It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

364 new photographs of the Pentagon on 9/11 - These pictures have never been available on the intern

page: 4
17
<< 1  2  3    5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 20 2010 @ 08:46 AM
link   
reply to post by Lillydale
 





Have a point about how many car fires I have been too? How many have you been to? How does it apply?

How many fires have you been to that are hot enough to make an airplane completely go byebye?


In 22 years in the fire service been to dozens - consequently know what a burn pattern looks like The two vehicles were ignited by burning jet fuel
from the impact. Again I pointed out fact that car was on burned on side
AWAY from the fire.

The aircraft did not just disappear - most of it had penetrated into the
building and the debris from was found

Only the combustible parts would burn - large non combustible sections
like landing gear, jet engine and such survived and were recovered

Here is just such debris recovered from exit hole ar C Ring





posted on Jan, 20 2010 @ 09:08 AM
link   
Don't forget the Penta-lawn 2000! resists even plane debris!

www.thewebfairy.com...

And the Pentanium cable spools!

killtown.911review.org...



posted on Jan, 20 2010 @ 09:17 AM
link   

Originally posted by thedman
The aircraft did not just disappear - most of it had penetrated into the
building and the debris from was found


Sorry but a plane made of composites and aluminum is not going to penatrate too far into the building no matter what the speed.



posted on Jan, 20 2010 @ 09:21 AM
link   

Originally posted by thedman

Only the combustible parts would burn - large non combustible sections
like landing gear, jet engine and such survived and were recovered

Here is just such debris recovered from exit hole ar C Ring




Both engines would have punched holes in the building either side of the hole depicted as the point of impact, facts.

Rolls Royce RB211-535E4B weight 7264lbs length 117.9 in fan dia. 74.1 in.

Simple common sense tells us that 3.6 tons of engine at 500 mph is not going anywhere but straight ahead!

Ps. No there are not any secondary holes on the facade.


[edit on 20-1-2010 by prof-rabbit]



posted on Jan, 20 2010 @ 09:37 AM
link   

Originally posted by prof-rabbit
Simple common sense tells us that 3.6 tons of engine at 500 mph is not going anywhere but straight ahead!


Lets look at some facts.

1. One of the engines hit the construction trialer and was ripped off. The engine was found OUTSIDE the building.

2. Their were no holes 40 feet apart in the side of the Pentagon.



posted on Jan, 20 2010 @ 09:49 AM
link   

Originally posted by dereks

Originally posted by SphinxMontreal
These photos show the same lack of physical aircraft evidence that all the other photos at the Pentagon show.


So where is the physical evidence of a aircraft hitting the building in Holland....


You seem to be fixated on derailing not only this thread but even reality itself. I promise it wont hurt to see and believe your own eyes. This isnt a trick, this isnt photo shop.



posted on Jan, 20 2010 @ 10:34 PM
link   

Originally posted by REMISNE

Originally posted by prof-rabbit
Simple common sense tells us that 3.6 tons of engine at 500 mph is not going anywhere but straight ahead!


Lets look at some facts.

1. One of the engines hit the construction trialer and was ripped off. The engine was found OUTSIDE the building.

2. Their were no holes 40 feet apart in the side of the Pentagon.



3.6 tons at 733 feet per second is not going to be deflected by a trailer....



posted on Jan, 20 2010 @ 11:49 PM
link   
en.wikipedia.org...

I think I found the best candidate for what hit the Pentagon and why those two cars were still intact because it was not a jet fuel fire to begin with.



posted on Jan, 20 2010 @ 11:55 PM
link   

Originally posted by mike dangerously
I think I found the best candidate for what hit the Pentagon and why those two cars were still intact because it was not a jet fuel fire to begin with.


How do you explain the damage done to the wall by a 757 sized aircraft? how do you explain a 757 engine found inside the Pentagon? How do you explain the 757 undercarriage and wheels found inside the Pentagon? how do you explain 757 seats, bodies that were DNA matched to the passengers etc etc?



posted on Jan, 20 2010 @ 11:57 PM
link   
reply to post by dereks
 


How do explain a 16 foot hole, no windows broken where tail section "should
have hit"



posted on Jan, 20 2010 @ 11:59 PM
link   
what ever it was , we know one thing......

It sure wasnt a plane......and the believers(who as a group seem to spend a hell of a lot of time on this site trying to "show us the light..."which always struck me as odd....they believe, theres no conspiracy to them...then why are they here, why should they care what we as strangers think....a conspiracy within itself??????) can stand on their heads opr do cartwheels...it makes no difference.

