It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
When thinking about the mass extermination camps of a holocaust think..
The key to freedom is to be able to have the ability to defend yourself &, if you dont have the tools to do that, then youre going to be at the mercy of whomever wants to put you away.
Guns are deeply rooted within Swiss culture - but the gun crime rate is so low that statistics are not even kept.
link
Florida. In the ten years following the passage of Florida's concealed carry law in 1987, there were 478,248 people who received permits to carry firearms.9 FBI reports show that the homicide rate in Florida, which in 1987 was much higher than the national average, fell 39% during that 10-year period. The Florida rate is now far below the national average.
Originally posted by whaaa
reply to post by LBJ___Bush_Sr_Kild_JFK
Besides gun ownership, did you stop to consider that the Swiss have a higher standard of living and less poverty, there fore less need to excape a life of poverty thru drugs or alcohol and the crime that is associated with substance abuse.
Almost no unemployment.
Better educated and don't live in a culture that glorifies violence and macho selfish mindsets.
FACTS ABOUT GUN CONTROL
In 1918, the Soviet Union established gun control. From 1918 to 1953, about 30 million dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
——————————
In 1911, Turkey established gun control. From 1915 to 1917, 1.5 million Armenians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
——————————
Germany established gun control in 1938 and from 1939 to 1945, a total of 13 million Jews, Catholics and others who were unable to defend themselves were rounded up and exterminated.
——————————
China established gun control in 1935. From 1948 to 1952, 20 million political dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
——————————
Guatemala established gun control in 1964. From 1964 to 1981, 100,000 Mayan Indians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
——————————
Uganda established gun control in 1970. From 1971 to 1979, 300,000 Christians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
——————————
Cambodia established gun control in 1956. From 1975 to 1977, one million ‘educated’ people, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
—————————–
Defenseless people rounded up and exterminated in the 20th Century because of gun control:
56 million. (that number is an estimate, the actual number is probably higher)
——————————
It has now been 12 months since gun owners in Australia were forced by new law to surrender 640,381 personal firearms to be destroyed by their own Government, a program costing Australia taxpayers more than $500 million dollars.
The first year results are now in:
List of 7 items:
Australia-wide, homicides are up 30.
2 percent!
Australia-wide, assaults are up 88.
6 percent!
Australia-wide, armed robberies are up 44 percent (yes, 44 percent)!
In the state of Victoria alone, homicides with firearms are now up 300 percent.
Note that while the law-abiding citizens turned them in, the criminals did not, and criminals still possess their guns!
In March 1982, responding to the passage of a handgun ban in Morton Grove, Illinois, and the fawning media coverage that accompanied it, the city council of Kennesaw, Georgia, decided to make a statement of its own. With exceptions duly made for convicted felons, the disabled, and those with religious objections, the council passed (unanimously) an ordinance requiring each head of household to own and maintain a gun.
The moment the story hit the wire services, a media invasion swept into Kennesaw, a small city on the northwestern frontier of suburban Atlanta. The telephones of council members began ringing off the hook. CNN called. Today called. The then-mayor, Darvin Purdy, went on Donahue.
The press reacted predictably. The Washington Post issued a mock salute to "the brave little city of Kennesaw, Ga., soon to be pistol-packing capital of the world." In a column titled "Gun Town U.S.A.," Art Buchwald described a place where routine disagreements would be settled in Wild West shootouts. Mayor Purdy declined to talk to the Post about his own guns, claiming that "the caliber of my weapons is a personal matter." In the hands of the Post's reporter, Purdy ended up sounding like Dr. Strangelove's General Ripper, the nut bent on preserving his "precious bodily fluids."
"The national media," recalls Chief of Police Dwaine L. Wilson, "made a big shadoo out of it, [but] most of the people in this area already owned some type of firearm." Actually, the media's amazement rang hollow. The press gang expected as much from the rural South. But it is safe to say they did not expect the results.
Just down the street, at Big Shanty Hardware, owner Dave Collier is selling lawnmowers. To Collier, the problem of gun violence is larger than guns. He wonders about all the dysfunctional families, the scarcity of good parenting. "There are some underlying problems in this country that they don't know how to solve," he says.
Twelve years after it began, Kennesaw's experiment in crime control does not present itself as an easy way to arrest the killing in America's streets. It does, however, suggest where the problem doesn't lie. As Mayor Stephenson told a national gun rally in Kennesaw a few years back, "We're the town that proves more guns doesn't have to mean more crime."
As the nation debates whether more guns or fewer can prevent tragedies like the Virginia Tech Massacre, a notable anniversary passed last month in a Georgia town that witnessed a dramatic plunge in crime and violence after mandating residents to own firearms.
