NRO's 9/11 'mock' plane crash set for 9:32am, drill included a smoke generator!

page: 1
24
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
+5 more 
posted on Feb, 8 2010 @ 10:00 PM
link   

NRO's 9/11 'mock' plane crash set for 9:32am, drill included a smoke generator!

(9/11 researcher Matt Everett (aka 'Shoestring') wrote a great article near last Sept 11th anniversary that revealed some new details about the CIA & NRO's extremely suspicious and coincidental plane crash 'drill' planned for 9/11 that a lot of people might of missed.)


If it couldn't get any more coincidental than US spy agencies planning to have a mock plane crash into a govt building on -- of all days -- 9/11, their mock plane crash was to happen at 9:32am*, just 5min before the official time that the Pentagon would be hit (9:37am).


The full list of coincidences between the CIA/NRO's "drill" and the real Pentagon attack:
• Both took place on 9/11
• Both of their buildings struck by airplanes (officially)
• Both planes took off from Dulles Airport
• Both crashes happened at practically the same time (or exactly the same time)
• Both will have generators emitting smoke at near/same time.
• Both will have casualites and badly burned employees needing evacuation from their buildings
• Both will have fire trucks and EMT vehicle attending
• All parties (CIA, NRO, Pentagon, Dulles) are in the same metropolitan area
What are the odds that the everything planned in the NRO's plane-crash-into-building "drill" would take place in real life at the Pentagon on the very same day just 5min later (officially), or maybe even the same exact time (unofficially)?


killtown.blogspot.com...

More and more evidences coming to the surface, to show the OS is not true.
There are to many coincidences in the OS. Now we have evidences of a mock plane crash exercises to go on at the “exact same time” at the same spot, where the alleged hijacked plane hit. Come on, are you OS believers going to buy into this nonsense as well? What are the odds to this really happening?



[edit on 8-2-2010 by impressme]




posted on Feb, 9 2010 @ 01:07 AM
link   
reply to post by impressme
 


I just realized that, amazingly, it appears that flight 77 flew almost directly over the NRO at almost the exact same time as their planned drill.

Another 9/11 coincidence to add to the rest of them....I don't know what are the chances.



posted on Feb, 9 2010 @ 02:23 AM
link   
reply to post by PersonalChoice
 


Another 9/11 coincidence to add to the rest of them....I don't know what are the chances.



I don’t believe in this many coincidences, these were all made to happen.


September 2000 - Exactly one year before 9/11, the Project for the New American Century (PNAC) advocates the build up of the U.S. military, but won't think it will happen unless the U.S. experiences a major catastrophic event such as a "new Pearl Harbor".

REBUILDING AMERICA’S DEFENSES

Strategy, Forces and Resources For a New Century
"To preserve American military preeminence in the coming decades, the Department of Defense must move more aggressively to experiment with new technologies and operational concepts, and seek to exploit the emerging revolution in military affairs.
Moreover, the Pentagon, constrained by limited budgets and pressing current missions, has seen funding for experimentation and transformation crowded out in recent years. Spending on military research and development has been reduced dramatically over the past decade.
Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor.

PROJECT PARTICIPANTS

I. Lewis Libby (Dechert Price & Rhoads), Paul Wolfowitz (Nitze School of Advanced International Studies, Johns Hopkins University), Dov Zakheim (System Planning Corporation), William Kristol (The Weekly Standard)
" - PNAC (Pages 50-51; Sept. 2000) [HTML; Reprinted: manifestor.org] Homepage: Project for the New American Century
"...in a report just before the 2000 election that would bring Bush to power, the group predicted that the shift would come about slowly, unless there were "some catastrophic and catalyzing event, like a new Pearl Harbor."
That event came on Sept. 11, 2001. By that time, Cheney was vice president, Rumsfeld was secretary of defense, and Wolfowitz his deputy at the Pentagon." - ABC (03/10/03) [Reprinted at: WayBack Machine]
"Like his father, Bush tries to keep a daily diary of his thoughts and observations. That night [9/11], he dictated: "The Pearl Harbor of the 21st century took place today." - Washington Post (01/27/02)
"This is the second Pearl Harbor. I don't think that I overstate it," said Sen. Chuck Hagel, R-Neb., referring to the attack 60 years ago that surprised the nation's intelligence apparatus and propelled the country into World War II." - The Post (09/11/01)
(See also: January 26, 1998 - PNAC sends President Clinton a letter recommending U.S. military action against Saddam Hussein; May 4, 2001 - Dov Zakheim is sworn in as Comptroller and CFO for the Department of Defense; June 27, 2001 - '02 defense budget request is a $37.8 billion or 11.5% increase over '01)



