It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by sirnex
reply to post by Matrix Rising
Again, the question doesn't make sense because your starting by trying to define my God.
Of course every material complex thing needs a creator. I never claimed my God was a material being. This is your pressuposition that's implied in the question.
OK, so now we're just resorting to semantics arguments. I didn't say material complexity, just complexity itself. Just as your claiming that I'm attempting to define your God, your doing the same with complexity. I've never heard that aspect of the argument in that *only material complexity* requires a creator. I never once uttered that your God was a material being, where you draw that conclusion from is utterly devoid of all abilities to comprehend simple reading skill. Now that I understand it's more of a semantics issue than a real attempt to learn something, the whole argument is just moot.
You are going in circles.
If not material complexity then what substance outside the material are you referring to?
Again, this is a silly question because your trying to debate my God as defined by the atheist that doesn't believe in God. It's just a silly question.
Are you talking about complexity independent of the material? Where would this complexity reside if it isn't material?
You just proved my point.
It's a silly question because your asking, who created God when I don't believe in a created god.
I posed all those questions to show how silly the question is because an atheist can't aske me a question like that without first definin god in his/her terms and then they can't debate the God that I believe in if they can't first define a god that's limited and created.
See atheist confuse God and religion. There are many people who believe in God who are not religious. God can be a personal God in say Christiany or a person may believe and see God in things like non locality and entanglement which supports what mystics have been saying for years, that the worl is one and it's connected.
So for atheist to try to debate against God is futile. They can't do it absent their personal definition of god as created and limited. If the atheist wants to debate religion then that's legitimate.
Originally posted by reasonable
LMAO the OP is living a contradiction. He does not believe in a created god.. ok so god just 'exists' nothing created it.. ok fine.. Yet when posed with arguments regarding the existence of the universe his same ilk proclaim you can't have all of this from nothing.. yet once again in his first breath the OP claims his god came from nothing. I love how religious can pick and chose anything they want to believe and make it so. Great stuff. You didn't PWN your cousin, you just destroyed your entire belief system and the funniest bit of all is you don't even know it lol.
Again, this is the atheist trying to define God in their terms and then debate against a god that nobody believes in.
Atheist try to debate against the existence of a created god that they define. This is illogical seeing that they don't believe in God. It's a strawman argument.
*snip* using the creationist arguments against a naturally occurring universe as being to complex. *snip*
Originally posted by Lasheic
reply to post by sirnex
*snip* using the creationist arguments against a naturally occurring universe as being to complex. *snip*
A complex system does not require an even more complex designer, but can (and does) emerge and self-arrange from the interactions of simple properties. Counter-intuitive as it may seem - it's demonstrable and has been proven definitively via mathematics (the only academic field where anything can be proven definitively), observed as trends in data-sets, evidenced in every field of science, and utilized to real-world application in the commercial sector, - as well as modeled, demonstrated, and repeated.
You start out with a element. How did it appear from nothingness or Non existence?
it's demonstrable and has been proven definitively via mathematics (the only academic field where anything can be proven definitively), observed as trends in data-sets, evidenced in every field of science, and utilized to real-world application in the commercial sector, - as well as modeled, demonstrated, and repeated.