In March 1982, 25 years ago, the small town of Kennesaw – responding to a handgun ban in Morton Grove, Ill. – unanimously passed an ordinance requiring each head of household to own and maintain a gun. Since then, despite dire predictions of "Wild West" showdowns and increased violence and accidents, not a single resident has been involved in a fatal shooting – as a victim, attacker or defender.
The crime rate initially plummeted for several years after the passage of the ordinance, with the 2005 per capita crime rate actually significantly lower than it was in 1981, the year before passage of the law.
Prior to enactment of the law, Kennesaw had a population of just 5,242 but a crime rate significantly higher (4,332 per 100,000) than the national average (3,899 per 100,000). The latest statistics available – for the year 2005 – show the rate at 2,027 per 100,000. Meanwhile, the population has skyrocketed to 28,189.
Originally posted by whaaa
reply to post by LBJ___Bush_Sr_Kild_JFK
Besides gun ownership, did you stop to consider that the Swiss have a higher standard of living and less poverty, there fore less need to excape a life of poverty thru drugs or alcohol and the crime that is associated with substance abuse.
Almost no unemployment.
Better educated and don't live in a culture that glorifies violence and macho selfish mindsets.
Originally posted by TheWalkingFox
reply to post by LBJ___Bush_Sr_Kild_JFK
Switzerland also has some of the tightest gun regulations and punishments for gun crime.
For instance, you only get to lug your gun around in public if a) it is your militia-issue weapon and you're going to or from training / practice, OR b) you have a gun-carrying license, which is almost always restricted to people who work in jobs such as private security.
They're also part of the Schengen treaty.
Far from being some sort of gun-lovers paradise and a case study for how everyone having a gun is perfct for society, Switzerland actually models the exact opposite - HUGE restrictions on private ownership, trade, and use of firearms paied with very, very tough penalties for breaking the laws regarding guns are why Switzerland is like it is.
I want to see some of these dumb rednecks in the US if our government took up the Swiss model. They would crap themselves.
Originally posted by TheWalkingFox
Irony. All the crime is committed in the "hood" but you, out in Redneckistan, feel compelled to protect yourself. 'Cause god knows, all these criminals from "the hood" are terribly interested in knocking over your double-wide and making off with your commemorative Dale Earnhardt plates.
Are you aware that the swiss are obligated to keep both their guns and their ammo locked up in their own homes? Separately, if I'm not mistaken (I could be, on that particular).
Thankfully the hoodlums in Switzerland are probably Swiss themselves, and quite possibly polite enough to sip some coffee in the kitchen while hte homeowner gets his gun out and loads it to deal with them.
[edit on 21-12-2009 by TheWalkingFox]
Originally posted by blueorder
you good for stereotypes there, are you chief? If you read my post you would see I live in the UK and do not own a gun.
Yeah, but you knock yourself out with your acceptable stereotype of the "redneck", it makes you feel secure, look how cool I am, I am attacking these uneducated white hicks, I am probably white myself, but check how cool I am *barfs*
Yeah, we will see how that boils down in reality, and it is still more of a deterrent than breaking into a home where I may be armed with a tin opener
The Swiss have simply bred a better culture than most (refer recent ban on Minarets)
*sips coffee*
Originally posted by TheWalkingFoxSo I presume you're typing form beneath your bed? It must be terrifyiing for you.
Well, cap'n, I happen to live in the US. Originally from Alabama. I'm also not white, in fact. I'm Choctaw. well, half, on my dad's side. a fair number of the rednecks I know are, in fact, red all over, but that's beside the point.
Point is, in this country, if you hear someone squawking about how the "gub'min is try'na take mah gunz"
odds are it'll be coming form a man named Dale who wears a mullet and is carryign a can of pabst.
He will then tell you how the revolution is coming any day now, adjust his nuts, and then try to teach you how to clean a catfish using only your nails.
Put the tin opener down, and pick up the tin. A can of baked beans can mess someone's face up just fine, and isn't too pleasant no matter where it hits a body, truthfully.
Yeah, I suppose a gun is superior. But if you can't figure out how to screw someone up using household items, you probably deserve to get jacked up.
Not saying I hope you do, just that, well, you shouldn't be standing there flapping your hands for want of a gun. I don't have a gun, either, but I guarantee you won't be happy if you break into my place.
especially since I actually own nothing your average burglar would be interested in stealing. Man, that would be the worst, huh? Get beaten down by some indian dude with a bar of soap in a sock, and turns out there wasn't anything you wanted anyway.
Well, certainly better than what can be gained by inbreeding on an island.
Originally posted by paraphi
For the record this has been covered elsewhere on ATS.
Look here The earlier thread
Does this one need to be closed?
Regards