posted on Jan, 18 2010 @ 01:16 AM
what the guy above said.
Anyways, I don't think people understand what a disinformation agent is, and furthermore, don't have a well defined understanding on the system we
are trying to uncover.
The New World Order, which is not a group per say, more like a large branching info-power brokering pyramid scheme, always shows itself in plain view.
As someone said already, the best way to hide is to hide in plain sight. Alex Jones is the EPITOME that is a disinformation agent.
A disinformation agent doesn't give out COMPLETE disinformation, they need to make themselves look and appear credible. And he has done that. He has
shown plenty of solid things, but for every solid thing he's shown he's shown and discussed countless others that discredit him completely as well
as his inability to discuss and debate.
Psychological operations and disinformation are rather intricate things. It's subtle. It prays not on the waking mind but the ego and the
subconscious. It uses a sense of security to lure one in, and then feeds disinformation, paranoia, straw mans and smoke screens, in order to distort
their perception on reality.
It's clear that if Alex Jones wasn't a disinformation agent, he wouldn't be alive today. That is a fact. They would NOT allow him to be alive. They
killed Tupac, and subsequently Biggie, they've killed countless others we speculate on and likely others we don't know of. You seem to HIGHLY
underestimate who you are dealing with here.
I choose not to trust Alex. Even if he isn't a disinformation agent himself, he's a paranoid hothead who is only detrimental to the cause in the
end. Oh, sure, he opened up the possibilities of conspiracies to the mainstream; in which now they are typically openly ridiculed and ignored. How is
it that they weren't purposely done so due to the inevitability of their manner? How do you know that in order to make sure it doesn't progress even
further, they plant someone to make these claims and these discoveries, garnering him a field of followers who seemingly treat his word as dogma
sometimes?
What he does is no difference than the public usage of "New World Order" by politicians. No different than reports of microchips for humans
appearing on CNN, no different than Glenn Beck talking about the North American union. No different than the utter hijacking of the tea party movement
from their origins to the abomination they are today.