It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SpacePunk
reply to post by MarshMallow_Snake
Look at it this way. If you need to use your weapon, you are probably going to be in close quarters so something like a Walther that fires .22 longs will be perfectly adequate in that situation.
Originally posted by anonamousantichrist
Originally posted by SM2
my preference is never carry anything smaller than a .357 or a .40s&w.
if it does not start with a .4, my wife and i do not waste our time. the only exception .357 is illegal to carry where i live.
anything over .45 ACP is illegal (if memory serves). although, i cant for the life of me find a reason why.....
OP, look into a non-resident permit from utah (florida is another good one). they are ALOT cheaper than any other state which requires a permit to carry (renewals are every 5 years and cost $10.00)
[edit on 21-1-2010 by anonamousantichrist]
Originally posted by Sorcha Faal
WTF? it is illegal to carry over a certain caliber? I was under the impression that dead is dead. Weather by a .380, or a .44 mag. I can understand not carrying a .308 rifle around for close combat scenario but I think a 9mm will travel just as far if not farther than a .45 acp.
Originally posted by SM2
The .380 and 9mm, especially the 9mm is faster than a .45acp. The question is stopping power. The .380 and 9mm are not going to have anywhere near the energy and stopping power of the .40 or a .45 acp. The 9mm is more accurate then a .45acp as well, however, as was previously mentioned, most gunfights will happen within 10-20 feet, and the .357 mag, .44 mag, .40 or .45 acp are just as accurate at that range but all have the stopping power to make sure that the aggressor is put down with one shot. In my opinion, stopping power is the most important thing in carrying a weapon. There is a reason why LE are switching out thier 9mm for larger rounds (typically the .40 S&W, which is standard issue for the FBI ) For a good comparison google the ballistics test for 9mm vs .45 acp look at the Temporary wound area of both. The .45acp and .40 S&W can also cause hydrostatic shock, the 9mm and .380 are not capable of this, no matter what the load or actuall projectile are, simply put they are too small and fast to cause hydrostatic shock.
Originally posted by watcher73
Originally posted by SM2
The .380 and 9mm, especially the 9mm is faster than a .45acp. The question is stopping power. The .380 and 9mm are not going to have anywhere near the energy and stopping power of the .40 or a .45 acp. The 9mm is more accurate then a .45acp as well, however, as was previously mentioned, most gunfights will happen within 10-20 feet, and the .357 mag, .44 mag, .40 or .45 acp are just as accurate at that range but all have the stopping power to make sure that the aggressor is put down with one shot. In my opinion, stopping power is the most important thing in carrying a weapon. There is a reason why LE are switching out thier 9mm for larger rounds (typically the .40 S&W, which is standard issue for the FBI ) For a good comparison google the ballistics test for 9mm vs .45 acp look at the Temporary wound area of both. The .45acp and .40 S&W can also cause hydrostatic shock, the 9mm and .380 are not capable of this, no matter what the load or actuall projectile are, simply put they are too small and fast to cause hydrostatic shock.
.40 is 1 millimeter bigger than 9mm
this argument is silly, so is hydrostatic shock, its non-existent, ask any deer shot by a big ol' rifle bullet, unless its a CNS system hit they tend to still run 40-50 yards afterwards
Originally posted by SM2
Well, not understanding somethign does not make it not exist.....
en.wikipedia.org...
last time I checked those " big 'ol rifle bullets" you spoke of...most deer are shot with either a .270, 30-06 or a .306, all of which are smaller bullets then a .40 or a .45.
As far as the temporary wound are goes... I misspoke, i was actually refering to the temporary wound cavity. heres a link explaining it in detail...
www.randywakeman.com...
Originally posted by SM2
The .380 and 9mm, especially the 9mm is faster than a .45acp. The question is stopping power. The .380 and 9mm are not going to have anywhere near the energy and stopping power of the .40 or a .45 acp.
Stopping is usually caused not by the force of the bullet (especially in the case of handgun and rifle bullets), but by the damaging effects of the bullet which are typically a loss of blood, and with it, blood pressure. More immediate effects can result when a bullet damages parts of the central nervous system, such as the spine or brain...
Gelatin and other less elastic media have much lower tensile strengths, thus they exhibit more damage after being struck with the same amount of force. At typical handgun velocities, bullets will create temporary cavities with much less than 1 MPa of pressure, and thus are incapable of causing damage to elastic tissues which they do not directly contact...
Unless a bullet directly damages or disrupts the central nervous system, a person or animal will not be instantly and completely incapacitated by physiological damage. However, bullets can cause other disabling injuries that prevent specific actions (a person shot in the femur cannot walk) and the physiological pain response from severe injuries will temporarily disable most individuals...
The momentum of the so-called "manstopper" .45 ACP bullet is approximately the momentum [28 ft·lbm/s (3.9 kg·m/s)] of a 1 pound (0.45 kilogram) mass dropped from a height of 14 feet (4.3 meters).[10] It should be noted that momentum is very different from kinetic energy; an equivalent kinetic energy [855 ft·lbf (1159 J)]of a typical .45 ACP bullet is that of a 60 pound (27 kilogram) mass dropped from a height of 14 feet (4.3 meters). Such a force is simply incapable of arresting a running target's forward momentum.
Originally posted by jibeho
It is best to determine how you want to carry and go from there. If you consider an Inside the Waist Band Holster you may want to try a thinner frame gun that uses a single stack mag. My brother uses a CrossBreed IWB holster with a Sig P239 and loves it. The beauty of IWB carry is that you can also tuck your shirt in to conceal and you don't need any extra cover.
Several .380 variants from Ruger, Kahr, Taurus, Sig Sauer and Walther have gotten some attention lately and present a low profile.
If you go 9mm, the Taurus 709, Sig P239 or Walther PPS9 are thin frame single stack guns that fit comfortably against the body. The Sig P239 is available in 9mm, .40 and .357sig and has been a top CCW choice for years. The Sigs are a little spendy but they are extremely well built and engineered.
Originally posted by MarshMallow_Snake
reply to post by MikeNice81
I have a 9mm and was thinking of getting that sub. The .40 call. entered my mind too..but I hear that round can be less accurate. Thanks!
Originally posted by Russian soldier
In my opinion the TAURUS PT Millennium Pro .45 is a good concealed carry weapon. Compact, accurate, and powerful.
Here's a photo demonstrating its size: