytimes.com, foreign@nytimes.com,
justice@nytimes.com, burns@nytimes.com, cushman@nytimes.com,
markoff@nytimes.com, judym@nytimes.com, letters@nytimes.com,
ligree@nytimes.com, nytnews@nytimes.com, managing-editor@nytimes.com,
liberties@nytimes.com, mossm@nytimes.com, national@nytimes.com,
news-tips@nytimes.com, nicholas@nytimes.com, pekilb@nytimes.com,
ropear@nytimes.com, rotone@nytimes.com, stolberg@nytimes.com,
slabaton@nytimes.com, weisman@nytimes.com, lewin@nytimes.com,
tiwein@nytimes.com, topurd@nytimes.com, washington@nytimes.com,
safire@nytimes.com, executive-editor@nytimes.com, managing-editor@nytimes.com,
bduffy@usnews.com, letters@usnews.com, gborger@usnews.com, jallen@usnews.com,
kwalsh@usnews.com, vpope@usnews.com, whispers@usnews.com, alevin@usatoday.com,
astone@usatoday.com, bslavin@usatoday.com, bnichols@usatoday.com,
bwelch@usatoday.com, editor@usatoday.com, dmoniz@usatoday.com,
ghager@usatoday.com, gflanders@usatoday.com, jlawrence@usatoday.com,
jdrinkard@usatoday.com, jbiskupic@usatoday.com, editor@usatoday.com,
jkeen@usatoday.com, kkiely@usatoday.com, kjohnson@usatoday.com,
mhall@usatoday.com, rbenedetto@usatoday.com, rwolf@usatoday.com,
spage@usatoday.com, tsquitieri@usatoday.com, tlocy@usatoday.com,
theforum@usatoday.com, wshapiro@usatoday.com, letters@economist.com,
letters.editor@ft.com, philip.stephens@ft.com, greg.hitt@wsj.com,
wsj.ltrs@wsj.com, wsjcontact@dowjones.com, jane_mayer@newyorker.com,
themail@newyorker.com, deborah.barfield@newsday.com, ken.fireman@newsday.com,
Editors@newsweek.com,


WebEditors@newsweek.com, Letters@newsweek.com,
letters@time.com, lettersbwol@businessweek.com, letters@washingtontimes.com,
gpierce@washingtontimes.com, jmccaslin@washingtontimes.com,
dkeil@bloomberg.net, wroberts@bloomberg.net, ghall@bloomberg.net,
hprzybyla@bloomberg.net, jcohen@bloomberg.net,
NewsAlert@letters.washingtonpost.com, letters@washpost.com,
georgewill@washpost.com, jimhoagland@washpost.com, ombudsman@washpost.com,
powellm@washpost.com, kurtzh@washpost.com, abramowitz@washpost.com,
achenbachj@washpost.com, allenh@washpost.com, allenm@washpost.com,
aranam@washpost.com, argetsinger@washpost.com, asherm@washpost.com,
chuck.babbington@washingtonpost.com, bakerp@washpost.com, balzd@washpost.com,
barbashf@washpost.com, barkerk@washpost.com, barkinr@washpost.com,
barrj@washpost.com, barrs@washpost.com, beckerj@washpost.com,
behrp@washpost.com, belmanf@washpost.com, bennettp@washpost.com,
benningv@washpost.com, bersellie@washpost.com, beyersd@washpost.com,
blumj@washpost.com, bonesteelm@washpost.com, boustanyn@washpost.com,
religion@washpost.com, bredemeier@washpost.com, brennanp@washpost.com,
brooksd@washpost.com, brownw@washpost.com, browar57@aol.com

carlsonp@washpost.com, castanedar@washpost.com, cavendishs@washpost.com,

chans@washpost.com, chandlerc@washpost.com,
rajiv@washpost.com, cheaterry@washpost.com, chod@washpost.com,
claiborneb@washpost.com, clarkp@washpost.com, cohensh@washpost.com,
cohnd@washpost.com, coopermana@washpost.com, copelandl@washpost.com,
davenportc@washpost.com, davisp@washpost.com, dawsone@washpost.com,
dayk@washpost.com, deanec@washpost.com, deaned@washpost.com, deinerj@washpost.com,
deyoungk@washpost.com, dirdam@washpost.com, dobbsm@washpost.com,
drezenr@washpost.com, duttj@washpost.com, dvorakp@washpost.com,
edsallt@washpost.com, eggend@washpost.com, ahrensf@washpost.com,
aizenmann@washpost.com, nightwatch@washpost.com, donovanc@washpost.com,
newsonline@bbc.co.uk, editor@guardianunlimited.co.uk,
politics.editor@guardianunlimited.co.uk, foreign@guardian.co.uk,
letters@guardian.co.uk, politics@guardian.co.uk, online@guardian.co.uk,
foreigneditor@independent.co.uk, newseditor@independent.co.uk, letters@iht.com,
ellengoodman@globe.com, ombud@globe.com, kcooper@globe.com, letter@globe.com,
johnson@globe.com, brelis@globe.com, oliphant@globe.com,

You guys can start there.. Let me know if you need more.


reply posted on 28-2-2010 @ 10:34 AM by Sean48
reply to post by Shadow Herder



It actually has a number , De-bunking 4

When you can't argue the facts , attack the source's credibility.

It's the last de-bunker tactic .

Number 5 is ..... ADMIT DEFEAT


reply posted on 28-2-2010 @ 10:35 AM by Shadow Herder
reply to post by ImAPepper



Yawn, crickets, crickets.......



Your 'challenge' doesnt make the official story true.

Another epic failure.

[edit on 28-2-2010 by Shadow Herder]


reply posted on 28-2-2010 @ 10:41 AM by SaturnFX
reply to post by ImAPepper



I guess I am not following your...point here.
Are you actually happy that evidence is potentially being supressed and that the msm is not opening up to counterpoints of a offical story?

Odd stand, rather suspicious. What is your angle and why do you care personally if new perspectives with interesting questions are heard?


reply posted on 28-2-2010 @ 10:45 AM by ImAPepper
Originally posted by SaturnFX
reply to
post by ImAPepper



I guess I am not following your...point here.
Are you actually happy that evidence is potentially being supressed and that the msm is not opening up to counterpoints of a offical story?

Odd stand, rather suspicious. What is your angle and why do you care personally if new perspectives with interesting questions are heard?


My point is that Gage notified every media outlet available in the United States.. and beyond; alerting them of his press conference. ZERO showed up. This proves that the sane minded media does not care what this charlatan is selling, nor do they chose to expose their viewing public to his trash.

Gage offers ZERO credible evidence to support his movement.


reply posted on 28-2-2010 @ 10:54 AM by Myendica
reply to post by ImAPepper



uh well the media isnt a "reliable source"

they tell more lies then the tabloids, or even a compulsive liar... so why do we need their attention?
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



9-11 lecture at Basel University, Switzerland.
  Posted 12 days ago with 14 member flags
9/11 Actors re-visited
  Posted 5 days ago with 12 member flags
Wikipedia categorizes 9/11 truth as \'denialism\'
  Posted 16 days ago with 11 member flags
Building Collapses in Rio
  Posted 12 days ago with 6 member flags
new film "Human the film (2012)" covers all the bases and more!
  Posted 6 days ago with 6 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Santorum wants more fracking!!!
  US Political Madness, Posted 11 hours ago, 53 replies
Pass Me My Rifle
  World War Three, Posted 7 hours ago, 51 replies