reply to post by amance
You show events for ~1600 BC and ~10,000 BC. First of all, even 9000 BC barely fits with a 3600-year cycle (the date should be 8800 BC based on 1600
BC). Second, you have no evidence of anything occurring in 5200 BC, which would be essential in establishing a pattern. Otherwise, it would be more
likely to suggest a 7200-year cycle.
Also, to suggest any cycle at all would require more than just a couple dates. What about 12,400 BC? Or 16,000 BC? 19,600 BC?
What you have is a single event 3600 years ago, and a second possible event 8000-9000 years earlier. That's hardly a cycle.
edit on 27-2-2011
by CLPrime because: (no reason given)