It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Agree2Disagree
reply to post by impaired
I don't have a point. I want to know WHY it hasn't evolved in 300million years. Surely 300million years is a substantial amount of "time" to allow for evolutionary change....
Originally posted by uva3021
our DNA is 98.4% similar to a chimpanzee, the difference between a human and a frog is 3% genetic material, and to a worm is 5%. Almost proof that the original foundation of all life can be traced back to one single organism, sort of like the convergence of branches back to a single route.
Originally posted by impaired
So to append to the OP, I don't believe we EVOLVED from the ape or the monkey. I think the monkey was the base genetics, and they (ET's) may have used some of their own DNA. We were made in Jehova's image, right?
Like I said, very Annunaki-ish. I just don't believe the gold-deal - how we were created to mine gold. I don't think we were created for benevolent reasons, however. Perhaps for worship (these gods love their worship - that is a FACT - look it up in the bible and in other mythological documents. They go crazy for that stuff!). Or perhaps we just really didn't come out like Jehova wanted us to. Perhaps the bible is correct in that respect.
OR, now that I think of it, damn... Once Satan came into the picture and showed us the tree of life (knowledge), Jehova got pissed and didn't want as much to do with us. Once we gained that extra bit of knowledge, were we more useless and expendable? He does waste humans by the millions back then!
And getting back to worship. The way to worship a god is through prayer, right? Every story I have ever read about close encounters with ET mentions that the main form of communication is through telepathy. The transference of some kind of mental energy.
My extrapolation of that is when you pray and worship (prayer is one thing, but both combined...), you are giving this energy to the entity. I can't do that to a shady entity. Or to one that doesn't directly communicate back. The "God works in mysterious ways" is a cop-out, and it's circular logic.
Think for yourselves. Don't let a book do the thinking for you. And like I said, call me a meanie for saying these things. If the shoe doesn't fit, then don't wear it. If it really offends, then I must be making an interesting point, no?
[edit on 11/26/2009 by impaired]
I mean what is a Creator. The science of evolution is almost inarguable. Slight variations occur over time that can lead to a very slow and selective change or creation of species from other species. Whether or not a Creator billions and billions of years ago was the injector of all life is almost an empty and absurd argument. If there was/is a Creator, then the real truth is probably something that transcends the human imagination, and beyond our ability to comprehend.
Originally posted by cavscout
Originally posted by uva3021
our DNA is 98.4% similar to a chimpanzee, the difference between a human and a frog is 3% genetic material, and to a worm is 5%. Almost proof that the original foundation of all life can be traced back to one single organism, sort of like the convergence of branches back to a single route.
Why is so hard to think that genetic similarity can be explained by us all having the same creator?
Originally posted by cavscout
Originally posted by uva3021
our DNA is 98.4% similar to a chimpanzee, the difference between a human and a frog is 3% genetic material, and to a worm is 5%. Almost proof that the original foundation of all life can be traced back to one single organism, sort of like the convergence of branches back to a single route.
Why is so hard to think that genetic similarity can be explained by us all having the same creator?
Lets just assume that there is a really smart God who created everything. Would that REALY SMART God necessarily reinvent the wheel for each new species?
To OP: I find it odd that you have this holier than thou attitude toward blind faith yet you state that any argument based on the bible should be disregarded without consideration. Whats that about? You have pre conceived notions about the bible, religion, and religious peoples.
No. I was a Christian for years. I just moved on. Simple as that.
I don't say the bible should be disregarded. I just said earlier that the bibles (and most religious texts) shouldn't be taken literally. There are translation issues and the stories are 3rd-hand knowledge. Told from one perspective to a dude or dudes trying to write this all down the best they can. It's coming from one side and being filtered - if you will...
Fill in the blanks. Read between the lines. I don't think things were as mystical as they seemed.
Can you really claim to be searching for the truth if you discount the most influential book in all history as 750,000 words of rubbish? Would you really deny biblical arguments without examining the evidence? Sounds foolish to me.
Influential doesn't mean "True"...