October 24, 2000 - The Pentagon conducts the first of two emergency training exercises called MASCAL which is about a mock plane crash of a passenger aircraft into the Pentagon less than a year before 9/11.
Contingency planning Pentagon MASCAL exercise simulates scenarios in preparing for emergencies
"The fire and smoke from the downed passenger aircraft billows from the Pentagon courtyard. Defense Protective Services Police seal the crash sight. Army medics, nurses and doctors scramble to organize aid. An Arlington Fire Department chief dispatches his equipment to the affected areas.
On Oct. 24 [2000], there was a mock terrorist incident at the Pentagon Metro stop and a construction accident to name just some of the scenarios that were practiced to better prepare local agencies for real incidents.
A major player in the exercise was the Arlington Fire Department.
In this particular crash there would have been 341 victims." - Military District of Washington (11/03/00)
"No one ever imagined that a domestic plane would be used as a weapon to strike The Pentagon; but, fortuitously, because of its proximity to Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport, someone did imagine the accidental crash of a Boeing 757 airliner into the U.S. military’s headquarters. Last May, as part of their readiness training, the DiLorenzo clinic’s tri-service staff participated in a simulation exercise for this unlikely, but possible, event. They were well-prepared to help bring order to chaos after the Sept. 11 terrorist attack." - TRICARE, Military Health System
Excerpts from an interview with Major Lorie A. Brown, who was Chief Nurse of DiLorenzo TRICARE Health Clinic.
"Having practiced over the past year our roles and worked our pieces, we knew our lanes of responsibility. I’m the chairperson for the DiLorenzo Action Response Team, DART; that is our MASCAL plan. For the past year, the DART team has been working on developing that plan, really creating a whole new plan. We sat down and met on numerous occasions with the Air Force clinic, civilian EMS, [Emergency Medical Services] Pentagon and DoD hierarchy, DPS and with the other civilian medical agencies. We worked through issues, what would happen in the event of a MASCAL, what each of our roles would be. We participated in several large tabletop exercises with these external bodies, to include FEMA [Federal Emergency Management Agency] and the others I just mentioned. We even did our own internal exercise where we made up the scenario of a plane crashing into the building. Though you can never be prepared for an event like this, I am sure all our preparations and exercise paid off." - Office of Medical History, OTSG [HTML]
Excerpts from an interview with Lieutenant Colonel John Felicio, who was Deputy Commander for Administration of the DiLorenzo TRICARE Health Clinic.
"I then went out to the front of the clinic, which is basically where we normally marshal in MASCAL situations.
Meanwhile, I knew because of the two MASCAL exercises we previously did that Colonel Kaminski, our Chief of Ancillary Services, was responsible for being our Medical Liaison at the Emergency Operation Center (EOC) and that he should be en route to that location.
The saving grace to our efforts was the two MASCAL exercises we previously had conducted with the clinic leadership and staff. You know it was kind of eerie. The scenario we had for these MASCALS was very similar to what actually happened. Our scenario for both MASCALS was a plane flying into the Pentagon courtyard." - Soldiers to the Rescue/Responding in the Pentagon [HTML]
(See also: September 10, 2001 - Pentagon medic Matt Rosenberg is on the phone with the FBI talking about who has command of the MASCAL plane crash plan if a plane hits the Pentagon; 9/11 - Walter Reed Army Medical Center personnel also say that it was "eerie" how an emergency situation they went through just two weeks before the attack helped prepare them for the Pentagon crash)



• December 18, 2000 - Bush says it would be a lot easier if the U.S. was a dictatorship and he was the dictator.
"GOV. GEORGE W. BUSH (R-TX), PRESIDENT-ELECT: I told all four that there were going to be some times where we don't agree with each other. But that's OK. If this were a dictatorship, it'd be a heck of a lot easier, just so long as I'm the dictator." - CNN (12/18/00)


killtown.911review.org...



posted on Feb, 9 2010 @ 02:26 AM
link   
reply to post by impressme
 


I could deal with 100 coincidences, but 101, nope.

