364 new photographs of the Pentagon on 9/11 - These pictures have never been available on the intern, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 17 times
Topic started on 17-1-2010 @ 04:49 PM by Now_Then
Article

Link to the archives

I've not got a comment just yet - got to look through the pictures - Just wanted to post to let you guys know!

I'll come back later with my thoughts.


reply posted on 17-1-2010 @ 05:07 PM by sunspot0
reply to post by dereks



Really?
this is what happnt in holland Amsterdam Bijlmer in 1992..

theres always wreckage..






reply posted on 17-1-2010 @ 05:09 PM by The Baby Seal Club
reply to post by dereks



Can you point to the part where you see a piece of the plane?
Thanx.


reply posted on 17-1-2010 @ 05:18 PM by pavelivanov22
reply to post by Now_Then



you can clearly tell there is one big hole in the center. no plane can make that in my opinion. But i guess the government is always right.



reply posted on 17-1-2010 @ 05:20 PM by dereks
Originally posted by pavelivanov22
reply to
post by Now_Then



you can clearly tell there is one big hole in the center. no plane can make that in my opinion.


So what hit the building in Holland in 1992 then?


reply posted on 17-1-2010 @ 05:20 PM by The Baby Seal Club
reply to post by dereks



None.
Matter of fact, I can't see anything that shows a plane crashed into the building.
Strange. Planes have a nasty habit of leaving marks when they crash...or at least debris.

[edit on 17-1-2010 by The Baby Seal Club]


reply posted on 17-1-2010 @ 05:30 PM by Now_Then
Originally posted by dereks
Originally posted by pavelivanov22
reply to
post by Now_Then



you can clearly tell there is one big hole in the center. no plane can make that in my opinion.


So what hit the building in Holland in 1992 then?


I believe that one was a 747 and it came in banked right over at 90 deg.

You can't make a direct comparison with the 2 buildings because they are built very differently - but that's one hell of a stark difference in crash scene!


reply posted on 17-1-2010 @ 05:34 PM by The Baby Seal Club
reply to post by dereks



Well if you're out to compare the 2 photos then take a good look at the Holland photo. See anything different from the pentagon?
From the Holland photos it appears that the majority of the plane(?) hit at about the 6th story. Not so with the Pentagon.
2nd problem with the photo from Holland is that you can't see the grass in front of the building due to debris. Not so with the Pentagon. That nice golf course green that the fire trucks are PARKED ON!

A jumbo jet smashes into the 1-2nd story of the Pentagon but leaves the front yard in immaculate condition...RRRRight!


reply posted on 17-1-2010 @ 05:52 PM by The Baby Seal Club
reply to post by dereks



Ok Dereks, my bad. I shouldn't have called a 757 a "jumbo jet".

So show me a 757 in the Pentagon...please. Or even proof that one was there.


reply posted on 17-1-2010 @ 05:58 PM by Pretaboy925
reply to post by Nematode



My bet it is just a bird caught in flight. It shows up on a few behind some telephone wires. Its nothing, I hope nobody starts up UFO stories again.


reply posted on 17-1-2010 @ 06:07 PM by The Baby Seal Club
reply to post by dereks



Dereks,
You're the debunker of these photos, I'm the "truther"(thank you for the compliment) remember? So YOU provide the evidence that these photos are fakes, or false or whatever.
BTW, the photos at the trial were provided by...the US Govt. (what else).
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



9-11 lecture at Basel University, Switzerland.
  Posted 16 days ago with 14 member flags
Newest 9/11 Documentary - Proof 9/11 was an inside Job
  Posted 0 days ago with 14 member flags
9/11 Actors re-visited
  Posted 9 days ago with 13 member flags
Building Collapses in Rio
  Posted 16 days ago with 6 member flags
new film "Human the film (2012)" covers all the bases and more!
  Posted 10 days ago with 6 member flags
Remains of 9/11 victim identified
  Posted 2 days ago with 5 member flags