posted on Nov, 28 2009 @ 10:55 PM
Everyone is divided on what happened on 911. This is my humble opinion as to what I believe happened, agree with it or not I respect your side
regardless of where you stand and what your opinion is. I believe that the explanation provided by the government simply falls short of decisive proof
to back up their claim or, explanation. First I find it hard to believe that some of the terrorists could fly an airliner good enough to pull off the
approach to the Pentagon when there is official statements made by professional aircraft instructors who actually had these terrorists in their flight
classes, that they couldn't even fly a small aircraft let alone an aircraft the size of the ones used on 911. Also the in flight turn to approach the
Pentagon at the angle & speed the government's explanation cites is all but impossible.
A family friend who flys for AA also believes this is fantasy at best and negligent at worst as he told me about those airliners, "you just don't
fly a 757 or 767 that way". He told me it is the same difference as trying to turn around a Grey Hound bus in the same circle as a Ford Pinto...it
simply cannot be done. The Pentagon camera that we have all seen as provided to the media is simply a sham. My cameras here at my farm can perform
better than that, I can zoom in and freeze any cams at will and the image is sharp & crisp even when blown up. Now, I have a difficult time in
comprehending that our government, at their military headquarters building where at one time in history it was targeted by Soviet ICBMs is equipped
with a surveillance camera system that is no better than the ones at any Wal Mart. I mean come on! Even when slowed down the frames of this video have
obviously been altered and it don;t take a video forensic specialist to determine that, it just takes looking at the video to see that all is not
there.
If that isn't enough, from all of the videos I have watched that come from actual news footage on that day and immediately afterwards, firemen,
police officers and many people state they heard explosions as if the building was being imploded. I would tend to believe that if firemen & police
officers, who are trained professionals and know what an actual explosion sounds like (not gunshots etc) says that is what they heard, then that is
what they heard! It also boggles the mind that despite what many respected and knowledgable Architechs have stated about the buildings falling on that
day in free fall speed/manner suggesting that devices inside the towers were pretty much the cause of this, that no one in any official capacity from
any intelligence or fed law agency has ever found that to be suspicious enough to look into it. I mean, if the Taliban made a statement on CNN that
"we are responsible for 911" then they would be all over it yet, it begs me to question the integrity of those who have the authority & power to
look into these events and perhaps get to the bottom of what really happened when they steadfastly remain silent. Even some friends of mine who work
for the Fed-Gov believe there is much more than meets the eye regarding the events on 911, one of my friends who works in the intelligence field who
told me in no uncertain wording that he and others he works with believes that the government isn't telling the whole truth about what they know. I
also find it strange that the "men on the roof" were never investigated to the degree that they should have been which leads me into considering the
isreali connection to 911. For a layman such as myself, I'm savvy enough to ask what are the odds that a bunch of Mossad personnel would end up on
the roof of a building with a camera on the same day as 911 and just happen to be filming?
There are more aspects about 911 that don't add up and it isn't a matter of cross coincidences intertwined with a few facts that can just be deemed
"clerical errors". It is a series of explanations that continue to be easily proved incorrect & suspicious.
[edit on 28-11-2009 by mikelee]