Forgive me - I'm very new to this field of study. (Alas, my bookshelf is not as prolific as I would like...I primarily have interest in Vedic texts - which I am still saving up for.)
I used to read a lot of different books on ancient aliens myself, but after looking at some fo the so called evidences and researching some of the claims, I've become somewhat disillusioned and felt like I had been had.
As for the original premise of why so many people "lie" about the Annunaki origins, is it possible that they were merely the abondoned children of the Annunaki, stuggling to come to terms with their own self identity after generations upon generations of being raised by increasingly nomadic tribes - where the oral tradition of the origin stories may not have been uniform and transmuted over time into our compounded modern texts?
So in effect, the original history could be muddied and confused by the longest ever game of 'telephone' in human history?
That's one approach to try and explain where I'm coming from...while I do not doubt the profound influence the Annunaki had on the Cradle of Civilization by any means, but I also believe there have been other advanced races who have - over the generations and in other regions - taken it upon themselves to influence mankind in some way, shape or form - though not nessecarily in the same fashion as the Annunaki.
But why would these alien races come to this planet to influence us without making themselves explicitly known? We can't claim a 'prime directive' as they would be influencing mankind.
As far as explaining the Multiverse and things like superintelligent shades of blue, I'd be getting into the realm of mysticism, and I am by no means able to explain these higher elevated concepts at this point in time.
You lost me at super-intelligent shades of blue.