I did give it a chance, but then I started seeing the paradoxes and contradictions. I started questioning it. Is THAT a sin? I'm sure that since Jehova created us so smart it's completely ok for us to question things. Why take it from one source? How is what I've done and been doing NOT searching for the truth? Do I HAVE TO believe it from that perspective? We do have free will, right?
And an influential book it was (and books of it's kind)... Also keeps people from asking questions.
And yet you try to come across as educated, enlightened, and logical.
Dee-fense! Dee-fense!
I never claim such a thing. I promptly admitted when I was wrong about us coming from the monkeys. I said I was here to learn. Pardon me for taking the blinders off.
And sorry that I seem to be striking a nerve with you at this point.
You throw out the phrase "circular logic" like a knee jerk reaction; you use it as screen against arguments you don’t wish to hear and evidence you don’t wish to examine.
WHAT EVIDENCE?? Yeah, there are places that have been found that are from biblical times. That and the book itself. Everything else is just a story, and believing THAT is using blind faith or by influence of an object (which in this case is the bible).
Like I said, I believe the bible from a HISTORIC point of view. I believe things happened, but some are just taking too literally and mystically. Throw in the possibilities of ET and technology and it sounds more believable.
As to your theory, it isn’t really original, now is it? I can point you to 100 similar ATS threads. In fact, there are interesting BIBLICAL arguments against the ancient astronauts thread.
I personally think that you're worshipping an ET when you worship ANY god. Just my opinion, though. You don't have to think twice about it.
I don't claim that I made this theory up. Not one bit. Not from a long shot. I just think it is shot DOWN by the religious.
"Biblical Arguments". Once again, using that as the smoking gun. Find another source than the bible and show it to the world. None of this "god's will" incidents either, please.
I personally feel (not necessarily fact, just my theory) that the book of Revelations warns us about this. After the demons are cast from heaven to earth they tell a great lie, so great that even holy people will be deceived into accepting them as gods.
I think that these demons that are cast down to Earth will seem to us to be ETs. I can picture them crashing here, like in the movie Alien Nation and telling us that the Bible is simply primitive man's attempt to describe visitations from ETs, and that they 'created' us by mixing critical DNA from their species with that of apes or primitive humanoids, thus the "missing link" is them, the aliens. They will be worshiped as our creators by most and we will allow them to cure disease and form a world government that brings peace, at least for a time.
This is what I think may happen, and it is just as valid a theory as yours, even though I follow the teachings of the Bible.
It's a belief. I don't proclaim this to be truth. I just think it is something extremely possible.
Originally posted by Ha`la`tha
reply to post by impaired
When I read your thread title, I was sure it was going to be a bbq for you..
You should have considered the title more, no doubt you'll get people coming in just to berate it thinking you have a different agenda.
Because I actually agree with a lot of what you say here. To a degree. But in essence, I agree!!
S&F
Originally posted by noangels
I dont know if one sees the michelle obama google photo fake it is obvious,last POTUS was pictured as a chimp too-perhaps as this is a conspiracy site the real shadow lords who pull the strings on our banking elite and NWO are Chimps!Its all an act,there not that dumb-there studying us like lab rats as we merrily go around our lives
Originally posted by vjr1113
This thread is so ignorant it makes me want to puke.
Originally posted by vjr1113
This thread is so ignorant it makes me want to puke.
Originally posted by impaired
Yeah. I was thinking of changing the topic, but I think it's too late. I typed what I typed and what I back it up with in my previous posts, though, so hopefully they'll refer to those.
Originally posted by Jordan River
Another alien worshipper. You guys are a dime a dozen on ats. Who created the ET's?
BOOM case closed
[edit on 26-11-2009 by Jordan River]
Originally posted by uva3021
I mean what is a Creator.
The science of evolution is almost inarguable.
And why do people give so much faith to the bible.
Like I said before, the book used ancient science that has long been dis-proven.
Pure speculation.
The people were hungry, exhausted, dehydrated, hot, and probably on shrooms, peyote, and '___'. I mean this was the desert was it not? THey were wondering around in an invariable state of hallucination.
There is nothing divine about a baby falling out a window, and there is nothing godly about laying 6 feet underground being eaten away by maggots and ants.