It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Alfie1
And he is a truther ! but an intelligent one.
Originally posted by ATH911
Originally posted by Alfie1
Coincidence is not enough.
You purposely avoided my question about how you would rate the NRO "drill" coincidence. Please do so as I asked.
You have to come up with a reason why this cancelled drill was an integral part of a 9/11 plot. I just don't understand your sentence " Because the fake crash wasn't going to happen at the NRO, it was going to happen at the Pentagon. " What does that mean ?
If the govt was going to commit a conspiracy by faking a plane crash into the Pentagon, they would have one of their military/spy agencies be the command center to run this fake plane crash operation. Wouldn't you agree?
Too many coincidences. To consider the events a coincidence is just ignorance in denial. All over the u.s there were multiple war games and defence/offence drills taking place in the week of 9/11 and some of the shadowed the actual events.
Originally posted by Shadow Herder
Too many coincidences. To consider the events a coincidence is just ignorance in denial. All over the u.s there were multiple war games and defence/offence drills taking place in the week of 9/11 and some of the shadowed the actual events.
Originally posted by ATH911
Originally posted by Shadow Herder
Too many coincidences. To consider the events a coincidence is just ignorance in denial. All over the u.s there were multiple war games and defence/offence drills taking place in the week of 9/11 and some of the shadowed the actual events.
I agree, it's just funny watching the coincidence theories (skeptics) cast them all off as mere coincidences.
Originally posted by ATH911
reply to post by Alfie1
Who said it never happened?
two
Originally posted by ATH911
reply to post by Alfie1
So the spokesperson of the super secretive US spy agency "says" they canceled it and you blindly believe them?
But you know, since we suggest the NRO drill was to really help pull off the fake crash at the Pentagon that, in effect, there was going to be no actual drill as described at the NRO, so in a sense, they are right that they "cancelled" the pretend plane crash at the NRO, because the pretend plane crash was going to be at the Pentagon instead.
Originally posted by Alfie1
If you don't believe NRO's spokesman why don't you check it out with them yourself ?
I am working on getting a translation of your para 2.
Originally posted by TrickoftheShade
If I'm picking you up right the "drill" is not a drill at all, but a coverup for the operation used to falsify the impact and wreckage? Is that what you're saying?
Like I said, it does “not disprove” there is no conspiracy now, does it?
Originally posted by Shadow Herder
You got it. This is how 911 was allowed to happen. Good people who would of been in charge to stop the attacks were under the impression it was part of the exercise.
Originally posted by impressme
More and more evidences coming to the surface, to show the OS is not true.
There are to many coincidences in the OS. Now we have evidences of a mock plane crash exercises to go on at the “exact same time” at the same spot, where the alleged hijacked plane hit. Come on, are you OS believers going to buy into this nonsense as well? What are the odds to this really happening?
Originally posted by SphinxMontreal
apparently the government was smart enough to figure out how dumb it's citizens really are. Or excuse me, maybe it is denial. Either way, people like you are to blame for this mess... and I'm starting to realize there are more than I thought (I was beginning to believe the country was waking up... NO... we are getting dumber everyday)"