Anybody with a brain can see NO plane caused that damage...

And to bleat on about the vanishing plane, no wreckage, untouched lawn next to the building etc...please!!



posted on Jan, 21 2010 @ 12:05 AM
link   



No plane here either....




Both pics taken pre collapse.....neither show a plane.



posted on Jan, 21 2010 @ 12:23 AM
link   
reply to post by dereks
 
Oh, you mean the token amount of debris that the Zelikow commission assured everyone was indeed the plane? and the DNA samples that few OS supporters can't give a good explanation about just how they got it?



posted on Jan, 21 2010 @ 12:31 AM
link   

Originally posted by mike dangerously
and the DNA samples that few OS supporters can't give a good explanation about just how they got it?


What are you babbling about? They got the DNA samples from the bodies and body parts found inside the Pentagon... and pictures of some of the bodies have already been posted here



posted on Jan, 21 2010 @ 01:14 AM
link   

Originally posted by dereks

Originally posted by mike dangerously
and the DNA samples that few OS supporters can't give a good explanation about just how they got it?


What are you babbling about? They got the DNA samples from the bodies and body parts found inside the Pentagon... and pictures of some of the bodies have already been posted here


NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

NO PICTURES OF PASSENGER BODIES HAVE EVER BEEN POSTED HERE OR ANYWHERE ELSE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Stop spreading that lie. The DNA came from places that were burning 3 times hotter than a cremation oven, that is what makes it hard to explain.

You are just plain lying about the bodies.



posted on Jan, 21 2010 @ 01:32 AM
link   
reply to post by dereks
 


They got the DNA samples from the bodies and body parts found inside the Pentagon...


Can you produce creditable evidences that back your claim?


and pictures of some of the bodies have already been posted here


Yes, two photos were released of two alleged military officers by their burnt uniform they were wearing.
Other than that, there are no photos of dead bodies in the pentagon, if so, please produce them?

Stop playing the “deceptive game” that all the evidences has been put on ATS a long time ago garbage. If there were any truth to your statement, you would have gladly given us a “creditable sources” and photos to back up your claim. In fact, you would have been so “delighted” to be able to prove to someone who does not believe in the OS nonsense it would have made your day.



posted on Jan, 21 2010 @ 01:46 AM
link   
If the Authorities had any solid evidence of a airliner hitting Pentagon. They would not have kept the evidence hidden from the public like they do in this case.

By not giving the public the whole truth. They can use incidents like this to push political agendas. This whole 911 event has split the people into three camps. And that's all they needed to do.
The three different camps of supporters. Help the authorities to keep the truth hidden. They let us do the conspiracy thing among our selves.

I think ATS is a great example of how this 911 can be contained as a disagreement among our selves and the people.

[edit on 27.06.08 by spy66]



posted on Jan, 21 2010 @ 01:48 AM
link   
reply to post by Lillydale
 
I for one have not seen one photo of any bodies from the attacks and I'm here most of the time,but I guess the OP supporters are taking it on faith that these supposed pictures have been shown since all the government reports claim that they have released all relevant pictures.



posted on Jan, 21 2010 @ 01:49 AM
link   

Originally posted by Lillydale
NO PICTURES OF PASSENGER BODIES HAVE EVER BEEN POSTED HERE


Links to pictures of bodies found in the Pentagon have been posted in this thread - but as I said you do not follow links, as they destroy silly "truthers" conspiracy theories...

[edit on 21/1/10 by dereks]



posted on Jan, 21 2010 @ 01:57 AM
link   
reply to post by dereks
 



How do you explain the damage done to the wall by a 757 sized aircraft?


What damage are you referring to? The tiny small hole where the alleged airplane hit the pentagon, you mean that little hole?


how do you explain a 757 engine found inside the Pentagon?


How do you explain the clean up crew only found one engine?


How do you explain the 757 undercarriage and wheels found inside the Pentagon?


Undercarriage? Please, produce this creditable evidences to that claim?


how do you explain 757 seats, bodies


Please produce creditable sources for these fraudulent claims? Where are the photos of people strapped into their seats?


that were DNA matched to the passengers etc etc?


Really, and please do explain how the FBI was able to sift through tones of ashes to produce passengers DNA? The FBI wants you all to believe the airplane vaporized on impact? If the plane vaporized on impact so would the bodies and everything in the plane.

It really is amazing after all these years, that there are people still trying to push a “proven lie” because their OS hold no creditability.



new topics

top topics



 
17
<< 1  2  3    5 >>

log in

join