Good find



posted on Feb, 9 2010 @ 04:40 AM
link   
reply to post by impressme
 


NRO's drill planned for 9/11 was to imagine, no real plane involved, a light aircraft crashing into their bulding after engine failure. The drill bit was going to be evacuation of staff after the imaginary crash.

However, as soon as the real-life drama of 9/11 started to unfold this proposed drill was cancelled.

If you are suggesting that this drill, which never happened, was part of an overall conspiracy you are going to have to explain to me how it furthered the plot.



posted on Feb, 9 2010 @ 04:55 AM
link   
reply to post by Alfie1
 


NRO's drill planned for 9/11 was to imagine, no real plane involved, a light aircraft crashing into their bulding after engine failure.


Beside this being your opinion, do you have a source for this information?


If you are suggesting that this drill, which never happened, was part of an overall conspiracy you are going to have to explain to me how it furthered the plot.


I have made no claim. But, it does not disprove there is no conspiracy, don’t you agree.



posted on Feb, 9 2010 @ 05:07 AM
link   

Originally posted by impressme
reply to post by Alfie1
 


NRO's drill planned for 9/11 was to imagine, no real plane involved, a light aircraft crashing into their bulding after engine failure.


Beside this being your opinion, do you have a source for this information?


If you are suggesting that this drill, which never happened, was part of an overall conspiracy you are going to have to explain to me how it furthered the plot.


I have made no claim. But, it does not disprove there is no conspiracy, don’t you agree.




Here is a source, you will need to scroll down a few paras to get to the NRO :-

en.wikipedia.org...

You say you have made no claim but it is clear from your OP that you regard it as very suspicious to put it mildly.

As for your point about it not disproving a conspiracy; well, I had my car serviced on 9/11, that doesn't disprove a conspiracy either; just has nothing to do with it.



posted on Feb, 9 2010 @ 05:15 AM
link   
reply to post by Alfie1
 


You say you have made no claim but it is clear from your OP that you regard it as very suspicious to put it mildly.


For G-d sakes, we are on a conspiracy website! And yes I do find it very suspicious “to put it mildly.”


As for your point about it not disproving a conspiracy; well, I had my car serviced on 9/11, that doesn't disprove a conspiracy either; just has nothing to do with it.


Like I said, it does “not disprove” there is no conspiracy now, does it?
What is your point?



posted on Feb, 9 2010 @ 05:43 AM
link   

Originally posted by impressme


• December 18, 2000 - Bush says it would be a lot easier if the U.S. was a dictatorship and he was the dictator.
"GOV. GEORGE W. BUSH (R-TX), PRESIDENT-ELECT: I told all four that there were going to be some times where we don't agree with each other. But that's OK. If this were a dictatorship, it'd be a heck of a lot easier, just so long as I'm the dictator." - CNN (12/18/00)



I don;t believe the date is correct, that would have to be 2001 as he was not yet President on 12/18/2000.
9/11 had too many coincidences to be anything but a planned job from the inside.



posted on Feb, 9 2010 @ 07:32 AM
link   
reply to post by impressme
 



I have made no claim. But, it does not disprove there is no conspiracy, don’t you agree


Wow!!! No we are being challenged to not disproving, or is that not proving, or wait is that proving no conspiracy, hold on, I think I got it - we are going to have not not prove there was not a conspiracy which means, I think, that we have to prove that there was a conspiracy in order to prove there wasn't a conspiracy!! Yep, that's it!

In order to prove there was not a conspiracy we must first prove there was a conspiracy but that it didn't really happen!!

No problem, I am on it!



posted on Feb, 9 2010 @ 10:36 AM
link   
It has become common knowledge that the wargames of 911 were used as a cover for the execution of the 911 events.

