Where was all that 95% of UA93 wreckage?, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 9 times
Topic started on 30-12-2009 @ 03:52 AM by ATH911
The FBI claims 95% of Flight 93 was recovered, sooo where was it all?




I see relatively little wreckage laying on the ground. Where are all the tires? Where are all the rims? Where are the 3 landing struts? Where are all the pieces of debris with United logo colors on them?

They say most of Flight 93 was reduced to pieces the size of a phone book, but if Flight 93 weighed 60 tons (a conservative estimate), then you would still have 57 tons of "phone books" scattered around the area and I just don't see that. Do you?

It's pretty obvious the FBI lied.

[edit on 30-12-2009 by ATH911]


reply posted on 30-12-2009 @ 06:31 AM by foxhoundone
reply to post by ATH911

I totaly agree with your line of thought ATH911, Take a look at your second picture and compare the figures in the impact zone, It does not look to scale IMO. And true were is all the debri, Them landing strues are awsome strengh.
And not to be to morbid were are all the flies that are produced.... ??


reply posted on 30-12-2009 @ 06:32 AM by hooper
reply to post by ATH911


So basically, you've concluded that the FBI lied based on your amateur analysis of photos you can find on the internet.

Can't argue with those high intellectual standards.

Just as a fun note - the one photo you posted was taken a few hundred feet away from the crash site and the other was an aerial photo taken at some point after the clean up had begun.



reply posted on 30-12-2009 @ 06:34 AM by hooper
reply to post by ATH911


Oh, one other thing - I believe that United Airlines has the wreckage in storage near Pittsburgh - have you ever asked if you may view the wreckage. I doubt if they would say yes, however, before you go calling the FBI all liars I would think you would want to explore that possibility.


reply posted on 30-12-2009 @ 07:17 AM by hooper
reply to post by ProRipp


I guess the most curious thing to me is how conspiracy believers like to apply "common sense" to things like airplane crashes and building collapses. Exactly how many people are "commonly" confronted with these experinces wherein they can develop a common knowledge? How did you develop your baseline from which you were able to deduce that these things are extraordinary?


reply posted on 30-12-2009 @ 07:37 AM by hooper
reply to post by mikelee


93



reply posted on 30-12-2009 @ 07:47 AM by thedman
You mean like this

Jet engine recovered from crater



Pieces of fuselage - notice United color scheme





Scattered debris





Recovered debris



Construction bin with recovered debris



More photos here



But you will find idiotic excuse....


reply posted on 30-12-2009 @ 08:04 AM by ImAPepper
Originally posted by mikelee
Or do you mean flight 98?

Flight "93" is actually 98


Wow Mike! You were proven wrong on so many accounts in that thread. Why post a link to it?


reply posted on 30-12-2009 @ 08:25 AM by Alfie1
reply to post by ATH911


There is actually a huge amount of evidence for UA 93 crashing near Shanksville. For example :- Air Traffic Control tapes, Flight Data Recorder and Cockpit Voice Recorder recovered from the site. ( The latter providing clear evidence of conflict between hi-jackers and passengers near the end.) Telephone calls from passengers to close relatives describing hi-jacking. DNA confirmed body parts of passengers and crew recovered from acres adjacent to crash site. Personal effects recovered from crash site. Plane parts compatible with a Boeing 757 (at least one engine part weighing about 1000 lbs)

Against that, all you seem to be offering is your personal opinion of what a photo of a high speed crash site should look like.

I would be interested to know, and I have never got a straight answer from a truther on this, is why would anyone fake a crash site in a field in Pennsylvania ?
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



9-11 lecture at Basel University, Switzerland.
  Posted 12 days ago with 14 member flags
9/11 Actors re-visited
  Posted 5 days ago with 12 member flags
Wikipedia categorizes 9/11 truth as \'denialism\'
  Posted 16 days ago with 11 member flags
Building Collapses in Rio
  Posted 12 days ago with 6 member flags
new film "Human the film (2012)" covers all the bases and more!
  Posted 6 days ago with 6 member flags