It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by impressme
Only you would have access to the crash scene in Shanskville, PA are you now working for the FBI? They did not allow your military at ground zero in Shanskville Pa, stop making up stories.
I think all of us have a sense if we imagine the kind of world we would face if the people who bombed the mess hall in Mosul, or the people who did the bombing in Spain, or the people who attacked the United States in New York, shot down the plane over Pennsylvania and attacked the Pentagon..." - Don Rumsfeld, SecDef
Originally posted by mikelee
Umm, the CIA says it was flight 98. OS'ers says it was flight 93. .............
source: NPR Radio
The aircraft that spotted the "black smoke" was an unarmed Air National Guard cargo plane that also had seen American 77 crash into the Pentagon 26 minutes earlier. After being diverted to track American 77, the cargo plane had resumed its flight to Minnesota and saw the smoke from the crash of United 93, less than two minutes after the plane went down.
Originally posted by Swampfox46_1999
You only do a reconstruction if you are not sure why the aircraft crashed. That is not the case with Flight 93.
Why are you placing "only you" in quotes? Are you suggesting I made the claim (when I did not)? Now, what does ATS rules say about that....
Besides, I am not the only one with the information. Its public information for anyone who can set their hatred of the government aside long enough to listen to the facts.
Originally posted by Lillydale
Originally posted by Swampfox46_1999
reply to post by Lillydale
Radar tracks, airfone calls, witnesses and data recorders. Oh yeah, a lack of explosive residue on the wreckage as well.
My question was WHY DID IT CRASH? and how did they know? This answers neither.
Radar tracks, airfone calls, witnesses and data recorders. Oh yeah, a lack of explosive residue on the wreckage as well.
F.B.I. Counsel: No Records Available Revealing ID Process Of Recovered 9/11 Plane Wreckage
Can The Govt Get Their Story Straight? - Location Of Flight Data Recorder
United 93 Still Airborne After Alleged Crash - According To ATC/Radar
UNITED 93 DATA PROVIDED BY US GOVERNMENT DOES NOT SUPPORT OBSERVED EVENTS
1. The NTSB Flight Path Animation approach path and altitude does not support observations.
2. All Altitude data on the northern approach contradicts witnesses published by the New York Times.
3. Witness observations of approach path contradict northern approach as described by Popular Mechanics and the US Govt. Several witnesses observed the aircraft approaching from southeast over Indian Lake and from the south prior to witnessing explosion. Parts found in New Baltimore, 8 miles southeast of crater is a direct contradiction to the northern approach claimed by the US Govt.
4. Environmental Protection Agency reports no soil contamination of jet fuel after testing 5,000-6,000 yards of earth including 3 ground wells. Smoke plume photographed by a witness does not suggest a jet fuel rich explosion.
5. Impact angle according to Flight Data Recorder does not support an almost vertical impact as the govt story and crater suggests.
You made the Evel Kinevel style jump in logic to decide I was speaking specificallly about Flight 93....and like Evel..all too often....you crashed.
United 93 Still Airborne After Alleged Crash - According To ATC/Radar
UNITED 93 DATA PROVIDED BY US GOVERNMENT DOES NOT SUPPORT OBSERVED EVENTS
1. The NTSB Flight Path Animation approach path and altitude does not support observations.
2. All Altitude data on the northern approach contradicts witnesses published by the New York Times.
3. Witness observations of approach path contradict northern approach as described by Popular Mechanics and the US Govt. Several witnesses observed the aircraft approaching from southeast over Indian Lake and from the south prior to witnessing explosion. Parts found in New Baltimore, 8 miles southeast of crater is a direct contradiction to the northern approach claimed by the US Govt.
4. Environmental Protection Agency reports no soil contamination of jet fuel after testing 5,000-6,000 yards of earth including 3 ground wells. Smoke plume photographed by a witness does not suggest a jet fuel rich explosion.
5. Impact angle according to Flight Data Recorder does not support an almost vertical impact as the govt story and crater suggests.
Originally posted by ImAPepper
Seems truthers have a hard time with that one.
Just happened to be the SAME plane that was watching the aircraft strike the WTC? Monitoring sounds more like it. Ensuring that all went as planned.
Oh Oh oH, wait! They said it was a lear jet though right?
Look at the first sentence of yours that is quoted above: The airplane that you THINK you're referring to is, in fact, the C-130 that had just departed Andrews AFB (you know, the one near DC??) and was in the vicinity to be able to SEE American 77, and SEE the airplane enroute towards the Pentagon and SEE the fireball and cloud of smoke from the impact.
One AP report stated a plane that was indentified as UAL flight 93 landed at Cleveland initially but later that story was recanted as an "error"...months later rather than right away as it should have been.
Just happened to be the SAME plane that was watching the aircraft strike the WTC? Monitoring sounds more like it. Ensuring that all went as planned.
From friends & former collegues who still work in the gov as well as sources that are NOT based in the same BS like "loose change" etc, etc.