The NORAD tapes reveal this so does other handfuls of testimony from the 911 commission, NEADS, FBI, CIA, Military, USAF, and eyewitnesses.

If any of the 911 plot was discovered or was or was in the process of being stopped before it could be executed, the hand waved argument that it was part of the exercise was used quite often on 911.



posted on Feb, 9 2010 @ 10:42 AM
link   
Shanksville was the preplanned site of one of these Mock crashes. The local hospital was on standby to receive 100's of casualties even before the small 10ft crater was made. The johnstown airport was also on standby before the crater was made.

This explains the lack of debris and planted evidence that has been thoroughly proven for years now.

I have witnessed one of these exercises taking place. For the majority of the time all people who werent directly invivled with the exercise honestly believed the crash was real till some time later or the next day.

The exercises are usually set up to acquire knowledge as to how civilians and professionals would react to the set up situation to make neccesary improvements incase the 'real' thing occurred.

There is ample evidence to prove that the wargames were used as the operational cover for the execution of the 9/11 events.

[edit on 9-2-2010 by Shadow Herder]

[edit on 9-2-2010 by Shadow Herder]



posted on Feb, 9 2010 @ 10:44 AM
link   
It might be worth it not to run drills anymore. The chances of an actual attack happening at that time seems to increase exponentially.

Look what happened coincidentally at Norad on 9/11 and in London on 7/7!



posted on Feb, 9 2010 @ 10:52 AM
link   
As for the smoke generator, this part I find very interesting. When you view pictures of the Pentagon crash site aside from the admitted plans for a mock crash that morning. There was a vehicle trailer that was allegedly hit by the wing or engine of the plane in question. A large percentage of the smoke seen at the crash site was emanating from this trailer.





posted on Feb, 9 2010 @ 11:51 AM
link   
I am trying to find the link that says that certain elements of the Fire dept and crash response were on alert on the morning of September 11. They were going to practice a helicopter crash or something like that at the pentagon.

Anyone have the link handy?



posted on Feb, 9 2010 @ 12:05 PM
link   
www.historycommons.org...

The US military conducts Amalgam Virgo 01, a multi-agency live-fly homeland security exercise sponsored by the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) and involving the hypothetical scenario of a cruise missile being launched by “a rogue [government] or somebody” from a barge off the East Coast. Osama bin Laden is pictured on the cover of the proposal for the exercise.



posted on Feb, 9 2010 @ 12:58 PM
link   
One more thing... after reviewing this picture some more I am left with more questions as to what hit the trailer behind the fenced in area

If whatever hit the Pentagon had wings consitant with a Boeing 757, then how is it possible that the wing didnt shear off or more damage was caused to the area in question.

The picture also proves that there could of been a smoke making machine present as the original post claims.



posted on Feb, 9 2010 @ 02:36 PM
link   

Originally posted by Alfie1
reply to post by impressme
 


NRO's drill planned for 9/11 was to imagine, no real plane involved... The drill bit was going to be evacuation of staff after the imaginary crash.

Exactly what most truthers believe happened at the Pentagon too, an IMAGINARY plane crash with a REAL generator emitting smoke.
Both happening on the same day at nearly the same time. What are the odds?!



posted on Feb, 9 2010 @ 02:46 PM
link   

Originally posted by ATH911

Originally posted by Alfie1
reply to post by impressme
 


NRO's drill planned for 9/11 was to imagine, no real plane involved... The drill bit was going to be evacuation of staff after the imaginary crash.

Exactly what most truthers believe happened at the Pentagon too, an IMAGINARY plane crash with a REAL generator emitting smoke.
Both happening on the same day at nearly the same time. What are the odds?!


So, how did the cancelled drill at the NRO further the plot ?

It seems to me you have to convince radar specialists, air traffic control, flight crew of a C130 in the area, scores of witnesses and hundreds of first responders that the plane crash at the Pentagon was imaginary.

When you have done that please get back to me.



posted on Feb, 9 2010 @ 02:49 PM
link   

Originally posted by Alfie1
So, how did the cancelled drill at the NRO further the plot ?

Who said it was totally canceled?





top topics
 
24
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join