State Ok's underage stripping.

Alright here we are again folk's another one of those
"uhh how did we end up going backwards" kind of moments.
Just two days ago I was reading an article about a man who had
anime porn in which children were exploited ( in cartoon form).
And now underage stripping is legal in iowa, Why you ask?
Its Art. Simple as that.
and true to its form.
America is the land of the free, am I right?
If a 17 year old girl wants to dance and reveal her self to men?
Should she be able too?
I mean if the money is good why wouldn't a confident woman take on the challenge.
Feed me your thoughts.

young strippers okay

[edit on 16-2-2010 by tribaltrip]

That is pathetic.

And now we know where the next suicide bombers will be headed.

But seriously, folks, this is really pathetic. The kooky liberal Leftists have made another step forward in their war on American conservative values. Can we look forward to women marrying oak trees?

reply to post by tribaltrip


Iv'e alway wondered why Americans are so hung up on nudity being sinful and something to be legislated against.
In Europe public nude beaches and areas are common place with kids, adolescents and people of all shapes and sizes naked.

reply to post by whaaa


Stripping is a bit different than public nudity, as it's explicitly sexualized.

I think it's pretty horrible, but it's a state's rights issue. Here's hoping nobody frequents any establishment that actually follows through and employs underage dancers. It'll be a non-issue if nobody makes any money on it. Nobody will employ underage girls if nobody pays to see it.

I agree a states rights issue. Let us remember that adult age used to be set by "the age of the majority." If tons of adults were wiped out the age of the majority would change again. Certainly once the baby boomers generation is gone we might see a shift with the age of the majority.

Oh if you say it's perfectly natural and
why not and
don't get hung up on it....
then why stop at 17?

Why not 7?

How about some 7 year old strippers?
I mean they're just trying to make a buck in these difficult economic times right?

Originally posted by EsSeeEye
reply to post by whaaa

 

Stripping is a bit different than public nudity, as it's explicitly sexualized.

I think it's pretty horrible, but it's a state's rights issue. Here's hoping nobody frequents any establishment that actually follows through and employs underage dancers. It'll be a non-issue if nobody makes any money on it. Nobody will employ underage girls if nobody pays to see it.

Actually, having young girls dancing will fill the place to standing room only.

It's all part of the "forbidden fruit" syndrome that is so exploited in America due to the repressed, constipated attitudes toward sex Americans have. Why do you think porn is such a huge business?

If a 17 year old girl wants to dance and reveal her self to men?
Should she be able too?

Hell yeah. Once they hit their mid 20s its all downhill.

Women become sexually mature at 16 or 17, so a better question would be
"why not?" I mean with The Economy being as it is, we could sure use more strippers.

reply to post by avatar01


Then you would probably love our 7 year old strippers... you wanna come see the 7 year olds?
They're amazing, and they don't even expect $10's and $20's because candy is cheap!
You can have a great time and not spend as much.

It's a win/win situation, right?

I mean it's only natural, right?

reply to post by Cabaret Voltaire


And the kooky conservative rightists would bury the girl up to her chest, and beat her with bricks until she were dead for acting in such a "sinful, unchristian" behhavior.

Given the choice between a teenager doing something stupid, and said eenager being treated like a criminal, I'll take the loony leftists, thanks.

reply to post by Cabaret Voltaire


Because a 7 year old stripper hasn't got anything worth paying to see, Cabaret. I think you're missing the core point of stripping. You need something worth looking at to be a stripper, which is why boob jobs (and for the boys, i'm sure there's something comparable) are an occupational cost on tax returns

I would ramp up your slippery slope argument with "OMG NAKED TODDLERS!" but we seem okay with seeing them run around on fabric softener commercials. i'm sure there's SOME freak fapping to a charmin ad, but that's no reason to pull the ad.

I suppose it depends on how you feel about stripping in the first place. There's only 1-365 days difference between 17 & 18 and the age limit in my state is 18.

I'm content to leave it up to the people in that state to decide the minimum age of nude or semi-nude performers.

I'm guessing that the people who are complaining don't much like 18 year old's dancing/stripping either.

reply to post by Cabaret Voltaire

Again, should any girl be put in to the situation where she needs the money that bad. And on top of everything its not like MTV doesn't encourage them enough when it comes to selling them selves.

reply to post by TheWalkingFox


Oh now don't be ridiculous. Now you're offending small breasted females.

The 7 year olds are perfect examples of youthful vigor and natural beauty.

Why not allow them to strip? Come on and tell us all. Why not??

reply to post by tribaltrip


Now that's the spirit! Maybe you could open a club where pretty 7 year olds could prance around in bikinis and dirty old men can view them through full body scanners. The girls aren't really naked now are they. You can help fund their breast implants and help them get an early start on a promising and rewarding career in lollipop sales and loneliness alleviation.

reply to post by Cabaret Voltaire


Are you actually serious about needing to know a 7 year old shouldnt be stripping?

The thinness of your argument is showing.

reply to post by brainwrek


Yes I'm serious if you want strippers then why not 7 year olds?
What is your argument against girls stripping?

It's all natural. It's good clean fun right? Helpful for the self esteem. Beneficial to the bank account.

reply to post by Cabaret Voltaire


Because its natural to find a 17 year old girl attractive, as they are in their sexual peak in terms of maturity.

a 7 year old? Nowhere near.

...this is old news... the iowa deal is two years old - and - iowa isnt the only state that allows 17 year olds to perform as strippers... some of this has been in litigation since 1998...

...heres some links...

www.projo.com/news/content/teen_dancers_07-21-09_Q6F39ID_v80.3985e27.html


www.omaha.com...

Comparing someone who is, for the most part, fully physically mature to someone who most likely has not even hit puberty yet is a bit of a stretch in my opinion. Also, I would imagine that in the 10 years time difference there, that the person may learn a thing or two and more than likely be more intelligent and capable of making informed decisions.